上海交通大学学报（医学版）

上海交通大学学报（医学版）

• 论著（卫生事业管理） • 上一篇    下一篇

基于学生视角的上海市高校软环境现状与分析

章雅青1，王皓岑1，钱 艳1，徐志晶1，缪 青2   

  1. 上海交通大学 1.护理学院， 2.医学院学生工作指导委员会， 上海 200025
  • 出版日期:2014-03-28 发布日期:2014-04-02
  • 作者简介:章雅青(1963—)， 女， 博士， 研究员， 博士生导师; 电子信箱: zhangyqf@shsmu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    上海市教委科研创新项目（人文社科类）基金（11YS61）；上海市教育科学研究市级项目(B11032)

Status quo and analysis of intangible environment in Shanghai area universities from the perspective of students

ZHANG Ya-qing1, WANG Hao-cen1, QIAN Yan1, XU Zhi-jing1, MIAO Qing2   

  1. 1.School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China; 2.Steering Committee on Student Affairs, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Online:2014-03-28 Published:2014-04-02
  • Supported by:

    Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission，11YS61； Project of Shanghai Education and Scientific Research，B11032

PDF (PC)

1043

摘要：

目的 从学生视角了解上海市高校软环境现状，并探讨其影响因素。方法 采用分层方便抽样的方法，选取上海市5所不同层次高校（包括2所“985”高校和3所普通高校）的1 600名本科生进行问卷调查。问卷内容主要为学生对其所在高校软环境（包括办学思想、学术氛围、学习氛围、校园生活和社会实践5个维度）的感受。共获得有效问卷1 246份。结果 学生对上海高校软环境评分为（3.43±0.71）分，属中等偏上；其中得分最高的维度为社会实践（3.72±0.82）分，得分最低的维度为办学思想（3.21±0.84）分。不同个人特征的学生对高校软环境的评价存在差异，三年级学生对学术氛围的评分高于二年级学生（P<0.01）；女生对高校软环境总分和社会实践、学术氛围两个维度的评价得分均高于男生（P<0.05）；相较于非学生干部，学生干部对高校软环境各维度和总分的评价更高（P<0.05）；高中分科为文科的学生对高校软环境的评分低于分科为理科的学生（P<0.05）。另外，“985”高校和医学院学生对高校软环境的评价高于其他院校的学生，且再次择校的意愿更高。结论 上海市高校的软环境尚可，但还需加强软环境建设以进一步提升学校软实力。

关键词: 软环境, 高校, 问卷调查

Abstract:

Objective To understand the current intangible environment of Shanghai higher education institutions from students’ perspective and to analyze its influential factors. Methods The 1 600 undergraduate students from five higher education institutions, including two “985” universities and three ordinary universities, were surveyed by questionnaires. The questionnaires covered their perceptions towards the intangible environment of universities, which consisted of five aspects: education concept, academic atmosphere, learning atmosphere, campus life, and social practice. Then 1 246 valid questionnaires were returned. Results The results demonstrated that the average score of the intangible environment of Shanghai higher education institutions was above the average level (3.43±0.71). Among all aspects, the social practice gained the highest score (3.72±0.82), while the education concept got the lowest score (3.21±0.84). The evaluation scores of the intangible environment varied among students with different personal characteristics. The average score of academic atmosphere rated by junior students was higher than that rated by sophomores (P<0.01). Compared to male students, the female students rated higher scores on social practice and academic atmosphere of their universities (P<0.05). The total average score and all aspects’ scores of the university environment that rated by student cadres were significant higher than those rated by the rest students (P<0.05). Moreover, the intangible environment scores of “985” higher education institutions were significant higher than other institutions' scores. Conclusion The students gave positive feedbacks for the intangible environment of Shanghai universities. But higher education institutions should further improve their environments.

Key words: intangible environment, higher education institution, questionnaire survey