上海交通大学学报（医学版）

›› 2009, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 1111-.

• 论著（卫生事业管理） • 上一篇    下一篇

医学学科建设与发展的相关因素分析

席晓莺1, 颜家瑜1, 王筱金2, 王 艳1, 马 进3   

  1. 上海交通大学 1. 医学院科技发展处, 2. 基础医学院生物统计学教研室, 3. 公共卫生学院, 上海 200025
  • 出版日期:2009-09-25 发布日期:2009-09-29
  • 作者简介:席晓莺（1969—）, 女, 助理研究员；电子信箱: xismile@shsmu.edu.cn。

Analysis of related factors for medical discipline construction and development

XI Xiao-ying1, YAN Jia-yu1, WANG Xiao-jin2, WANG Yan1, MA Jin3   

  1. 1. Department of Science and Technology Development, School of Medicine, 2. Department of Biostatistics, Basic Medical College, 3. School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Online:2009-09-25 Published:2009-09-29

PDF (PC)

1918

摘要：

目的 分析筛选影响医学学科发展与建设的主要因素，为进一步增强学科内涵建设提供依据。方法 以参加2007年国家重点学科评选的医学学科为研究对象，将评选结果中的学科分成三组：新增学科（n=51）、培育学科（n=33）和落选学科（n=81），采用非参数Kruskal-Wallis统计方法分析三组学科（2001—2006年的相关数据）在学术团队、科学研究、人才培养及条件建设之间的差异。结果 三组学科在学术带头人、国家级重大项目、成果奖级别、研究生质量以及科研基地等方面的差异存在统计学意义（P≤0.05）；学科落选的主要因素是缺乏高层次领军人物、国家级重大项目、高级别成果奖、高质量研究生及高层次科研基地。结论 为提升学科水平，应制定针对性措施，着力抓人才队伍建设，强化科学研究和人才培养，建立科学评估机制。

关键词: 学科建设, 医学, 比较分析, 发展思路

Abstract:

Objective To screen and analyse the dominated related factors for medical discipline construction and development, and provide evidences for the reinforcement of discipline connotation construction. Methods The candidate medical disciplines of State Key Disciplines Evaluation of 2007 were served as study subjects. Disciplines from the results of State Key Discipline Evaluation were divided into "new discipline" group （n=51）, "breeding discipline" group （n=33） and "failed discipline" group （n=81）. The differences between results of State Key Discipline Evaluation and corresponding data of past years (2001 to 2006) in academic team, scientific research, graduate education and lab construction were analysed by nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Results There were significant differences in academic leader, state key project, prize level, graduates quality and scientific research base among the results of State Key Discipline Evaluation（P≤0.05）, and the dominated factors for the unsuccessful result were lack of high-level academic leader, state key discipline, prize, gruaduates and scientific research base. Conclusion The adoption of appropriate measures for the construction of academic team, the reinforcement of scientific research and the establishment of academic achievement evaluation may help to upgrade the academic level.

Key words: discipline construction, medicine, comparison analysis, development pathway

中图分类号: