上海交通大学学报（医学版）

›› 2010, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 36-.

• 专题报道（营养学研究） • 上一篇    下一篇

上海地区儿童超重和肥胖的评价标准比较

陈 蕾1, 汤庆娅2, 阮慧娟2, 沈秀华1, 2   

  1. 上海交通大学 医学院 1. 营养系, 上海 200025；2. 新华医院临床营养中心, 上海 200092
  • 出版日期:2010-01-26 发布日期:2010-01-26
  • 作者简介:陈 蕾（1986—）, 女, 学士；电子信箱: xuanxue0122@smmail.cn；现在上海市普陀区疾病预防控制中心健康教育科(200062)。

Comparison of references for assessment of overweight and obesity in children of Shanghai

CHEN Lei1, TANG Qing-ya2, RUAN Hui-juan2, SHEN Xiu-hua1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China；2. Clinical Nutrition Center, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Online:2010-01-26 Published:2010-01-26

PDF (PC)

1735

摘要：

目的 比较和分析四种基于身高、体质量的儿童肥胖的评价标准。方法 选取上海市2 347名7~8岁的儿童，其中男生1 175名，女生1 172名，测量其身高、体质量，并计算体质量指数。分别采用身高别体质量法（1985）标准（WFH 1985标准）、中国肥胖问题工作组儿童青少年体质指数标准（WGOC标准）、欧洲国际肥胖工作组儿童青少年体质指数标准（IOTF标准）与美国疾病预防控制中心儿童青少年体质指数标准（CDC标准）评价儿童超重和肥胖的发生率。结果 ①男生超重发生率为IOTF标准明显高于其他三个标准（P<0.05），女生超重发生率IOTF标准明显高于WGOC标准和CDC标准（P<0.05）；男生肥胖发生率IOTF标准明显低于其他三个标准（P<0.01）；女生肥胖发生率IOTF标准明显低于WFH 1985标准和WGOC标准（P<0.01）。②WFH 1985标准和WGOC标准对肥胖和超重的评价结果差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 WFH 1985标准和WGOC标准比IOTF和CDC标准更适合我国儿童超重和肥胖发生率的筛查。

关键词: 肥胖, 体质量指数, 身高别体质量, 筛查标准, 儿童

Abstract:

Objective To compare and analyse four references for assessment of obesity in Chinese children. Methods The height and weight of 2 347 children (1 175  boys and 1 172 girls) aged 7 to 8 years in Shanghai were measured, and their body mass indexes (BMI) were calculated. The prevalences of overweight and obesity were evaluated and compared among reference of Weight for Height 1985 (WFH 1985 reference), BMI reference of Working Group on Obesity in China (WGOC reference), BMI reference of Europe International Obesity Task Force (IOTF reference) and BMI reference of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of American 2000 (CDC reference). Results The prevalence of overweight in boys evaluated by IOTF reference was significantly higher than those by the other three references (P<0.05), and the prevalence of overweight in girls evaluated by IOTF reference was significantly higher than those by WGOC and CDC references (P<0.05). The prevalence of obesity in boys evaluated by IOTF reference was significantly lower than those by the other three references (P<0.01), and the prevalence of obesity in girls evaluated by IOTF reference was significantly lower than those by WGOC and WFH 1985 references (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the evaluation findings of obesity and overweight between WFH 1985 and WGOC references (P>0.05). Conclusion WFH 1985 and WGOC references are more suitable than IOTF and CDC references for assessment of overweight and obesity in Chinese children.

Key words: obesity, body mass index, weight for height, screening criteria, children