›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 144-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2011.02.006

• Monographic report (Evaluation of medicaland health system reform) • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on intermediate performance indicators of deepening medical and health system reform

LI Yan-ting1, ZHAO Ming1,2, DING Lei1, LU Lin1, MA Jin1   

  1. 1.School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200025, China;2.Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Shanghai 200041, China
  • Online:2011-02-28 Published:2011-03-01
  • Supported by:

    Foundation from National Development and Reform Commission of China, 2009HR01


Objective To explain the set-up of the intermediate performance indicators in the whole evaluation indicator system of the deepening medical and health system reform. Methods Through literature review, the frame adopted by members of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in evaluating health system was referred, the related documents of the Central People's Government of China were studied, and the intermediate performance indicators were selected through Delphi method from the aspects of quality, efficiency and accessibility. Results Eight intermediate performance indicators and weight were determined. Conclusion Experts pay equal attention to quality, efficiency and accessibility of new health reform, while patients focus more on quality and costs.

Key words: new health reform, evaluation, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, intermediate performance indicators, Delphi experconsultation