不同测试指标及观测时段对情景条件恐惧实验检测5XFAD转基因小鼠行为学效力的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2020.06.009

上海交通大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 761-767.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2020.06.009

不同测试指标及观测时段对情景条件恐惧实验检测5XFAD转基因小鼠行为学效力的影响

张童，张莹林，姚俊岩

上海交通大学附属第一人民医院麻醉科，上海200080

出版日期:2020-06-28 发布日期:2020-06-28
通讯作者: 姚俊岩，电子信箱：sunshineyao@163.com。
作者简介:张童（1995—），男，硕士生；电子信箱：mrztworld@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81771269）；上海市浦江人才计划（17PJD035）。

Effect of different test indicators and observation periods in contextual fear conditioning test on detection of behavioral efficacy of 5XFAD transgenic mice

ZHANG Tong, ZHANG Ying-lin, YAO Jun-yan

Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China

Online:2020-06-28 Published:2020-06-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771269); Shanghai Pujiang Talent Plan (17PJD035).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的·探讨选择不同的测试指标和观测时段是否影响情景条件恐惧实验对5XFAD转基因小鼠学习和记忆能力的检测效力。方法·选用雄性5XFAD转基因小鼠与雌性C57BL/6小鼠交配繁殖的4月龄雌性子代5XFAD小鼠12只为实验组，同窝Littermates小鼠（LM小鼠）14只为对照组，相继进行旷场实验及情景条件恐惧实验。分别采用旷场实验中的总路程、速度及情景条件恐惧实验训练阶段前60 s的平均运动指数，评估2组小鼠的自发活动性有无差异。继而分别选取测试阶段前180 s、181～360 s或前300 s作为观测时段，评估不同观测时段下小鼠僵直时间百分比和活动抑制率，并进一步探究选择不同观测时段对2种检测指标的差异性检出效力的影响。结果·2组小鼠在旷场实验中的总路程和速度比较，差异均无统计学意义；但其情景条件恐惧实验训练阶段前60 s的平均运动指数间比较，差异有统计学意义（P=0.027）。LM小鼠不同观测时段僵直时间百分比的差异有统计学意义（均P<0.05），而活动抑制率的差异无统计学意义；5XFAD小鼠不同观测时段僵直时间百分比和活动抑制率的差异均无统计学意义。在3个观测时段观察小鼠的运动状态时，2组小鼠僵直百分比的差异均无统计学意义；选取测试阶段的前180 s观测时，5XFAD小鼠的活动抑制率明显高于LM小鼠（P=0.038）；而在其余2个观测时段中，2组小鼠活动抑制率的差异无统计学意义。结论·采用情景条件恐惧实验训练阶段的平均运动指数检测5XFAD小鼠的自发活动性较旷场实验的总路程和速度更敏感。在情景条件恐惧实验中，观测时段的不同设定可对单一品系小鼠的僵直时间百分比产生影响，而不影响活动抑制率。选用活动抑制率较僵直时间百分比更能准确反映出5XFAD小鼠的认知功能障碍，将测试阶段的前180 s作为观测时段更为准确。

关键词: 阿尔茨海默病, 5XFAD转基因小鼠, 旷场实验, 情景条件恐惧实验, 观测时段

Abstract:

Objective · To explore whether different test indicators and observation periods in contextual fear conditioning test affect the detection effectiveness of learning and memory ability of 5XFAD transgenic mice. Methods · Twelve 4-month-old female 5XFAD transgenic progeny mice and 14 4-month-old female LM progeny mice were selected, which were produced by crossing male 5XFAD transgenic mice and female C57BL/6 mice, to conduct open field test and contextual fear conditioning test in succession. Total distance and velocity in open field test and average motion index in the first 60 s of training stage in contextual fear conditioning test of the two groups of mice were used to evaluate the difference of locomotor activity. Besides, the first 180 s, 181-360 s and the first 300 s of testing stage for observation were selected to evaluate the selection effects on percent freeze and activity suppression ratio. Then further investigation was launched to explore the effects of different observation periods on the detection effectiveness of percent freeze and activity suppression ratio. Results · The differences of total distance and total velocity of the two groups of mice in open field test were not statistically significant, however the average motion index in the first 60 s of training stage in contextual fear conditioning test of 5XFAD transgenic mice was significantly higher than that of LM mice (P=0.027). The comparison of percent freeze among the three groups of observation periods of LM mice had significant difference (both P<0.05), while there was no statistical significance in activity suppression ratio. The comparisons of percent freeze and activity suppression ratio among the three groups of observation periods of 5XFAD mice had no significant difference. The differences of percent freeze between 5XFAD mice and LM mice was not statistically significant during the three observation periods. However, the activity suppression ratio of 5XFAD mice was significantly higher than that of LM mice in the first 180 s (P=0.038), in the other two observation periods the difference of activity suppression ratio between the two groups of mice was not statistically significant. Conclusion · The average motion index detected in training stage in contextual fear conditioning test is more sensitive than total distance and total velocity detected in open field test for evaluating locomotor activity of 5XFAD mice. In contextual fear conditioning test, different observation periods have effects on the value of percent freeze provided by single strain of mice, while the value of activity suppression ratio remains unaffected. Activity suppression ratio is more precise than percent freeze to reflect the cognitive deficiency of 5XFAD mice. It is more accurate to select the first 180 s of testing stage for observation.

Key words: Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 5XFAD transgenic mouse, open field test, contextual fear conditioning test, observation period

中图分类号:

R741.02

张童，张莹林，姚俊岩. 不同测试指标及观测时段对情景条件恐惧实验检测5XFAD转基因小鼠行为学效力的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(06): 761-767.

ZHANG Tong, ZHANG Ying-lin, YAO Jun-yan. Effect of different test indicators and observation periods in contextual fear conditioning test on detection of behavioral efficacy of 5XFAD transgenic mice[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2020, 40(06): 761-767.

[1]	何征晖1，汪泱2，邓志锋3. 干细胞来源的细胞外囊泡修复治疗中枢神经系统疾病的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 40(1): 134-.
[2]	何海宁，张微，严峰，史琰琛，王静华，肖世富#，王涛#. 阿尔茨海默病引起的轻度认知功能损害的微小RNA表达谱的生物信息学分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(09): 1174-1183.
[3]	王昊 1，江杉 1，龚杨明 2，刘燕 3，华丽 1，邓晓蓓 1. 大气细颗粒物通过嗅球途径导致阿尔茨海默病的机制研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(6): 666-.
[4]	方新宇 1，卢卫红 1，王慧珍 2，倪建良 3，张江涛 3，蔡军 1，李涛 4，张登峰 2，张晨 1. EGR1基因与中国汉族人群阿尔茨海默病发病风险的关联研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(2): 153-.
[5]	胡梦薇1，李苗苗1，黄婉莹1，王宇1，胡勇博1，张瑞1，侯丽娜1，陈红专1，张永芳1，王领2，谭文2，徐见容1，王昊1. 基于HPLC-MS/MS法的新型双胆碱酯酶抑制剂DDDA3大鼠药代动力学研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(11): 1233-.
[6]	陈艳 1，方新宇 1，汪也微 1，倪建良 2，张江涛 2，卢卫红 1，李涛 3，张登峰 4，张晨 1. 中国汉族FOS基因 rs1063169多态性与阿尔茨海默病的关联性研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(1): 47-.
[7]	杨寰庆 1，何祥2，杜晓光 2，肖世富 1，王涛 1. 微环境变化对 PC12细胞淀粉样前体蛋白 β位点裂解酶 1 表达的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(9): 1005-.
[8]	胡勇博 1, 2，任汝静 1，王刚 1. Rho相关的卷曲蛋白激酶 1参与 β淀粉样蛋白介导的大鼠原代神经元损伤[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(9): 1013-.
[9]	吴依娜 1, 2，庄惠翔 3，李钒 3，刘园园 1, 2，严峰 1, 2，史琰琛 1, 2，王静华 1, 2，张建业 1，刘满华 3，王金红 1，肖世富 1, 2，王涛 1, 2. 阿尔茨海默病的脑微出血特征研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(8): 917-.
[10]	余小燕 1, 2，李霞 1. 载脂蛋白E基因型与常见重性精神疾病的关联性[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(6): 704-.
[11]	何璐1，王瑛，王瑛,徐玮，陈生弟，赵简,丁健青 . 基于血浆免疫及炎症相关蛋白的阿尔茨海默病筛查标志物的研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 37(7): 950-.
[12]	蒋国红，王长明，张丽. IGF-1对PC12细胞PRNP表达及APP代谢的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2017, 37(04): 473-.
[13]	李沁洁，钟远. 阿尔茨海默病中膜脂改变与Aβ异常相关的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(12): 1809-.
[14]	黄霞，宋艳艳. 吸烟与阿尔茨海默病发病风险关联性——病例对照研究和横断面研究数据的系统分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(6): 870-.
[15]	赵丰丽，晏勇. 硫化氢治疗阿尔茨海默病的机制研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(6): 896-.

不同测试指标及观测时段对情景条件恐惧实验检测5XFAD转基因小鼠行为学效力的影响

Effect of different test indicators and observation periods in contextual fear conditioning test on detection of behavioral efficacy of 5XFAD transgenic mice

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics