临床医师撰写SCI论文的内在驱动力研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2012.08.026

›› 2012, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 1083-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2012.08.026

• 论著（卫生事业管理） • 上一篇下一篇

临床医师撰写SCI论文的内在驱动力研究

王青, 刘嘉祯, 费辛, 仓艺倩, 孙晓凡, 王春鸣, 孔宪明, 戴慧莉

上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院科研处, 上海 200127

出版日期:2012-08-28 发布日期:2012-08-29
通讯作者: 戴慧莉, 电子信箱: dhl_sh@163.com。
作者简介:王青（1969—）, 女, 助理研究员, 学士；电子信箱: wyw1236@126.com。

Research on internal driving force of doctors in writing SCI papers

WANG Qing, LIU Jia-zhen, FEI Xin, CANG Yi-qian, SUN Xiao-fan, WANG Chun-ming, KONG Xian-ming, DAI Hui-li

Research &|Development Department, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China

Online:2012-08-28 Published:2012-08-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的调查临床医师在《科学引文索引》（SCI）数据库收录杂志上发表论文（简称SCI论文）的影响因素，探讨影响医师发表SCI论文的内在原因。方法在上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院40个学科的857名临床医师中随机抽取335名进行问卷调查，回收有效问卷309份，有效率92.24 %。问卷内容包括被调查者在2007—2011年SCI论文的撰写情况、对SCI政策的知晓和反应情况、撰写SCI论文的内在驱动力，以及对自身和身边医师“被科研”问题的看法。结果被调查者愿意撰写SCI论文的主要原因为职称评定（69.11%）、科室考核（47.15%）和申请人才计划（47.15%）；不愿意撰写的主要原因为临床工作量太大（82.80%）和顾虑录取门槛较高（59.14%）。65%以上的被调查者知晓相关政策，主要知晓途径是科主任的宣讲。被调查者对SCI论文与个人职称挂钩政策的反对率高于支持率，但对将其纳入科室考核、获得经济奖励、申请学位和导师以及人才计划评定政策的支持率高于反对率，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。66.67%的被调查者曾有过“被科研”现象，80.26%的被调查者知道身边的同事存在“被科研”现象。结论临床医师撰写SCI论文的内在驱动力主要来自政策导向，但反对将其与个人职称挂钩；“被科研”现象普遍存在，应当从本质上提高医师的科研兴趣，进而提高SCI论文的数量和质量。

关键词: 医师, 科研管理, SCI论文, 内在驱动力

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the influencing factors of publishing Science Citation Index (SCI) papers in doctors, and explore the initial power in affecting SCI paper publication. Methods Three hundred and thirty-five doctors were randomly selected from 857 doctors in 40 departments of Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine for questionnaire survey, and 309 effective questionnaires were recovered, with the effective rate of 92.24%. The contents of questionnaire included the situation of writing SCI papers between 2007 and 2011, the awareness and reaction to SCI policies, the internal driving force of writing SCI papers and the attitude towards scientific research required by post. Results The main reasons for writing SCI papers were professional title assessment (69.11%), department assessment (47.15%) and talent scheme application (47.15%), and the main reasons against writing SCI papers were heavy clinical workload (82.80%) and low acceptance rate of manuscript (59.14%). More than 65% doctors knew the policies about writing SCI papers, and the main source of information was dean of the department. More doctors thought that SCI papers should not serve as the standard in professional title assessment (P<0.05), while more doctors considered that SCI papers may be included in department assessment, bonus release, academic degree application, tutor qualification application and talent scheme application (P<0.05). Scientific research required by post was found in 66.67% of respondents, and that was found in colleagues of 80.26% of respondents. Conclusion The internal driving force of doctors in writing SCI papers largely comes from the policy guidance, but most doctors are not favor of taking SCI papers as the standard of professional title assessment. Scientific research required by post is common, and the initial interest of doctors should be stimulated to improve the quality and quatity of SCI papers.

Key words: doctor, research management, SCI papers, internal driving force

王青, 刘嘉祯, 费辛, 等. 临床医师撰写SCI论文的内在驱动力研究[J]. , 2012, 32(8): 1083-.

WANG Qing, LIU Jia-zhen, FEI Xin, et al. Research on internal driving force of doctors in writing SCI papers[J]. , 2012, 32(8): 1083-.

[1]	张凤春 1, 2，马越3，林玉梅 4*，刘照南 3，闫宁宁 1, 2，徐海燕 1，徐迎春 3，王理伟 3. 三级甲等医院肿瘤相关科室医师对于患者生育力保存认知度的调查[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(5): 514-.
[2]	杨涛，陶蓉，李国红. 基于4家三级医院调查的上海市公立医院医师薪酬满意度分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(06): 896-.
[3]	王道珍，李星玮，邹扬，等. 临床实习医师和住院医师同理心状况调查——基于杰弗逊医师同理心量表的实证研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(6): 881-.
[4]	陈燕，张艳萍，马进. 住院医师规范化培训后胜任力模型的构建[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 34(3): 374-.
[5]	陈莉，顾琴龙，马进军，等. 上海市住院医师规范化培训生源情况分析与思考[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2013, 33(8): 1150-.
[6]	陈莉，方燕，于沛东，等. 临床医学专业学位研究生（住院医师）培养质量现状调查[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2013, 33(12): 1658-.
[7]	袁青，蒋易涵. 住院医师人文医学核心课程体系的初步研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2013, 33(11): 1519-.
[8]	胡嘉乐，阮洪. 美国麻醉高级护理专业设置与临床实践[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2013, 33(11): 1524-.
[9]	庄衍，程毅敏，唐勇，等. “临终关怀”教学在血液内科临床实习医师中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2013, 33(10): 1420-.
[10]	马志强, 刘敏, 王海荣. 社区卫生服务机构全科医师胜任力实证研究[J]. , 2012, 32(4): 514-.
[11]	阎仲珩, 黄登笑, 黄淇敏. 上海市部分三级医院临床医师药品不良反应认知度调查分析[J]. , 2011, 31(5): 648-.
[12]	谢庆文, 曹晓红, 唐红梅. 上海市全科医师继续医学教育现状及意向分析[J]. , 2011, 31(4): 488-.
[13]	徐蕾, 黄淇敏. 专业学位医学研究生临床技能培训的实践与研究[J]. , 2011, 31(3): 360-.
[14]	鲁菁, 方红娟, 陈立章. 临床医师对临床试验的认知及教育需求现状分析[J]. , 2011, 31(11): 1638-.
[15]	阎仲珩, 黄登笑, 黄淇敏. 临床医师防范和应对药品不良反应纠纷的调查分析[J]. , 2011, 31(1): 84-.

临床医师撰写SCI论文的内在驱动力研究

Research on internal driving force of doctors in writing SCI papers

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics