上海交通大学学报(医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 959-967.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.08.004
许嘉乐1(), 傅利勤2, 吴红2, 昝娇娇2, 吴菁1()
收稿日期:
2023-10-05
接受日期:
2024-03-04
出版日期:
2024-08-28
发布日期:
2024-08-27
通讯作者:
吴菁
E-mail:2547969055@qq.com;qingqing20030511@163.com
作者简介:
许嘉乐(2002—),女,硕士生;电子信箱:2547969055@qq.com。
基金资助:
XU Jiale1(), FU Liqin2, WU Hong2, ZAN Jiaojiao2, WU Jing1()
Received:
2023-10-05
Accepted:
2024-03-04
Online:
2024-08-28
Published:
2024-08-27
Contact:
WU Jing
E-mail:2547969055@qq.com;qingqing20030511@163.com
Supported by:
摘要:
目的·探讨髋/膝关节置换术后住院患者领悟社会支持、康复自我效能、康复锻炼依从性之间的关系,并检验康复自我效能在领悟社会支持与康复锻炼依从性关系间的中介作用。方法·采取方便抽样法,选择2021年10月—2023年2月海军军医大学第一附属医院(上海长海医院)骨关节病区的141例全髋/膝关节置换术后住院患者作为研究对象。使用一般资料调查表评估患者年龄、性别等一般人口学资料和疾病、手术信息。使用康复锻炼依从性量表(Rehabilitation Exercise Adherence Scale,REAS)评估关节置换患者术后康复锻炼的依从性;使用康复自我效能感量表(Self-Efficacy for Rehabilitation Outcome Scale,SER)评估患者康复锻炼的自我效能水平;使用领悟社会支持量表(Perceived Social Support Scale,PSSS)评估患者个体主观感受的社会支持水平。采用Pearson相关性分析检验变量间的关系,采用Bootstrap法探究康复自我效能在领悟社会支持与康复锻炼依从性关系间的中介作用。结果·共发放问卷167份,回收有效问卷141份,有效回收率84.4%。141例关节置换患者年龄范围为26~84岁,平均年龄(64.75±10.74)岁,以老年人为主。关节置换患者SER得分为(100.45±21.71)分,PSSS得分为(68.29±10.89)分,REAS得分为(11.93±2.29)分。Pearson相关性分析结果显示关节置换患者SER得分、PSSS得分、REAS得分两两之间均呈显著正相关。中介效应分析结果显示,领悟社会支持对康复锻炼依从性影响的间接效应显著(效应值为0.033,95%CI 0.017~0.058,P<0.05),领悟社会支持对康复锻炼依从性影响的直接效应不显著(效应值为0.027,95%CI -0.008~0.065,P>0.05)。结论·领悟社会支持正向预测康复锻炼依从性,康复自我效能在两者之间起完全中介作用,直接干预康复自我效能感优于调节领悟社会支持水平。
中图分类号:
许嘉乐, 傅利勤, 吴红, 昝娇娇, 吴菁. 康复自我效能在髋/膝关节置换术后住院患者领悟社会支持与康复锻炼依从性间的中介作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2024, 44(8): 959-967.
XU Jiale, FU Liqin, WU Hong, ZAN Jiaojiao, WU Jing. Mediating effect of rehabilitation self-efficacy on perceived social support and rehabilitation exercise adherence in hospitalized patients after hip/knee arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(8): 959-967.
Item | Total/n(%) | PSSS score/score | REAS score/score | SER score/score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Male | 51 (36.2) | 66.76±11.14 | 11.98±2.42 | 100.86±22.25 |
Female | 90 (63.8) | 69.15±10.71 | 11.90±2.22 | 100.22±21.52 |
t value | 1.576 | 0.040 | 0.028 | |
P value | 0.211 | 0.842 | 0.867 | |
Age | ||||
≤60 years old | 39 (27.7) | 66.67±11.52 | 11.92±2.33 | 97.87±23.29 |
>60 years old | 102 (72.3) | 68.91±10.63 | 11.93±2.28 | 101.44±21.11 |
t value | 1.201 | 0.000 | 0.761 | |
P value | 0.275 | 0.985 | 0.384 | |
Job | ||||
Retirement | 78 (55.3) | 69.31±10.97 | 12.02±2.30 | 102.13±21.95 |
Worker | 13 (9.2) | 63.46±13.23 | 11.92±2.14 | 90.46±34.36 |
Farmer | 29 (20.6) | 67.59±10.58 | 11.59±2.47 | 101.72±15.06 |
Other | 21 (14.9) | 68.48±9.20 | 12.05±2.20 | 98.67±18.33 |
F value | 1.124 | 0.278 | 1.157 | |
P value | 0.341 | 0.841 | 0.329 | |
Education | ||||
Elementary school and below | 44 (31.2) | 69.18±11.59 | 11.84±2.21 | 103.23±24.69 |
Junior high school | 43 (30.5) | 66.05±10.43 | 11.70±2.50 | 97.09±21.21 |
High school/secondary school | 35 (24.8) | 68.94±10.57 | 12.34±2.11 | 100.63±21.72 |
Junior college and above | 19 (13.5) | 70.10±10.86 | 11.89±2.35 | 101.32±14.88 |
F value | 0.923 | 0.546 | 0.588 | |
P value | 0.431 | 0.652 | 0.624 | |
Family monthly income | ||||
≤3 000 yuan | 40 (28.4) | 66.95±11.37 | 11.05±2.36 | 99.75±20.00 |
3 001‒5 000 yuan | 49 (34.8) | 67.80±11.30 | 11.94±2.29 | 101.16±19.08 |
5 001‒10 000 yuan | 38 (27.0) | 67.84±10.03 | 12.68±1.93 | 101.08±24.19 |
>10 000 yuan | 14 (9.9) | 75.07±8.65 | 12.36±2.34 | 98.29±29.28 |
F value | 2.116 | 3.714 | 0.087 | |
P value | 0.101 | 0.013 | 0.967 | |
Place of residence | ||||
Town/city | 111 (78.7) | 68.44±10.91 | 11.96±2.32 | 101.23±20.25 |
Country | 30 (21.3) | 67.73±10.96 | 11.83±2.20 | 97.60±26.62 |
t value | 0.099 | 0.066 | 0.657 | |
P value | 0.753 | 0.797 | 0.419 | |
Living condition | ||||
Living alone | 21 (14.9) | 70.48±10.78 | 12.00±2.10 | 95.19±16.71 |
Not living alone | 120 (85.1) | 67.91±10.91 | 11.92±2.33 | 101.38±22.40 |
t value | 0.994 | 0.024 | 1.455 | |
P value | 0.321 | 0.878 | 0.230 | |
Previous hospitalisation history | ||||
Yes | 109 (77.3) | 68.72±11.28 | 11.92±2.23 | 98.89±19.92 |
No | 32 (22.7) | 66.84±9.44 | 11.97±2.51 | 105.78±26.62 |
t value | 0.730 | 0.012 | 2.520 | |
P value | 0.395 | 0.912 | 0.115 | |
Previous surgical history | ||||
Yes | 87 (61.7) | 69.97±10.71 | 12.02±2.25 | 98.77±20.37 |
No | 54 (38.3) | 65.59±10.73 | 11.78±2.37 | 103.17±23.65 |
t value | 5.548 | 0.381 | 1.370 | |
P value | 0.020 | 0.538 | 0.244 | |
Joint replacement history | ||||
Yes | 26 (18.4) | 67.31±12.18 | 11.87±2.29 | 98.35±22.53 |
No | 115 (81.6) | 68.51±10.62 | 12.19±2.32 | 100.93±21.59 |
t value | 0.258 | 0.420 | 0.299 | |
P value | 0.612 | 0.518 | 0.585 | |
Chronic medical history | ||||
Yes | 82 (58.2) | 68.54±10.43 | 12.01±2.29 | 101.17±17.25 |
No | 59 (41.8) | 67.95±11.58 | 11.81±2.31 | 99.46±26.84 |
t value | 0.099 | 0.257 | 0.212 | |
P value | 0.753 | 0.613 | 0.646 | |
Joint replacement site | ||||
Knee | 71 (50.4) | 69.31±10.99 | 11.68±2.10 | 102.45±22.48 |
Hip | 70 (49.6) | 67.26±10.77 | 12.19±2.46 | 98.43±20.87 |
t value | 1.255 | 1.757 | 1.212 | |
P value | 0.265 | 0.187 | 0.273 |
表1 不同人口学特征关节置换患者PSSS、REAS和SER得分比较
Tab 1 Comparison of PSSS, REAS and SER scores in patients after hip/knee arthroplasty with different demographic characteristics
Item | Total/n(%) | PSSS score/score | REAS score/score | SER score/score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Male | 51 (36.2) | 66.76±11.14 | 11.98±2.42 | 100.86±22.25 |
Female | 90 (63.8) | 69.15±10.71 | 11.90±2.22 | 100.22±21.52 |
t value | 1.576 | 0.040 | 0.028 | |
P value | 0.211 | 0.842 | 0.867 | |
Age | ||||
≤60 years old | 39 (27.7) | 66.67±11.52 | 11.92±2.33 | 97.87±23.29 |
>60 years old | 102 (72.3) | 68.91±10.63 | 11.93±2.28 | 101.44±21.11 |
t value | 1.201 | 0.000 | 0.761 | |
P value | 0.275 | 0.985 | 0.384 | |
Job | ||||
Retirement | 78 (55.3) | 69.31±10.97 | 12.02±2.30 | 102.13±21.95 |
Worker | 13 (9.2) | 63.46±13.23 | 11.92±2.14 | 90.46±34.36 |
Farmer | 29 (20.6) | 67.59±10.58 | 11.59±2.47 | 101.72±15.06 |
Other | 21 (14.9) | 68.48±9.20 | 12.05±2.20 | 98.67±18.33 |
F value | 1.124 | 0.278 | 1.157 | |
P value | 0.341 | 0.841 | 0.329 | |
Education | ||||
Elementary school and below | 44 (31.2) | 69.18±11.59 | 11.84±2.21 | 103.23±24.69 |
Junior high school | 43 (30.5) | 66.05±10.43 | 11.70±2.50 | 97.09±21.21 |
High school/secondary school | 35 (24.8) | 68.94±10.57 | 12.34±2.11 | 100.63±21.72 |
Junior college and above | 19 (13.5) | 70.10±10.86 | 11.89±2.35 | 101.32±14.88 |
F value | 0.923 | 0.546 | 0.588 | |
P value | 0.431 | 0.652 | 0.624 | |
Family monthly income | ||||
≤3 000 yuan | 40 (28.4) | 66.95±11.37 | 11.05±2.36 | 99.75±20.00 |
3 001‒5 000 yuan | 49 (34.8) | 67.80±11.30 | 11.94±2.29 | 101.16±19.08 |
5 001‒10 000 yuan | 38 (27.0) | 67.84±10.03 | 12.68±1.93 | 101.08±24.19 |
>10 000 yuan | 14 (9.9) | 75.07±8.65 | 12.36±2.34 | 98.29±29.28 |
F value | 2.116 | 3.714 | 0.087 | |
P value | 0.101 | 0.013 | 0.967 | |
Place of residence | ||||
Town/city | 111 (78.7) | 68.44±10.91 | 11.96±2.32 | 101.23±20.25 |
Country | 30 (21.3) | 67.73±10.96 | 11.83±2.20 | 97.60±26.62 |
t value | 0.099 | 0.066 | 0.657 | |
P value | 0.753 | 0.797 | 0.419 | |
Living condition | ||||
Living alone | 21 (14.9) | 70.48±10.78 | 12.00±2.10 | 95.19±16.71 |
Not living alone | 120 (85.1) | 67.91±10.91 | 11.92±2.33 | 101.38±22.40 |
t value | 0.994 | 0.024 | 1.455 | |
P value | 0.321 | 0.878 | 0.230 | |
Previous hospitalisation history | ||||
Yes | 109 (77.3) | 68.72±11.28 | 11.92±2.23 | 98.89±19.92 |
No | 32 (22.7) | 66.84±9.44 | 11.97±2.51 | 105.78±26.62 |
t value | 0.730 | 0.012 | 2.520 | |
P value | 0.395 | 0.912 | 0.115 | |
Previous surgical history | ||||
Yes | 87 (61.7) | 69.97±10.71 | 12.02±2.25 | 98.77±20.37 |
No | 54 (38.3) | 65.59±10.73 | 11.78±2.37 | 103.17±23.65 |
t value | 5.548 | 0.381 | 1.370 | |
P value | 0.020 | 0.538 | 0.244 | |
Joint replacement history | ||||
Yes | 26 (18.4) | 67.31±12.18 | 11.87±2.29 | 98.35±22.53 |
No | 115 (81.6) | 68.51±10.62 | 12.19±2.32 | 100.93±21.59 |
t value | 0.258 | 0.420 | 0.299 | |
P value | 0.612 | 0.518 | 0.585 | |
Chronic medical history | ||||
Yes | 82 (58.2) | 68.54±10.43 | 12.01±2.29 | 101.17±17.25 |
No | 59 (41.8) | 67.95±11.58 | 11.81±2.31 | 99.46±26.84 |
t value | 0.099 | 0.257 | 0.212 | |
P value | 0.753 | 0.613 | 0.646 | |
Joint replacement site | ||||
Knee | 71 (50.4) | 69.31±10.99 | 11.68±2.10 | 102.45±22.48 |
Hip | 70 (49.6) | 67.26±10.77 | 12.19±2.46 | 98.43±20.87 |
t value | 1.255 | 1.757 | 1.212 | |
P value | 0.265 | 0.187 | 0.273 |
图1 康复自我效能在领悟社会支持与康复锻炼依从性间的中介效应模型Note: ①P=0.000.
Fig 1 Model of the mediating effect of rehabilitation self-efficacy between perceived social support and rehabilitation exercise adherence
Effect | Effect value | 95%CI | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Perceived social support →Rehabilitation self-efficacy→ Rehabilitation exercise adherence (indirect effect) | 0.033 | 0.017‒0.058 | 0.000 |
Perceived social support →Rehabilitation exercise adherence (direct effect) | 0.027 | -0.008‒0.065 | 0.130 |
Perceived social support →Rehabilitation exercise adherence (total effect) | 0.060 | 0.025‒0.107 | 0.002 |
表2 康复自我效能在领悟社会支持与康复锻炼依从性间的中介效应的Bootstrap结果
Tab 2 Bootstrap results on the mediating effect of rehabilitation self-efficacy between perceived social support and rehabilitation exercise adherence
Effect | Effect value | 95%CI | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Perceived social support →Rehabilitation self-efficacy→ Rehabilitation exercise adherence (indirect effect) | 0.033 | 0.017‒0.058 | 0.000 |
Perceived social support →Rehabilitation exercise adherence (direct effect) | 0.027 | -0.008‒0.065 | 0.130 |
Perceived social support →Rehabilitation exercise adherence (total effect) | 0.060 | 0.025‒0.107 | 0.002 |
1 | FERGUSON R J, PALMER A J, TAYLOR A, et al. Hip replacement[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10158): 1662-1671. |
2 | 边焱焱, 程开源, 常晓, 等. 2011至2019年中国人工髋膝关节置换手术量的初步统计与分析[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2020, 40(21): 1453-1460. |
BIAN Y Y, CHEN K Y, CHANG X, et al. Reports and analysis of amount of hip and knee arthroplasty in China from 2011 to 2019[J].Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, 2020, 40(21): 1453-1460. | |
3 | 黄娅若, 李彦林, 杨琼君, 等. 膝关节置换术患者运动干预的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(18): 2265-2272. |
HUANG Y N, LI Y L, YANG Q J, et al. Evidence summary of exercise intervention in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2023, 58(18): 2265-2272. | |
4 | 叶菁菁, 张咏梅, 谢倩倩, 等. 基于行为改变轮理论的健康教育与康复锻炼对全髋关节置换术后患者髋关节功能恢复的影响[J]. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48(6): 1132-1135, 1148. |
YE Q Q, ZHANG Y M, XIE Q Q, et al. Effects of health education and rehabilitation exercises based on behavior change wheel theory on the functional recovery of hip joints in patients after hip replacement[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2021, 48(6): 1132-1135, 1148. | |
5 | 尹慧珍, 山慈明. 老年关节置换术后早期活动依从性对关节恢复及深静脉血栓发生的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(6): 1450-1452. |
YIN H Z, SHAN C M. The effect of early activity compliance on joint recovery and deep vein thrombosis after arthroplasty in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2017, 37(6): 1450-1452. | |
6 | 赵改云, 许燕玲. 人工关节置换术后康复训练依从性影响因素研究现状[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2018, 35(16): 41-45. |
ZHAO G Y, XU Y L. Current status of research on factors affecting adherence to rehabilitation training after artificial joint replacement surgery[J]. Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 2018, 35(16): 41-45. | |
7 | 陈安琪. 浅析领悟社会支持[J]. 科教导刊(中旬刊), 2015(5): 169-170. |
CHEN A Q. On the perceived social support[J]. The Guide of Science & Education, 2015(5): 169-170. | |
8 | 刘倩, 于晓丽, 费燕, 等. 心理韧性和领悟社会支持在首发缺血性脑卒中患者感恩与健康促进行为间的中介效应[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(11): 12-16. |
LIU Q, YU X L, FEI Y, et al. Gratitude and health promotion behaviors among patients with first-ever ischemic stroke: the mediating role of resilience and perceived social support[J]. Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 2021, 38(11): 12-16. | |
9 | BANDURA A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychol Rev, 1977, 84(2): 191-215. |
10 | 李信欣, 吕启圆, 李江圳, 等. 髋关节置换术后患者锻炼自我效能对院外功能锻炼依从性的影响研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2019, 19(9): 1371-1375. |
LI X X, LÜ Q Y, LI J Z, et al. Influence of exercise self-efficacy on exercise compliance after discharge of patients receiving hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2019, 19(9): 1371-1375. | |
11 | 梁九清. 大学生领悟社会支持和自我效能感之间的关系[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2008, 29(4): 362. |
LIANG J Q. The relationship between perceived social support and self-efficacy of college students[J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2008, 29(4): 362. | |
12 | SCHWARZER R, LEPPIN A. Social support and health: a theoretical and empirical overview[J]. J Soc Pers Relatio, 1991, 8(1): 99-127. |
13 | WOLF E J, HARRINGTON K M, CLARK S L, et al. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety[J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 2013, 76(6): 913-934. |
14 | 郜鑫, 吴菁, 吴红. 骨科术后患者恐动症与疼痛灾难化、情绪状态的相关性研究[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2021, 35(8): 584-588. |
GAO X, WU J, WU H. Correlation of kinesiophobia to pain catastrophization and emotional state in patients after orthopedic surgery[J]. Military Medical Journal of South China, 2021, 35(8): 584-588. | |
15 | BLUMENTHAL J A, BURG M M, BAREFOOT J, et al. Social support, type A behavior, and coronary artery disease[J]. Psychosom Med, 1987, 49(4): 331-340. |
16 | 张作记. 行为医学量表手册[M]. 北京: 中华医学电子音像出版社, 2005: 206-207. |
ZHANG Z J. Handbook of behavioral medicine scales[M]. Beijing: Chinese Medical Multimedia Press, 2005: 206-207. | |
17 | 张帆, 朱树贞, 邓平基. 领悟社会支持量表在国内住院病人社会支持研究中的应用评价[J]. 护理研究, 2018, 32(13): 2048-2052. |
ZHANG F, ZHU S Z, DENG P J. Evaluation of Perceived Social Support Scale used in study of social support among hospitalized patients in China[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2018, 32(13): 2048-2052. | |
18 | WALDROP D, LIGHTSEY O R, ETHINGTON C A, et al. Self-efficacy, optimism, health competence, and recovery from orthopedic surgery[J]. J Couns Psychol, 2001, 48(2): 233-238. |
19 | 王海燕, 许燕玲, 胡三莲, 等. 中文版康复自我效能感量表的信效度评价[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2014, 49(3): 268-270. |
WANG H Y, XU Y L, HU S L, et al. Evaluation of the reliability and validity of Chinese version self-efficacy for rehabilitation outcome scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2014, 20(3): 268-270. | |
20 | 汤丹丹, 温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议[J]. 心理科学, 2020, 43(1): 215-223. |
TANG D D, WEN Z L. Statistical approaches for testing common method bias: problems and suggestions[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2020, 43(1): 215-223. | |
21 | 蒋洋洋, 吴萍, 李燕燕, 等. 康复锻炼自我效能、锻炼计划对人工髋关节置换术患者健康信念和康复锻炼依从性的链式中介作用[J]. 现代医学, 2023, 51(9): 1214-1220. |
JIANG Y Y, WU P, LI Y Y, et al. The chain intermediary effect of rehabilitation exercise self-efficacy and exercise plan on health beliefs and rehabilitation exercise compliance in patients undergoing artificial hip replacement[J]. Modern Medical Journal, 2023, 51(9): 1214-1220. | |
22 | 刘珊, 张先庚, 刘赟琦, 等. 老年髋关节置换术病人康复锻炼自我效能在心理弹性与伤残接受度间的中介效应[J]. 循证护理, 2022, 8(9): 1220-1223. |
LIU S, ZHANG X G, LIU Y Q, et al. The mediating effect of rehabilitation exercise self-efficacy on mental resilience and disability acceptance in elderly hip arthroplasty patients[J]. Chinese Evidence-Based Nursing, 2022, 8(9): 1220-1223. | |
23 | 陈微, 李昕华, 许真真, 等. 膝关节置换术后患者康复自我效能对居家康复锻炼依从性的影响[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2020, 6(9): 140-143. |
CHEN W, LI X X, XU Z Z, et al. Effect of rehabilitation self-efficacy on compliance of home rehabilitation exercise in patients after knee arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice, 2020, 6(9): 140-143. | |
24 | 吕永慧, 陈立红, 许华亮. 住院髋关节置换术后患者心理一致感现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 军事护理, 2022, 39(11): 65-68. |
LV Y H, CHEN L H, XU H L. Status quo of sense of coherence among inpatients after hip arthroplasty and its influencing factors[J]. Military Nursing, 2022, 39(11): 65-68. | |
25 | GOODYKE M P, HERSHBERGER P E, BRONAS U G, et al. Perceived social support and heart rate variability: an integrative review[J]. West J Nurs Res, 2022, 44(11): 1057-1067. |
26 | 张瑶, 郑梅. 基于慢性疾病轨迹模式的护理干预对老年冠心病病人心理、临床症状、自我效能、生活质量的影响[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(23): 4044-4048. |
ZHANG Y, ZHENG M. Effects of nursing intervention based on chronic disease trajectory model on psychology,clinical symptoms, self-efficacy and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary heart disease[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2019, 33(23): 4044-4048. | |
27 | 董雪, 景蓉, 段毅芳. 脑卒中患者康复训练依从性及其影响因素的研究现状[J]. 延安大学学报(医学科学版), 2023, 21(1): 85-88, 93. |
DONG X, JING R, DUAN Y F. Research status of rehabilitation training compliance and its influencing factors in stroke patients[J]. Journal of Yan'an University (Medical Science Edition), 2023, 21(1): 85-88, 93. | |
28 | 白佳瑶, 廖宗峰, 李玲, 等. 帕金森病患者功能锻炼的依从性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2023, 38(6): 491-495, 501. |
BAI J Y, LIAO Z F, LI L, et al. Compliance status of functional exercise in patients with Parkinson's disease and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2023, 38(6): 491-495, 501. | |
29 | MENG Y, DENG B, LIANG X Y, et al. Effectiveness of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on rehabilitation following total hip replacement: a randomized controlled trial with six-month follow-up[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022, 17(1): 225. |
30 | YANG Z, JIA H H, ZHANG F P, et al. A behavioural driving model of adherence to home-based cardiac rehabilitation exercise among patients with chronic heart failure: a mixed-methods study[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2024, 33(2): 531-542. |
31 | 蔡立柏, 刘延锦, 崔妙然, 等. 全膝关节置换术恐动症患者术后早期功能锻炼体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(11): 1663-1668. |
CAI L B, LIU Y J, CUI M R, et al. Early rehabilitation exercise in total knee arthroplasty patients with kinesiophobia:a qualitative study[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2019, 54(11): 1663-1668. | |
32 | 张文芳, 杨巧巧, 党晨珀, 等. 髋/膝关节置换术后病人康复需求和康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 循证护理, 2022, 8(22): 3015-3022. |
ZHANG W F, YANG Q Q, DANG C P, et al. Qualitative studies on rehabilitation needs and experience of patients after hip/knee arthroplasty: a meta-integration[J]. Chinese Evidence-Based Nursing, 2022, 8(22): 3015-3022. | |
33 | LAKEY B, OREHEK E. Relational regulation theory: a new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health[J]. Psychol Rev, 2011, 118(3): 482-495. |
34 | 刘雨妍, 陈娜娜, 朱红燕. 同伴教育对髋关节置换术患者自我效能及康复效果的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2019, 36(12): 2478-2480. |
LIU Y Y, CHEN N N, ZHU H Y. Effect of peer education on self-efficacy and rehabilitation of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Clinical Research, 2019, 36(12): 2478-2480. | |
35 | 孙海燕, 陈静, 景慧云, 等. 自我效能增强干预对老年全膝关节置换术后患者恐动症及康复的影响[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2019, 25(6): 813-816. |
SUN H Y, CHEN J, JING H Y, et al. Effect of self-efficacy enhancement intervention on kinesiophobia and rehabilitation of the elderly after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Geriatrics Health Care, 2019, 25(6): 813-816. | |
36 | 胡亚丽, 代娟, 石磊, 等. 自我效能联合加速康复外科干预在老年全髋关节置换围手术期病人中的应用研究[J]. 实用老年医学, 2019, 33(11): 1131-1134. |
HU Y L, DAI J, SHI L, et al. Application of self-efficacy combined with accelerated surgical intervention in perioperative patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty[J]. Practical Geriatrics, 2019, 33(11): 1131-1134. | |
37 | 萧佩如, 邓珍良, 殷玉兰, 等. 心理护理对老年髋部骨折患者康复自我效能的干预效果观察[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2021, 32(6): 983-984. |
XIAO P R, DENG Z L, YIN Y L, et al. Effect of psychological nursing intervention on rehabilitation self-efficacy of senile patients with hip fracture[J]. Modern Diagnosis and Treatment, 2021, 32(6): 983-984. |
[1] | 洪洋, 王洁, 张霞芬, 赵丹, 程敏. 智能可穿戴设备BPMpathway在全膝关节置换术后患者居家康复中的应用效果[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2024, 44(3): 342-349. |
[2] | 陈旭卓, 毛懿, 袁丹, 张善勇, 杨驰. 国产定制型全颞下颌关节假体的研发与应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(5): 524-531. |
[3] | 俞蕾蕾, 阮洪, 夏滴, 何美娟, 孙明媛, 郑吉驷. 自我效能理论主导的居家康复方案在颞下颌关节盘复位术后的应用效果[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(5): 532-539. |
[4] | 楼淑萍, 黄彦, 刘攀越, 陈辉. 能量平衡相关行为在中小学生睡眠和肥胖之间的中介效应分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(4): 519-524. |
[5] | 胡玉莲, 章雅青. 工作压力、心理韧性、领悟社会支持对辅助生殖科护士共情疲劳的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(12): 1565-1571. |
[6] | 王峰伟1,沈秋明1,拉巴仓拉1,施 悦1,张舒娴1,王沪雯1,常睿捷1,杨颖华2,万和平3,沈 恬1,蔡 泳1. 上海市社区中老年居民骨质疏松症预防相关路径分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(4): 525-. |
[7] | 董旻晔1, 2,贾芷莹1, 2,施贞夙2, 3,李国红1, 2. 情绪智力对危机干预情境中行为表现的影响研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(1): 101-. |
[8] | 栾 伟1, 2*,朱 珠2*,朱冬平2,葛文静2,朱群妹3,蒋燕勤2,李 劲2,姜安丽1. 城乡结合社区老年人健康促进生活方式与社会支持、自我效能感相关性研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(1): 107-. |
[9] | 董晓晶 1,张男 1,甘露 1,吴怡颖 1,陈允允 1,方琼 2. 个案管理模式下老年乳腺癌患者辅助治疗依从性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(2): 170-. |
[10] | 刘娜,李霞,史琰琛,盛梅青,仇琦,房圆,林翔. 团体认知行为治疗应用于老年抑郁症初探[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(1): 30-. |
[11] | 张进,孙立,杨先腾,胡如印,田家亮,韩伟,田晓滨,王金武,戴尅戎. 数字化模拟技术应用于全膝关节置换术前假体尺寸预测的临床探讨[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2016, 36(9): 1292-. |
[12] | 张恒辉,曲扬,陈晓军,戴尅戎,王燎,艾松涛. 数字化技术辅助的中国人髋臼朝向三维测量[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2016, 36(9): 1311-. |
[13] | 刘慧明,李国红,赵列宾,董斌,陆骆,周莹霞. 电子监测与量表评估2型糖尿病患者服药依从性的研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2016, 36(6): 901-. |
[14] | 陈琪,王泽洲,陈宇红,周莹霞,陆骆,陈旻洁,李钟仁,费健,蔡泳. 上海市三级医院门诊患者糖尿病管理自我效能量表的信度与效度评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2016, 36(5): 724-. |
[15] | 王宇,苑成梅,孙霞,等. 针对轻症抑郁患者的团体认知行为治疗及疗效因子[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2015, 35(8): 1136-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||