冻融胚胎移植对子代的近、远期影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.05.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

冻融胚胎移植（frozen-thawed embryo transfer，FET）是常用辅助生殖技术之一。由于FET具有累积妊娠率高、卵巢过度刺激综合征发生率低等优势，通过该项技术出生的子代数量逐年增加。多项研究提示FET子代发生围产期早产、低出生体质量、小于胎龄儿等的风险低于新鲜胚胎移植周期出生的子代，也有证据显示FET子代出现巨大儿、大于胎龄儿等的风险较高；同时，亦有研究针对FET子代在儿童期及成人期的长期健康状况进行报道。该文就FET对子代的近、远期影响及其原因进行综述。

关键词: 辅助生殖技术, 冻融胚胎移植, 子代, 近期影响, 远期影响

Abstract:

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) is one of the commonly used assisted reproductive technology. Because FET has the advantages of high cumulative pregnancy rate and low incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, the number of offspring born through this technology is increasing year by year. Many studies have shown that the risks of preterm delivery, low birth weight and small for gestation age of FET offspring are lower than those of the offspring born in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. There is also evidence that the risks of macrosomia and large for gestational age of FET offspring are higher. At the same time, there are also reports on the long-term health status of FET offspring in childhood and adulthood. This paper reviews the short-term and long-term effects of FET on offspring and the causes.

Key words: assisted reproductive technology (ART), frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), offspring, short-term effect, long-term effect

中图分类号:

R711.6

秦宁馨, 赵文龙, 周志阳, 施炜慧, 吴琰婷, 黄荷凤. 冻融胚胎移植对子代的近、远期影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(5): 653-658.

Ning-xin QIN, Wen-long ZHAO, Zhi-yang ZHOU, Wei-hui SHI, Yan-ting WU, He-feng HUANG. Short- and long-term effects of frozen-thawed embryo transfer on offspring[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(5): 653-658.

参考文献 60

1	European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM), European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Kupka MS, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE[J]. Hum Reprod, 2016, 31(2): 233-248.
2	Saito H, Jwa SC, Kuwahara A, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a summary report for 2015 by The Ethics Committee of The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology[J]. Reprod Med Biol, 2018, 17(1): 20-28.
3	贺木兰, 孙晓溪. 辅助生殖技术子代安全性及对策思考[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2019, 39(10): 838-843.
4	Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo[J]. Nature, 1983, 305(5936): 707-709.
5	Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2008, 90(1): 186-193.
6	Wong KM, van Wely M, Mol F, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 3: CD011184.
7	Jain V, Singhal A. Catch up growth in low birth weight infants: striking a healthy balance[J]. Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 2012, 13(2): 141-147.
8	Franz AP, Bolat GU, Bolat H, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and very preterm/very low birth weight: a meta-analysis[J]. Pediatrics, 2018, 141(1): e20171645.
9	Petrou S, Sach T, Davidson L. The long-term costs of preterm birth and low birth weight: results of a systematic review[J]. Child Care Health Dev, 2001, 27(2): 97-115.
10	Turkgeldi E, Yagmur H, Seyhan A, et al. Short and long term outcomes of children conceived with assisted reproductive technology[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016, 207: 129-136.
11	ADAC Smith, Tilling K, Lawlor DA, et al. Live birth rates and perinatal outcomes when all embryos are frozen compared with conventional fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study of 337, 148 in vitro fertilisation cycles[J]. BMC Med, 2019, 17(1): 202.
12	Vidal M, Vellvé K, González-Comadran M, et al. Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a Catalan cohort study based on 14, 262 newborns[J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 107(4): 940-947.
13	Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Amalraj Raja E, et al. Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2018, 24(1): 35-58.
14	Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 98(2): 368-377.e1-9.
15	Araujo Júnior E, Peixoto AB, Zamarian AC, et al. Macrosomia[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 38: 83-96.
16	Qiao YJ, Zhang T, Liu HY, et al. Joint association of birth weight and physical activity/sedentary behavior with obesity in children ages 9-11 years from 12 countries[J]. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2017, 25(6): 1091-1097.
17	Kang M, Yoo JE, Kim K, et al. Associations between birth weight, obesity, fat mass and lean mass in Korean adolescents: the Fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(2): e018039.
18	Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, et al. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Pediatrics, 2005, 115(3): e290-e296.
19	Ginström Ernstad E, Wennerholm UB, Khatibi A, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcome after frozen embryo transfer: increased risks in programmed cycles[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221(2): 126.e1-126.e18.
20	Berntsen S, Pinborg A. Large for gestational age and macrosomia in singletons born after frozen/thawed embryo transfer (FET) in assisted reproductive technology (ART)[J]. Birth Defects Res, 2018, 110(8): 630-643.
21	Wei DM, Liu JY, Sun Y, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10178): 1310-1318.
22	Spijkers S, Lens JW, Schats R, et al. Fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer compared to natural conception: differences in perinatal outcome[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2017, 82(6): 538-546.
23	Pinborg A, Henningsen AA, Loft A, et al. Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?[J]. Hum Reprod, 2014, 29(3): 618-627.
24	Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM, et al. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(2): 209-218.
25	Sha TT, Yin XQ, Cheng WW, et al. Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 109(2): 330-342.e9.
26	Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M, et al. Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JBRA Assist Reprod, 2018, 22(3): 253-260.
27	Goffin SM, Derraik JGB, Groom KM, et al. Maternal pre-eclampsia and long-term offspring health: is there a shadow cast?[J]. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2018, 12: 11-15.
28	Wikland M, Hardarson T, Hillensjö T, et al. Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts[J]. Hum Reprod, 2010, 25(7): 1699-1707.
29	Kato O, Kawasaki N, Bodri D, et al. Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6 623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012, 161(1): 46-50.
30	Beltran Anzola A, Pauly V, Montjean D, et al. No difference in congenital anomalies prevalence irrespective of insemination methods and freezing procedure: cohort study over fourteen years of an ART population in the south of France[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2017, 34(7): 867-876.
31	Yin L, Hang F, Gu LJ, et al. Analysis of birth defects among children 3 years after conception through assisted reproductive technology in China[J]. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol, 2013, 97(11): 744-749.
32	Ooki S. Birth defects after assisted reproductive technology according to the method of treatment in Japan: nationwide data between 2004 and 2012[J]. Environ Health Prev Med, 2015, 20(6): 460-465.
33	Belva F, Henriet S, van den Abbeel E, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles[J]. Hum Reprod, 2008, 23(10): 2227-2238.
34	Morin SJ, Seli E. Assisted reproductive technology and origins of disease: the clinical realities and implications[J]. Semin Reprod Med, 2018, 36(3/4): 195-203.
35	Olivennes F, Schneider Z, Remy V, et al. Perinatal outcome and follow-up of 82 children aged 1-9 years old conceived from cryopreserved embryos[J]. Hum Reprod, 1996, 11(7): 1565-1568.
36	Nakajo Y, Fukunaga N, Fuchinoue K, et al. Physical and mental development of children after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer[J]. Reprod Med Biol, 2004, 3(2): 63-67.
37	Hann M, Roberts SA, D'Souza SW, et al. The growth of assisted reproductive treatment-conceived children from birth to 5 years: a national cohort study[J]. BMC Med, 2018, 16(1): 224.
38	周经委, 吴蓉花, 郭里, 等. 玻璃化冷冻胚胎与新鲜胚胎移植对子代小鼠生长发育的影响[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2015, 28(6): 569-573.
39	Sutcliffe AG, D'Souza SW, Cadman J, et al. Outcome in children from cryopreserved embryos[J]. Arch Dis Child, 1995, 72(4): 290-293.
40	Wennerholm UB, Albertsson-Wikland K, Bergh C, et al. Postnatal growth and health in children born after cryopreservation as embryos[J]. Lancet, 1998, 351(9109): 1085-1090.
41	Pelkonen S, Gissler M, Koivurova S, et al. Physical health of singleton children born after frozen embryo transfer using slow freezing: a 3-year follow-up study[J]. Hum Reprod, 2015, 30(10): 2411-2418.
42	Spangmose AL, Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, et al. Academic performance in adolescents aged 15-16 years born after frozen embryo transfer compared with fresh embryo transfer: a nationwide registry-based cohort study[J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(2): 261-269.
43	Green MP, Mouat F, Miles HL, et al. Phenotypic differences in children conceived from fresh and thawed embryos in in vitro fertilization compared with naturally conceived children[J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 99(7): 1898-1904.
44	Ibáñez L, Lopez-Bermejo A, Diaz M, et al. Catch-up growth in girls born small for gestational age precedes childhood progression to high adiposity[J]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96(1): 220-223.
45	Hargreave M, Jensen A, Hansen MK, et al. Association between fertility treatment and cancer risk in children[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(22): 2203-2210.
46	Hu XL, Feng C, Lin XH, et al. High maternal serum estradiol environment in the first trimester is associated with the increased risk of small-for-gestational-age birth[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014, 99(6): 2217-2224.
47	Liu SY, Kuang YP, Wu Y, et al. High oestradiol concentration after ovarian stimulation is associated with lower maternal serum β-HCG concentration and neonatal birth weight[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2017, 35(2): 189-196.
48	Cai J, Liu L, Xu Y, et al. Supraphysiological estradiol level in ovarian stimulation cycles affects the birthweight of neonates conceived through subsequent frozen-thawed cycles: a retrospective study[J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(6): 711-718.
49	Zhang WL, Ma YF, Xiong YJ, et al. Supraphysiological serum oestradiol negatively affects birthweight in cryopreserved embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2019, 39(2): 312-320.
50	Jin M, Lv PP, Yu TT, et al. IGFBP1 involved in the decreased birth weight due to fetal high estrogen exposure in mice[J]. Biol Reprod, 2016, 95(5): 96.
51	Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2014, 20(6): 808-821.
52	Jiang Z, Wang Y, Lin J, et al. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 44: 90-104.
53	Zhao XM, Du WH, Hao HS, et al. Effect of vitrification on promoter methylation and the expression of pluripotency and differentiation genes in mouse blastocysts[J]. Mol Reprod Dev, 2012, 79(7): 445-450.
54	Shaw L, Sneddon SF, Brison DR, et al. Comparison of gene expression in fresh and frozen-thawed human preimplantation embryos[J]. Reproduction, 2012, 144(5): 569-582.
55	DeAngelis AM, Martini AE, Owen CM. Assisted reproductive technology and epigenetics[J]. Semin Reproductive Med, 2018, 36(3/4): 221-232.
56	Derakhshan-Horeh M, Abolhassani F, Jafarpour F, et al. Vitrification at Day3 stage appears not to affect the methylation status of H19/IGF2 differentially methylated region of in vitro produced human blastocysts[J]. Cryobiology, 2016, 73(2): 168-174.
57	Wang ZY, Xu L, He FF. Embryo vitrification affects the methylation of the H19/Igf2 differentially methylated domain and the expression of H19 and Igf2[J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93(8): 2729-2733.
58	Maldonado MB, Penteado JC, Faccio BM, et al. Changes in tri-methylation profile of lysines 4 and 27 of histone H3 in bovine blastocysts after cryopreservation[J]. Cryobiology, 2015, 71(3): 481-485.
59	Gu F, Li SZ, Zheng LY, et al. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following vitrification versus slow-freezing of embryos: a multicenter cohort study using propensity score analysis[J]. Hum Reprod, 2019, 34(9): 1788-1798.
60	Jing S, Li XF, Zhang SP, et al. Increased pregnancy complications following frozen-thawed embryo transfer during an artificial cycle[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2019, 36(5): 925-933.

[1]	张怡静1, 2，徐健1, 2. 妊娠期维生素A缺乏对子代神经发育影响的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(09): 1277-1282.
[2]	张群芳 1, 2，刘芸 1, 2，陈国勇 1，何凌云 1. 冻融囊胚移植影响子宫内膜异位症患者妊娠结局的相关因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(8): 898-.
[3]	吴轲 1，孙涵潇 2，蔡美琴 1. 类胡萝卜素对母婴健康影响的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(8): 929-.
[4]	吴正沐 1，陈松长 2，徐晨明 2，金丽 1. 男性叶酸代谢功能与辅助生殖技术结局的相关性研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(10): 1229-.
[5]	黄颖，赵立，方芳，甄琴，严率，王育璠. 妊娠期糖尿病对母子的远期影响及产后随访策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(09): 1373-.
[6]	邹虹，姜小雪，王寒冰，等. 妊娠期糖尿病对大鼠雌性子代缺血再灌注后心脏收缩功能的影响及其机制[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(02): 211-.
[7]	吴正沐，陆湘，吴煜，等. 辅助生殖治疗中染色体多态性对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 34(8): 1210-.
[8]	汪小波, 胡洪亮, 刘勇, 等. 染色体核型分析对男性不育诊疗与捐精筛查的意义[J]. , 2012, 32(8): 968-.
[9]	丁瑜, 高宇, 施蓉, 等. 妊娠中末期邻苯二甲酸(2-乙基己基) 酯暴露对母鼠妊娠结局及子鼠生长发育的影响[J]. , 2011, 31(2): 225-.
[10]	沈丽, 殷峻, 周军. 抗性淀粉干预对糖尿病大鼠子代糖代谢的影响[J]. , 2011, 31(12): 1707-.
[11]	牛志宏, 冯云, 孙贻娟, 等. 激素替代—冻融胚胎移植周期血清雌二醇监测的意义[J]. , 2009, 29(8): 963-.