上海交通大学学报(医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 1186-1193.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.09.013
• 临床护理专题 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2023-05-24
接受日期:
2023-06-19
出版日期:
2023-09-28
发布日期:
2023-09-28
通讯作者:
杨艳
E-mail:zhu_hanjing@163.com;yang2021@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:
朱涵菁(1998—),女,硕士生;电子信箱:zhu_hanjing@163.com。
基金资助:
ZHU Hanjing1(), YIN Hongfan2, YOU Sijie1, YANG Yan1,2()
Received:
2023-05-24
Accepted:
2023-06-19
Online:
2023-09-28
Published:
2023-09-28
Contact:
YANG Yan
E-mail:zhu_hanjing@163.com;yang2021@sjtu.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
目的·基于不悦症状理论,调查前列腺癌患者内分泌治疗相关不良反应现状,并识别不同潜在类别及人群特异性。方法·采用便利抽样法,选取2022年6—9月上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院泌尿科的274例前列腺癌内分泌治疗患者。采用基本信息调查表、简体中文版老年男性症状量表、中文版Mishel 疾病不确定感量表、领悟社会支持量表、中文版疾病心理社会适应量表对内分泌治疗相关不良反应进行调查,并对结果进行潜在剖面分析。采用t检验和方差分析各亚组中人群的特征,采用LSD法进行两两间的多重比较,采用多元Logistic回归探索前列腺癌患者内分泌治疗相关不良反应的影响因素,使用Mplus 8.3进行潜在剖面分析,识别前列腺癌患者内分泌治疗相关不良反应的潜在分类。结果·前列腺癌患者内分泌治疗相关不良反应可分为轻症状组(n=96,35.0%)、中等症状组(n=111,40.5%)及重症状组(n=67,24.5%)3个类别。相比于轻症状组患者,中等症状组患者在心理社会适应(OR=1.038,95%CI 1.018~1.060,P=0.000)和是否进行基因检测(OR=0.336,95%CI 0.129~0.879,P=0.026)因素上具有明显差异。相比于轻症状组患者,重症状组患者在心理社会适应(OR=1.027,95%CI 1.003~1.051,P=0.024)、疾病不确定感(OR=1.021,95%CI 1.005~1.038,P=0.011)、M期(OR=0.354,95%CI 0.136~0.924,P=0.034)、前列腺特异性抗原(prostate specific antigen,PSA)(OR=0.142,95%CI 0.042~0.480,P=0.002;OR=0.275,95%CI 0.083~0.914,P=0.035)因素上具有明显差异。结论·前列腺癌内分泌治疗相关不良反应发生率高,患者可根据不良反应分为3个潜在类别,不同类别的前列腺癌内分泌治疗患者在疾病转移、PSA水平、是否进行基因检测、疾病不确定感和心理社会适应状况上存在显著差异。医护人员应评估前列腺癌内分泌治疗患者不同的人口社会学背景、疾病特异性和心理社会状态,顺应精准医学背景,根据患者的特质提供针对性的支持,帮助他们掌握自我管理技能并积极应对治疗的不良反应。
中图分类号:
朱涵菁, 殷弘凡, 尤思洁, 杨艳. 前列腺癌患者内分泌治疗相关不良反应的潜在剖面分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(9): 1186-1193.
ZHU Hanjing, YIN Hongfan, YOU Sijie, YANG Yan. Latent profile analysis of adverse effects associated with endocrine therapy in prostate cancer patients based on the theory of unpleasant symptoms[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(9): 1186-1193.
Item | Category of potential profile | χ2/F | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mild symptom (n=96) | Moderate symptom (n=111) | Severe symptom (n=67) | |||
Age/n (%) | 10.475 | 0.033 | |||
≤65 year | 29 (30.2) | 32 (28.8) | 22 (32.8) | ||
>65 year and≤75 year | 39 (40.6) | 63 (56.8) | 36 (53.7) | ||
>75 year | 28 (29.2) | 16 (14.4) | 9 (13.6) | ||
Annual treatment cost as a percentage of monthly per capita household income/n (%) | 10.175 | 0.038 | |||
≤30% | 51 (53.1) | 65 (58.6) | 27 (40.3) | ||
>30% and ≤60% | 24 (25.0) | 25 (22.5) | 14 (20.9) | ||
>60% | 21 (21.9) | 21 (18.9) | 26 (38.8) | ||
T stage/n (%) | 12.175 | 0.016 | |||
T2 | 22 (22.9) | 32 (28.8) | 6 (8.9) | ||
T3 | 45 (46.8) | 38 (34.2) | 32 (47.8) | ||
T4 | 29 (30.3) | 41 (37.0) | 29 (43.3) | ||
N stage/n (%) | 9.104 | 0.011 | |||
N0 | 56 (58.3) | 54 (48.6) | 23 (34.3) | ||
N1 | 40 (41.7) | 57 (51.4) | 44 (65.7) | ||
M stage/n (%) | 13.923 | 0.001 | |||
M0 | 58 (60.4) | 59 (53.2) | 21 (31.3) | ||
M1 | 38 (39.6) | 52 (46.8) | 46 (68.7) | ||
PSA value/n (%) | 30.292 | 0.000 | |||
≤0.01 ng·mL-1 | 34 (35.4) | 37 (33.3) | 21 (31.3) | ||
>0.01 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 0.2 ng·mL-1 | 30 (31.2) | 41 (36.9) | 7 (10.4) | ||
>0.2 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 2 ng·mL-1 | 19 (19.8) | 11 (9.9) | 10 (14.9) | ||
>2 ng·mL-1 | 13 (13.6) | 22 (19.9) | 29 (43.4) | ||
Gene detection/n (%) | 9.719 | 0.045 | |||
Not done | 45 (46.9) | 59 (53.2) | 30 (44.8) | ||
Not mutated | 26 (27.1) | 14 (12.6) | 10 (14.9) | ||
Mutated | 25 (26.0) | 38 (34.2) | 27 (40.3) | ||
Psychosocial adjustment score/score | 49.94±27.046 | 64.5±12.803 | 65.93±14.506 | 50.100 | 0.000 |
Perceived social support score/score | 59.86±21.848 | 51.00±22.623 | 46.67±24.319 | 14.233 | 0.001 |
Uncertainty in illness score/score | 88.16±31.145 | 99.67±22.576 | 110.49±21.970 | 47.881 | 0.000 |
表1 患者的一般资料及不同PCa内分泌治疗相关不良反应潜在类别的特征分析(N=274)
Tab 1 General information of patients with endocrine therapy in prostate cancer and characterization of potential categories of adverse reactions associated with different endocrine therapies for prostate cancer (N=274)
Item | Category of potential profile | χ2/F | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mild symptom (n=96) | Moderate symptom (n=111) | Severe symptom (n=67) | |||
Age/n (%) | 10.475 | 0.033 | |||
≤65 year | 29 (30.2) | 32 (28.8) | 22 (32.8) | ||
>65 year and≤75 year | 39 (40.6) | 63 (56.8) | 36 (53.7) | ||
>75 year | 28 (29.2) | 16 (14.4) | 9 (13.6) | ||
Annual treatment cost as a percentage of monthly per capita household income/n (%) | 10.175 | 0.038 | |||
≤30% | 51 (53.1) | 65 (58.6) | 27 (40.3) | ||
>30% and ≤60% | 24 (25.0) | 25 (22.5) | 14 (20.9) | ||
>60% | 21 (21.9) | 21 (18.9) | 26 (38.8) | ||
T stage/n (%) | 12.175 | 0.016 | |||
T2 | 22 (22.9) | 32 (28.8) | 6 (8.9) | ||
T3 | 45 (46.8) | 38 (34.2) | 32 (47.8) | ||
T4 | 29 (30.3) | 41 (37.0) | 29 (43.3) | ||
N stage/n (%) | 9.104 | 0.011 | |||
N0 | 56 (58.3) | 54 (48.6) | 23 (34.3) | ||
N1 | 40 (41.7) | 57 (51.4) | 44 (65.7) | ||
M stage/n (%) | 13.923 | 0.001 | |||
M0 | 58 (60.4) | 59 (53.2) | 21 (31.3) | ||
M1 | 38 (39.6) | 52 (46.8) | 46 (68.7) | ||
PSA value/n (%) | 30.292 | 0.000 | |||
≤0.01 ng·mL-1 | 34 (35.4) | 37 (33.3) | 21 (31.3) | ||
>0.01 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 0.2 ng·mL-1 | 30 (31.2) | 41 (36.9) | 7 (10.4) | ||
>0.2 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 2 ng·mL-1 | 19 (19.8) | 11 (9.9) | 10 (14.9) | ||
>2 ng·mL-1 | 13 (13.6) | 22 (19.9) | 29 (43.4) | ||
Gene detection/n (%) | 9.719 | 0.045 | |||
Not done | 45 (46.9) | 59 (53.2) | 30 (44.8) | ||
Not mutated | 26 (27.1) | 14 (12.6) | 10 (14.9) | ||
Mutated | 25 (26.0) | 38 (34.2) | 27 (40.3) | ||
Psychosocial adjustment score/score | 49.94±27.046 | 64.5±12.803 | 65.93±14.506 | 50.100 | 0.000 |
Perceived social support score/score | 59.86±21.848 | 51.00±22.623 | 46.67±24.319 | 14.233 | 0.001 |
Uncertainty in illness score/score | 88.16±31.145 | 99.67±22.576 | 110.49±21.970 | 47.881 | 0.000 |
Number of profiles | AIC | BIC | aBIC | IE | P value (LMRT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 012.070 | 5 033.749 | 5 014.724 | — | — |
2 | 4 738.516 | 4 774.648 | 4 742.940 | 0.861 | 0.003 4 |
3 | 4 601.870 | 4 652.454 | 4 608.063 | 0.867 | 0.002 4 |
4 | 4 534.848 | 4 599.884 | 4 542.810 | 0.877 | 0.167 4 |
5 | 4 489.916 | 4 569.404 | 4 499.647 | 0.886 | 0.199 3 |
表2 不同类别的潜在剖面模型拟合指数
Tab 2 Fitting indices of potential profile models for different categories
Number of profiles | AIC | BIC | aBIC | IE | P value (LMRT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 012.070 | 5 033.749 | 5 014.724 | — | — |
2 | 4 738.516 | 4 774.648 | 4 742.940 | 0.861 | 0.003 4 |
3 | 4 601.870 | 4 652.454 | 4 608.063 | 0.867 | 0.002 4 |
4 | 4 534.848 | 4 599.884 | 4 542.810 | 0.877 | 0.167 4 |
5 | 4 489.916 | 4 569.404 | 4 499.647 | 0.886 | 0.199 3 |
Category of potential profiles | Probability of belonging to category | ||
---|---|---|---|
Category 1 | Category 2 | Category 3 | |
Category 1 | 92.7 | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Category 2 | 4.5 | 95.2 | 3.0 |
Category 3 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 94.3 |
表3 3个潜在剖面归属概率(%)
Tab 3 Probability of belonging to the 3 potential profiles (%)
Category of potential profiles | Probability of belonging to category | ||
---|---|---|---|
Category 1 | Category 2 | Category 3 | |
Category 1 | 92.7 | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Category 2 | 4.5 | 95.2 | 3.0 |
Category 3 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 94.3 |
Item | Assignment | Original value |
---|---|---|
Age | 1 | ≤65 year |
2 | >65 year and ≤ 75 year | |
3 | >75 year | |
Annual treatment cost as a percentage of monthly per capita household income | 1 | ≤30% |
2 | >30% and ≤60% | |
3 | >60% | |
T stage | 2 | T2 |
3 | T3 | |
4 | T4 | |
N stage | 0 | N0 |
1 | N1 | |
M stage | 0 | M0 |
1 | M1 | |
PSA value | 1 | ≤0.01 ng·mL-1 |
2 | >0.01 ng·mL-1 and ≤0.2 ng·mL-1 | |
3 | >0.2 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 2 ng·mL-1 | |
4 | >2 ng·mL-1 | |
Gene detection | 0 | Not mutated |
1 | Not done | |
2 | Mutated | |
Psychosocial adjustment score | Actual value | ‒ |
Perceived social support score | Actual value | ‒ |
Uncertainty in illncss score | Actual value | ‒ |
表4 多元逐步回归自变量赋值表(n=274)
Tab 4 Variable assignment for the multi-variable Logistic analysis (n=274)
Item | Assignment | Original value |
---|---|---|
Age | 1 | ≤65 year |
2 | >65 year and ≤ 75 year | |
3 | >75 year | |
Annual treatment cost as a percentage of monthly per capita household income | 1 | ≤30% |
2 | >30% and ≤60% | |
3 | >60% | |
T stage | 2 | T2 |
3 | T3 | |
4 | T4 | |
N stage | 0 | N0 |
1 | N1 | |
M stage | 0 | M0 |
1 | M1 | |
PSA value | 1 | ≤0.01 ng·mL-1 |
2 | >0.01 ng·mL-1 and ≤0.2 ng·mL-1 | |
3 | >0.2 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 2 ng·mL-1 | |
4 | >2 ng·mL-1 | |
Gene detection | 0 | Not mutated |
1 | Not done | |
2 | Mutated | |
Psychosocial adjustment score | Actual value | ‒ |
Perceived social support score | Actual value | ‒ |
Uncertainty in illncss score | Actual value | ‒ |
Item | Moderate symptom | Severe symptom | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | Wald | P value | OR (95%CI) | β | SE | Wald | P value | OR (95%CI) | |
Constant | -3.597 | 1.248 | 8.302 | 0.004 | - | -2.660 | 1.341 | 3.937 | 0.047 | |
Psychosocial adjustment score | 0.038 | 0.010 | 13.279 | 0.000 | 1.038 (1.018‒1.060) | 0.026 | 0.012 | 5.065 | 0.024 | 1.027 (1.003‒1.051) |
Perceived social support score | -0.002 | 0.008 | 0.047 | 0.827 | 0.998 (0.983‒1.014) | -0.008 | 0.009 | 0.773 | 0.379 | 0.992 (0.975‒1.010) |
Uncertainty in illncss score | 0.009 | 0.008 | 1.400 | 0.237 | 1.009 (0.994‒1.024) | 0.021 | 0.008 | 6.532 | 0.011 | 1.021 (1.005‒1.038) |
M Stage | ||||||||||
M0 | -0.588 | 0.425 | 1.912 | 0.167 | 0.555 (0.241‒1.278) | -1.037 | 0.489 | 4.499 | 0.034 | 0.354 (0.136‒0.924) |
M1 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
PSA value | ||||||||||
≤0.01 ng·mL-1 | -0.062 | 0.520 | 0.014 | 0.905 | 0.940 (0.339‒2.605) | -0.770 | 0.528 | 2.128 | 0.145 | 0.463 (0.164‒1.303) |
>0.01 ng·mL-1 and ≤0.2 ng·mL-1 | -0.126 | 0.525 | 0.057 | 0.811 | 0.882 (0.315‒2.467) | -1.953 | 0.622 | 9.859 | 0.002 | 0.142 (0.042‒0.480) |
>0.2 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 2 ng·mL-1 | -1.238 | 0.611 | 4.110 | 0.043 | 0.290 (0.088‒0.960) | -1.292 | 0.613 | 4.442 | 0.035 | 0.275 (0.083‒0.914) |
>2 ng·mL-1 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
Gene detection | ||||||||||
Not done | -1.090 | 0.490 | 4.945 | 0.026 | 0.336 (0.129‒0.879) | -0.569 | 0.575 | 0.980 | 0.322 | 0.566 (0.183‒1.746) |
Not mutated | -0.555 | 0.407 | 1.859 | 0.173 | 0.574 (0.259‒1.275) | -0.323 | 0.470 | 0.473 | 0.492 | 0.724 (0.288‒1.819) |
Mutated | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
表5 潜在类别影响因素的多元Logistic回归
Tab 5 Multi-variable logistic regression analysis of potential categorical influencing factors
Item | Moderate symptom | Severe symptom | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | Wald | P value | OR (95%CI) | β | SE | Wald | P value | OR (95%CI) | |
Constant | -3.597 | 1.248 | 8.302 | 0.004 | - | -2.660 | 1.341 | 3.937 | 0.047 | |
Psychosocial adjustment score | 0.038 | 0.010 | 13.279 | 0.000 | 1.038 (1.018‒1.060) | 0.026 | 0.012 | 5.065 | 0.024 | 1.027 (1.003‒1.051) |
Perceived social support score | -0.002 | 0.008 | 0.047 | 0.827 | 0.998 (0.983‒1.014) | -0.008 | 0.009 | 0.773 | 0.379 | 0.992 (0.975‒1.010) |
Uncertainty in illncss score | 0.009 | 0.008 | 1.400 | 0.237 | 1.009 (0.994‒1.024) | 0.021 | 0.008 | 6.532 | 0.011 | 1.021 (1.005‒1.038) |
M Stage | ||||||||||
M0 | -0.588 | 0.425 | 1.912 | 0.167 | 0.555 (0.241‒1.278) | -1.037 | 0.489 | 4.499 | 0.034 | 0.354 (0.136‒0.924) |
M1 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
PSA value | ||||||||||
≤0.01 ng·mL-1 | -0.062 | 0.520 | 0.014 | 0.905 | 0.940 (0.339‒2.605) | -0.770 | 0.528 | 2.128 | 0.145 | 0.463 (0.164‒1.303) |
>0.01 ng·mL-1 and ≤0.2 ng·mL-1 | -0.126 | 0.525 | 0.057 | 0.811 | 0.882 (0.315‒2.467) | -1.953 | 0.622 | 9.859 | 0.002 | 0.142 (0.042‒0.480) |
>0.2 ng·mL-1 and ≤ 2 ng·mL-1 | -1.238 | 0.611 | 4.110 | 0.043 | 0.290 (0.088‒0.960) | -1.292 | 0.613 | 4.442 | 0.035 | 0.275 (0.083‒0.914) |
>2 ng·mL-1 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
Gene detection | ||||||||||
Not done | -1.090 | 0.490 | 4.945 | 0.026 | 0.336 (0.129‒0.879) | -0.569 | 0.575 | 0.980 | 0.322 | 0.566 (0.183‒1.746) |
Not mutated | -0.555 | 0.407 | 1.859 | 0.173 | 0.574 (0.259‒1.275) | -0.323 | 0.470 | 0.473 | 0.492 | 0.724 (0.288‒1.819) |
Mutated | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - | - |
1 | SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, JEMAL A. Cancer statistics, 2020[J]. CA A Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1): 7-30. |
2 | LIU X, YU C, BI Y, et al. Trends and age-period-cohort effect on incidence and mortality of prostate cancer from 1990 to 2017 in China[J]. Public Health, 2019, 172: 70-80. |
3 | 赵劲歌, 曾浩. 2020年欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)前列腺癌指南更新荟萃与解读[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2020, 25(9): 832-836, 841. |
ZHAO J G, ZENG H. Update of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for prostate cancer in 2020[J]. J Mod Urol, 2020, 25(9):832-836,841. | |
4 | GAVIN A T, DRUMMOND F J, DONNELLY C, et al. Patient-reported ‘ever had’ and ‘current’ long-term physical symptoms after prostate cancer treatments[J]. BJU Int, 2015, 116(3): 397-406. |
5 | OCCHIPINTI S, ZAJDLEWICZ L, COUGHLIN G D, et al. A prospective study of psychological distress after prostate cancer surgery[J]. Psycho-oncology, 2019, 28(12): 2389-2395. |
6 | SHARPLEY C F, CHRISTIE D R H, BITSIKA V. Depression and prostate cancer: implications for urologists and oncologists[J]. Nat Rev Urol, 2020, 17(10): 571-585. |
7 | ZHAO X X, SUN M, YANG Y. Effects of social support, hope and resilience on depressive symptoms within 18 months after diagnosis of prostate cancer[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2021, 19(1): 1-10. |
8 | LENZ E R, PUGH L C, MILLIGAN R A, et al. The middle-range theory of unpleasant symptoms: an update[J]. ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 1997, 19(3): 14-27. |
9 | 邵聪聪. 基于不悦症状理论肺癌患者的癌因性疲乏现状及相关因素[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2021. |
SHAO C C. Current status of cancer-caused fatigue and related factors in lung cancer patients based on unpleasant symptom theory[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2021. | |
10 | 朱涵菁, 袁秀群, 杨艳. 生理-心理-社会模式下前列腺癌患者护理的研究进展[J]. 上海护理, 2022, 22(2): 46-49. |
ZHU H J, YUAN X Q, YANG Y. Research progress of prostate cancer patient care under physiological-psychological-social model[J]. Shanghai Nursing Journal, 2022, 22(2): 46-49. | |
11 | 仲艳. 前列腺癌内分泌治疗患者生活质量现状及影响因素研究[D]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2021. |
ZHONG Y. Quality of life and its influencing factors in prostate cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy[D]. Shenyang: China Medical University, 2021. | |
12 | 尹奎, 彭坚, 张君. 潜在剖面分析在组织行为领域中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1056-1070. |
YIN K, PENG J, ZHANG J. The application of latent profile analysis in the field of organizational behavior[J]. Adv Psychol Sci,2020, 28(7): 1056-1070. | |
13 | 李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018. |
LI Z, LIU Y. Research methods in nursing[M]. 2nd edition. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2018. | |
14 | HEINEMANN L A J, SAAD F, ZIMMERMANN T, et al. The Aging Males′ Symptoms (AMS) scale: update and compilation of international versions[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2003, 1: 15. |
15 | 杨锐, 陆箴琦, 顾晓锋. 简体中文版老年男性症状量表的信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(5): 31-34. |
YANG R, LU Z Q, GU X F. Reliability testing of the Simplified Chinese version of the Geriatric Male Symptom Scale [J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2020, 35(5): 31-34. | |
16 | HILTON B A. The Uncertainty Stress Scale: its development and psychometric properties[J]. Can J Nurs Res, 1994, 26(3): 15-30. |
17 | 汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[M]. 增订版. 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社, 1999. |
WANG X D, WANG X L, MA H. Rating scales for mental health (updated edition) [M]. Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Journal, 1999. | |
18 | 姚静静. 癌症患者适应水平的横断面调查及其预测因素分析[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2013. |
YAO J J. A cross-sectional survey of cancer patients′ adjustment levels and analysis of their predictors [D]. Shanghai: Second Military Medical University, 2013. | |
19 | NORIEGA ESQUIVES B, LEE T K, MORENO P I, et al. Symptom burden profiles in men with advanced prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy[J]. J Behav Med, 2022, 45(3): 366-377. |
20 | 朱晓丹, 陆箴琦, 顾晓锋. 前列腺癌患者症状负担及影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2019, 35(15): 1168-1172. |
ZHU X D, LU Z Q, GU X F. Analysis of symptom burden and influencing factors in patients with prostate cancer[J]. Chin J Prac Nurs, 2019, 35(15): 1168-1172. | |
21 | HIGANO C S. Sexuality and intimacy after definitive treatment and subsequent androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(30): 3720-3725. |
22 | ARAP W. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(2): 200-201. |
23 | WEI Y, WU J L, GU W J, et al. Prognostic value of germline DNA repair gene mutations in de novo metastatic and castration-sensitive prostate cancer[J]. Oncologist, 2020, 25(7): e1042-e1050. |
24 | LI J, XU C L, LEE H J, et al. A genomic and epigenomic atlas of prostate cancer in Asian populations[J]. Nature, 2020, 580(7801): 93-99. |
25 | PITUSKIN E, FAIRCHILD A. Prostate cancer with bone metastases: addressing chronic pain from the perspective of the radiation oncology nurse practitioner[J]. Semin Oncol Nurs, 2021, 37(4): 151175. |
26 | FERNANDEZ-ARAQUE A, GOMEZ-CASTRO J, GIAQUINTA-ARANDA A, et al. Mishel′s model of uncertainty describing categories and subcategories in fibromyalgia patients, a scoping review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(11): 3756. |
27 | ZHANG Y Z. Uncertainty in illness: theory review, application, and extension[J]. Oncol Nurs Forum, 2017, 44(6): 645-649. |
28 | LILJA H, ULMERT D, VICKERS A J. Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer: prediction, detection and monitoring[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2008, 8(4): 268-278. |
29 | HAN S, WOO S, KIM Y I, et al. Concordance between response assessment using prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and serum prostate-specific antigen levels after systemic treatment in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(4): 663. |
30 | DAVID M K, LESLIE S W. Prostate Specific Antigen [M]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing LLC, 2022. |
31 | CHAMBERS S K, NG S K, BAADE P, et al. Trajectories of quality of life, life satisfaction, and psychological adjustment after prostate cancer[J]. Psycho-oncology, 2017, 26(10): 1576-1585. |
32 | 刘莹莹, 李惠艳, 苑冬鹤. 老年前列腺癌病人支持性照顾需求与生活质量的纵向研究 [J]. 安徽医药, 2019, 23(10): 1987-1990. |
LIU Y Y, LI H Y, YUAN D H. A longitudinal study of supportive care needs and quality of life in elderly prostate cancer patients[J]. Anhui Med Pharm J, 2019, 23(10): 1987-1990. | |
33 | WALSH E A, ANTONI M H, POPOK P J, et al. Effects of a randomized-controlled trial of cognitive behavioral stress management: psychosocial adaptation and immune status in men with early-stage prostate cancer[J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2022, 79: 128-134. |
[1] | 严叶青, 梁胜, 杨斌, 邹仁健, 马玉飞, 蔡利生, 王辉, 傅宏亮. 18F-MD-PSMA PET/CT显像在中高危前列腺癌初始分期中的应用价值[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(7): 873-881. |
[2] | 王慧, 赵莹, 温丽蓉, 曹军, 羊继平, 原永明. 前列腺癌患者血液中PSA、TAP、MACC1的表达及其诊断价值[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(4): 496-501. |
[3] | 宋绪佳1,张时君2,吕文鑫1,黄 林1,张 言1,吴明贵1,谢少伟2. 基于单壁碳纳米管的化学 - 光热协同治疗去势抵抗性前列腺癌的研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(4): 450-. |
[4] | 洪西 1,刘利杰 1,黄先玉 2,罗静 2,俞建军 1. 溴结构域蛋白 4抑制剂对前列腺癌细胞组蛋白巴豆酰化修饰 以及增殖、迁移的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(7): 721-. |
[5] | 谢少伟 1,董柏君 2,夏建国 1,王艳青 2,李红丽 1,张时君 1,杨文琪 1,李凤华 1. 前列腺前角穿刺活检在前列腺癌诊断中的价值[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(5): 518-. |
[6] | 方晓 1, 2,郭建功 1,黄金明 1,樊连城 2. 预后营养指数预测转移性去势抵抗前列腺癌患者阿比特龙初始耐药和预后[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(3): 316-. |
[7] | 陈鸣,傅晓红,吴墅,万永林. 前列腺特异抗原灰区患者前列腺癌的风险预估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(2): 217-. |
[8] | 王志威,王 杰,魏 敏,杨 莉,邵玉国,籍 敏,何 奇. 多西他赛、表柔比星联合环磷酰胺对局部晚期乳腺癌辅助化学治疗不同周期的疗效研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(12): 1432-. |
[9] | 陈艳,张晨. Pi3k/Akt信号通路与非典型抗精神病药物作用机制的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(8): 948-. |
[10] | 刘利杰 1,洪西 1,黄先玉 3,罗静 3,俞建军 1, 2. 前列腺癌中巴豆酰化修饰的测定及与肿瘤分期和分级的相关性[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(7): 788-. |
[11] | 潘玉龙1,齐隽2,周亮1,张彤彤1,李强1. 核糖体蛋白16高表达于前列腺癌并促进肿瘤进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(4): 394-. |
[12] | 姜燕,魏嵘,傅月珍. 盐酸纳美芬在小儿喉罩麻醉中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(2): 192-. |
[13] | 奚文崎,陆莉,蒋金玲,马韬,张俊 . 阿瑞匹坦在消化道肿瘤中预防中度致吐性化学治疗药物所致恶心 呕吐的临床观察#br#[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(8): 1132-. |
[14] | 潘家骅,迟辰斐,董柏君,朱寅杰,邵晓光,王艳青,徐凡,沙建军,黄翼然,薛蔚. 多西他赛联合全雄阻断新辅助疗法治疗高危局部进展性前列腺 癌的安全性[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(6): 797-. |
[15] | 樊连城 *,董柏君 *,迟辰斐,潘家骅,王艳青,邵晓光,徐凡,上官勋,周立新 #,薛蔚 # . 阿比特龙联合泼尼松治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的疗效及 预后因素分析#br#[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(11): 1483-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||