上海交通大学学报(医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 108-115.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2024.01.012
• 论著 · 临床研究 • 上一篇
李自云1(), 庄新娟1(), 季业1, 田海荣1, 殷峻2()
收稿日期:
2023-07-26
接受日期:
2023-10-25
出版日期:
2024-01-28
发布日期:
2024-02-28
通讯作者:
庄新娟,殷峻
E-mail:2558897955@qq.com;13918266832@163.com;yinjun@sjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:
李自云(1978—),男,副主任医师,硕士;电子信箱:2558897955@qq.com。
基金资助:
LI Ziyun1(), ZHUANG Xinjuan1(), JI Ye1, TIAN Hairong1, YIN Jun2()
Received:
2023-07-26
Accepted:
2023-10-25
Online:
2024-01-28
Published:
2024-02-28
Contact:
ZHUANG Xinjuan,YIN Jun
E-mail:2558897955@qq.com;13918266832@163.com;yinjun@sjtu.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
目的·探讨黄芪对甲状腺功能正常的桥本甲状腺炎患者T淋巴细胞亚群及细胞因子表达的影响。方法·选择2020年1月—12月在上海市第六人民医院金山分院接受治疗且资料完整的甲状腺功能正常的桥本甲状腺炎患者120例,采用随机数字表将患者为干预组及对照组,每组各60例。对照组治疗方案为碘适宜状态饮食,干预组在对照组治疗方案基础上联合黄芪药液口服(150 mL/次,2次/d)治疗。连续治疗6个月,比较2组治疗前后外周血清T淋巴细胞亚群(CD3+、CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+),细胞因子[包括白细胞介素2(interleukin-2,IL-2)、肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)、IL-6、IL-10],超敏C反应蛋白(hypersensitive C-reactive protein,hs-CRP),红细胞沉降率(erythrocyte sedimentation rate,ESR),以及甲状腺功能及自身抗体、肝肾功能等指标的变化。观察黄芪治疗期间不良反应。应用多因素线性回归分析甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体(thyroid peroxidase antibody,TPOAb)变化幅度的影响因素。结果·最终纳入118例患者,每组各59例。治疗6个月后,干预组CD4+ T细胞比例,CD4+/CD8+比值,IL-2、TNF-α、IL-6、IL-10、hs-CRP、ESR、TPOAb和甲状腺球蛋白抗体(thyroglobulin antibody,TGAb)水平均较治疗前及其同期对照组显著改善,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组治疗后上述指标与治疗前比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后干预组未见严重不良反应。多因素线性回归分析结果显示,应用黄芪、CD4+T细胞、CD4+/CD8+比值升高幅度及hs-CRP下降幅度均是TPOAb下降幅度的独立影响因素(β=-0.393,P=0.029;β=-0.513,P=0.010;β=-0.351,P=0.035;β=0.434,P=0.023)。结论·黄芪可改善甲状腺功能正常的桥本甲状腺炎患者CD4+T细胞、IL-2、TNF-α、IL-6、IL-10水平及CD4+/CD8+比值,且安全性佳。
中图分类号:
李自云, 庄新娟, 季业, 田海荣, 殷峻. 黄芪对甲状腺功能正常的桥本甲状腺炎患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群表达的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2024, 44(1): 108-115.
LI Ziyun, ZHUANG Xinjuan, JI Ye, TIAN Hairong, YIN Jun. Effects of Astragali Radix on T lymphocyte subsets expression in peripheral blood of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis patients with normal thyroid function[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2024, 44(1): 108-115.
Index | Before treatment (n=59) | After treatment (n=59) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention group | Control group | P value | Intervention group | Control group | P value | |
Male/female/n | 3/56 | 4/55 | 0.726 | |||
Age/year | 46±13 | 44±15 | 0.852 | |||
Duration of HT/month | 23 (7, 31) | 26 (8, 34) | 0.607 | 29 (13, 37) | 32 (14, 40) | 0.607 |
Smoke/[n(%)] | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Drink/[n(%)] | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
BMI/(kg·m-2) | 22.4±3.5 | 23.2±3.1 | 0.624 | 22.7±3.6 | 23.5±3.4 | 0.655 |
Scr/(μmol·L-1) | 61.2±15.4 | 59.1±16.1 | 0.682 | 60.4±14.8 | 60.7±17.5 | 0.832 |
eGFR/(mL·min-1·1.73-1·m-2) | 117.1±24.3 | 120.4±25.1 | 0.734 | 114.7±23.5 | 117.8±23.3 | 0.855 |
GPT/(U·L-1) | 24±12 | 23±10 | 0.567 | 23±11 | 24±10 | 0.786 |
AST/(U·L-1) | 21 (16, 31) | 23 (14, 29) | 0.301 | 20 (12, 28) | 24 (14, 43) | 0.243 |
γ-GT/(U·L-1) | 32.5 (17.5, 41.0) | 35.3 (18.1, 43.4) | 0.661 | 31.2 (15.7, 42.2) | 37.9 (19.0, 45.6) | 0.318 |
TC/(mmol·L-1) | 5.12±1.34 | 4.96±1.60 | 0.620 | 4.84±1.40 | 4.91±1.28 | 0.701 |
TAG/(U·L-1) | 2.56 (1.26, 4.07) | 2.69 (1.42, 3.93) | 0.734 | 2.47 (1.16, 4.22) | 2.78 (1.67, 4.33) | 0.796 |
MUI/(μg·L-1) | 145 (106, 187) | 149 (110, 190) | 0.864 | 128 (95, 171) | 135 (108, 178) | 0.764 |
Thyroid gland/cm3 | 25.53 (18.79, 28.35) | 24.35 (17.02, 26.23) | 0.805 | 23.47 (17.43, 26.18) | 23.05 (16.53, 25.62) | 0.909 |
表1 2组患者治疗前后基本资料的比较
Tab 1 Comparison of general information before and after treatment in the two groups
Index | Before treatment (n=59) | After treatment (n=59) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention group | Control group | P value | Intervention group | Control group | P value | |
Male/female/n | 3/56 | 4/55 | 0.726 | |||
Age/year | 46±13 | 44±15 | 0.852 | |||
Duration of HT/month | 23 (7, 31) | 26 (8, 34) | 0.607 | 29 (13, 37) | 32 (14, 40) | 0.607 |
Smoke/[n(%)] | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Drink/[n(%)] | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
BMI/(kg·m-2) | 22.4±3.5 | 23.2±3.1 | 0.624 | 22.7±3.6 | 23.5±3.4 | 0.655 |
Scr/(μmol·L-1) | 61.2±15.4 | 59.1±16.1 | 0.682 | 60.4±14.8 | 60.7±17.5 | 0.832 |
eGFR/(mL·min-1·1.73-1·m-2) | 117.1±24.3 | 120.4±25.1 | 0.734 | 114.7±23.5 | 117.8±23.3 | 0.855 |
GPT/(U·L-1) | 24±12 | 23±10 | 0.567 | 23±11 | 24±10 | 0.786 |
AST/(U·L-1) | 21 (16, 31) | 23 (14, 29) | 0.301 | 20 (12, 28) | 24 (14, 43) | 0.243 |
γ-GT/(U·L-1) | 32.5 (17.5, 41.0) | 35.3 (18.1, 43.4) | 0.661 | 31.2 (15.7, 42.2) | 37.9 (19.0, 45.6) | 0.318 |
TC/(mmol·L-1) | 5.12±1.34 | 4.96±1.60 | 0.620 | 4.84±1.40 | 4.91±1.28 | 0.701 |
TAG/(U·L-1) | 2.56 (1.26, 4.07) | 2.69 (1.42, 3.93) | 0.734 | 2.47 (1.16, 4.22) | 2.78 (1.67, 4.33) | 0.796 |
MUI/(μg·L-1) | 145 (106, 187) | 149 (110, 190) | 0.864 | 128 (95, 171) | 135 (108, 178) | 0.764 |
Thyroid gland/cm3 | 25.53 (18.79, 28.35) | 24.35 (17.02, 26.23) | 0.805 | 23.47 (17.43, 26.18) | 23.05 (16.53, 25.62) | 0.909 |
Index | Intervention group (n=59) | Control group (n=59) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
FT3/(pmol·L-1) | 4.26±0.46 | 4.28±0.43 | 4.19±0.41 | 4.09±0.35 |
FT4/(pmol·L-1) | 15.46±3.21 | 15.38±3.16 | 15.71±3.30 | 15.36±3.26 |
TSH/(pmol·L-1) | 2.35±0.43 | 2.43±0.39 | 2.41±0.46 | 2.52±0.41 |
TPOAb/(IU·mL-1) | 410.31±43.35 | 310.22±47.76①③ | 398.43±41.16 | 356.48±39.30 |
TGAb/(IU·mL-1) | 348.23±35.93 | 281.01±33.10②④ | 362.08±31.24 | 332.07±29.07 |
表2 2组患者治疗前后甲状腺功能及自身抗体水平比较(x±s)
Tab 2 Comparison of thyroid function and autoantibody levels between the two groups before and after treatment (x±s)
Index | Intervention group (n=59) | Control group (n=59) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
FT3/(pmol·L-1) | 4.26±0.46 | 4.28±0.43 | 4.19±0.41 | 4.09±0.35 |
FT4/(pmol·L-1) | 15.46±3.21 | 15.38±3.16 | 15.71±3.30 | 15.36±3.26 |
TSH/(pmol·L-1) | 2.35±0.43 | 2.43±0.39 | 2.41±0.46 | 2.52±0.41 |
TPOAb/(IU·mL-1) | 410.31±43.35 | 310.22±47.76①③ | 398.43±41.16 | 356.48±39.30 |
TGAb/(IU·mL-1) | 348.23±35.93 | 281.01±33.10②④ | 362.08±31.24 | 332.07±29.07 |
Index | Intervention group (n=59) | Control group (n=59) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
CD3+/% | 59.23±4.12 | 68.14±4.52 | 57.15±5.38 | 60.45±5.70 |
CD4+/% | 34.36±5.54 | 44.56±4.26①⑤ | 32.17±5.16 | 34.11±5.06 |
CD8+/% | 22.20±4.23 | 21.12±4.01 | 22.48±3.35 | 22.15±2.26 |
CD4+/CD8+ | 1.55 (1.10, 2.03) | 2.11 (1.63, 2.82)①⑤ | 1.43 (1.13, 1.92) | 1.54 (1.21, 1.91) |
IL-2/(pg·mL-1) | 4.27 (2.23, 9.27) | 2.99 (2.01, 6.48)②⑥ | 4.20 (2.00, 8.99) | 4.13 (2.01, 8.78) |
TNF-α/(pg·mL-1) | 8.92 (3.59, 17.47) | 7.71 (3.25, 15.42)③⑥ | 8.71 (4.05, 17.69) | 8.59 (3.32, 17.43) |
IL-6/(pg·mL-1) | 3.74 (1.05, 7.99) | 5.04 (2.25, 11.45)④⑦ | 3.45 (1.34, 8.11) | 3.50 (1.15, 8.03) |
IL-10/(pg·mL-1) | 7.08 (3.05, 17.14) | 8.71 (4.11, 18.09)②⑧ | 7.17 (3.43, 17.01) | 7.03 (3.21, 16.31) |
hs-CRP/(mg·L-1) | 6.46 (1.55, 8.78) | 3.27 (0.76, 5.16)①⑤ | 6.76 (1.78, 9.68) | 6.37 (1.97, 9.77) |
ESR//(mg·L-1) | 15.5 (8.4, 23.0) | 12.6 (8.3, 19.5)④⑨ | 14.9 (8.9, 22.6) | 14.1 (9.1, 21.4) |
表3 2组患者T淋巴细胞亚群及炎症因子治疗前后比较
Tab 3 Comparison of T lymphocyte subsets and cellular inflammatory factors before and after treatment in the two groups
Index | Intervention group (n=59) | Control group (n=59) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
CD3+/% | 59.23±4.12 | 68.14±4.52 | 57.15±5.38 | 60.45±5.70 |
CD4+/% | 34.36±5.54 | 44.56±4.26①⑤ | 32.17±5.16 | 34.11±5.06 |
CD8+/% | 22.20±4.23 | 21.12±4.01 | 22.48±3.35 | 22.15±2.26 |
CD4+/CD8+ | 1.55 (1.10, 2.03) | 2.11 (1.63, 2.82)①⑤ | 1.43 (1.13, 1.92) | 1.54 (1.21, 1.91) |
IL-2/(pg·mL-1) | 4.27 (2.23, 9.27) | 2.99 (2.01, 6.48)②⑥ | 4.20 (2.00, 8.99) | 4.13 (2.01, 8.78) |
TNF-α/(pg·mL-1) | 8.92 (3.59, 17.47) | 7.71 (3.25, 15.42)③⑥ | 8.71 (4.05, 17.69) | 8.59 (3.32, 17.43) |
IL-6/(pg·mL-1) | 3.74 (1.05, 7.99) | 5.04 (2.25, 11.45)④⑦ | 3.45 (1.34, 8.11) | 3.50 (1.15, 8.03) |
IL-10/(pg·mL-1) | 7.08 (3.05, 17.14) | 8.71 (4.11, 18.09)②⑧ | 7.17 (3.43, 17.01) | 7.03 (3.21, 16.31) |
hs-CRP/(mg·L-1) | 6.46 (1.55, 8.78) | 3.27 (0.76, 5.16)①⑤ | 6.76 (1.78, 9.68) | 6.37 (1.97, 9.77) |
ESR//(mg·L-1) | 15.5 (8.4, 23.0) | 12.6 (8.3, 19.5)④⑨ | 14.9 (8.9, 22.6) | 14.1 (9.1, 21.4) |
Index | Intervention group (n=59) | Control group (n=59) |
---|---|---|
CD3+T cells increase/% | 8.65 (3.42, 15.20)① | 2.83 (1.14, 5.23) |
CD4+T cells increase/% | 9.05 (4.20, 16.81)① | 1.95 (-0.43, 5.96) |
CD8+T cells decrease/% | 0.69 (-0.21, 1.75)② | 0.35 (-0.79, 1.42) |
CD4+/CD8+ increase | 0.55 (-0.20, 1.41)① | 0.11 (-0.30, 0.37) |
TPOAb decrease/(IU·mL-1) | 97.12 (42.35, 170.58)① | 38.91 (19.33, 80.14) |
TGAb decrease/(IU·mL-1) | 64.17 (33.77, 130.10)① | 26.54 (11.74, 68.09) |
hs-CRP decrease/(mg·L-1) | 2.81 (0.75, 3.29)① | 0.38 (-0.21, 0.73) |
ESR decrease/(mg·L-1) | 2.5 (0.1, 3.3)① | 0.8 (-0.3, 1.3) |
表4 2组患者T淋巴细胞亚群、TPOAb、TGAb、hs-CRP、ESR治疗前后变化幅度比较
Tab 4 Comparison of changes in T lymphocyte subsets, TPOAb, TGAb, hs-CRP and ESR before and after treatment between the two groups
Index | Intervention group (n=59) | Control group (n=59) |
---|---|---|
CD3+T cells increase/% | 8.65 (3.42, 15.20)① | 2.83 (1.14, 5.23) |
CD4+T cells increase/% | 9.05 (4.20, 16.81)① | 1.95 (-0.43, 5.96) |
CD8+T cells decrease/% | 0.69 (-0.21, 1.75)② | 0.35 (-0.79, 1.42) |
CD4+/CD8+ increase | 0.55 (-0.20, 1.41)① | 0.11 (-0.30, 0.37) |
TPOAb decrease/(IU·mL-1) | 97.12 (42.35, 170.58)① | 38.91 (19.33, 80.14) |
TGAb decrease/(IU·mL-1) | 64.17 (33.77, 130.10)① | 26.54 (11.74, 68.09) |
hs-CRP decrease/(mg·L-1) | 2.81 (0.75, 3.29)① | 0.38 (-0.21, 0.73) |
ESR decrease/(mg·L-1) | 2.5 (0.1, 3.3)① | 0.8 (-0.3, 1.3) |
Variable | β | SE | Standard | t value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD4+T cells increase | -0.513 | 0.231 | -0.407 | -2.709 | 0.010 |
hs-CRP decrease | 0.434 | 0.201 | 0.365 | 2.351 | 0.023 |
Astragali Radix | -0.393 | 0.178 | -0.321 | -2.209 | 0.029 |
CD4+/CD8+ increase | -0.351 | 0.133 | -0.300 | -2.010 | 0.035 |
表5 TPOAb变化幅度影响因素的多因素线性回归分析
Tab 5 Multiple linear regression analysis of the factors affecting the magnitude of TPOAb change
Variable | β | SE | Standard | t value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD4+T cells increase | -0.513 | 0.231 | -0.407 | -2.709 | 0.010 |
hs-CRP decrease | 0.434 | 0.201 | 0.365 | 2.351 | 0.023 |
Astragali Radix | -0.393 | 0.178 | -0.321 | -2.209 | 0.029 |
CD4+/CD8+ increase | -0.351 | 0.133 | -0.300 | -2.010 | 0.035 |
1 | SAFARIAN G K, GZGZYAN A M, DZHEMLIKHANOVA LYAILYA K, et al. Does subclinical hypothyroidism and/or thyroid autoimmunity influence the IVF/ICSI outcome? Review of the literature[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2019, 35(sup1): 56-59. |
2 | DERAKHSHAN A, KOREVAAR T I M, TAYLOR P N, et al. The association of maternal thyroid autoimmunity during pregnancy with child IQ[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2018, 103(10): 3729-3736. |
3 | 李建婷, 张海清, 李明龙. 桥本甲状腺炎免疫相关机制的研究进展[J]. 细胞与分子免疫学杂志, 2014, 30(7): 771-773. |
LI J T, ZHANG H Q, LI M L. Advances in immune-related mechanisms of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, 2014, 30(7): 771-773. | |
4 | LI Q, WANG B, MU K, et al. The pathogenesis of thyroid autoimmune diseases: new T lymphocytes-cytokines circuits beyond the Th1-Th2 paradigm [J]. J Cell Physiol, 2019, 234(3): 2204-2216. |
5 | 刘晓炜, 高天舒. 黄芪治疗桥本甲状腺炎配伍规律及作用机制研究[J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报, 2022, 10: 103-109. |
LIU X W, GAO T S. Prescription rules and mechanism analysis of Astragalus in the treatment of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2022, 10: 103-109. | |
6 | 许嘉慧, 陈清光, 章丽琼, 等. 基于网络药理学和分子对接法探讨黄芪治疗桥本甲状腺炎的机制[J]. 上海中医药杂志, 2021, 55(4): 6-14. |
XU J H, CHEN Q G, ZHANG L Q, et al. Mechanism analysis of Astragali Radix in treatment of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis based on network pharmacology and Molecular Docking Method [J]. Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2021, 55(4): 6-14. | |
7 | 章丽琼, 陆灏, 徐佩英. 黄芪胶囊对桥本氏甲状腺炎患者自身免疫性抗体的影响[J]. 世界中医药, 2016, 11(7): 1279-1281, 1285. |
ZHANG L Q, LU H, XU P Y. Effect of Huangqi capsule on the level of autoimmune antibodies in patients with Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2016, 11(7):1279-1281, 1285. | |
8 | 中华医学会内分泌学分会《中国甲状腺疾病诊治指南》编写组. 中国甲状腺疾病诊治指南: 甲状腺炎[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2008, 47(9):784-788. |
Writing group of Chinese Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Thyroid Diseases, Chinese Society of Endocrinology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid diseases: thyroiditis [J]. Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine, 2008, 47(9): 784-788. | |
9 | 中华医学会地方病分会, 中国营养学会, 中华医学会内分泌学分会. 中国居民补碘指南[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018. |
Chinese Society of Local Epidemiology, Chinese Nutrition Society, Chinese Society of Endocrinology. Guidelines for iodine supplementation for Chinese residents [M].Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2018. | |
10 | SUBHI O, SCHULTEN H J, BAGATIAN N, et al. Genetic relationship between Hashimoto′s thyroiditis and papillary thyroid carcinoma with coexisting Hashimoto′s thyroiditis[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(6): e0234566. |
11 | 李心爱, 李哲, 商建伟, 等. 中西医结合治疗桥本甲状腺炎疗效的meta分析[J]. 中国医药科学, 2022, 12(6): 27-31, 56. |
LI X A, LI Z, SHANG J W, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Journal of Chinese Medical Sciences, 2012,12(6): 27-31, 56. | |
12 | 刘婧茹, 王清. 夏枯草胶囊对桥本甲状腺炎患者自身抗体及Th17细胞的影响[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2012, 32(24): 5413-5415. |
LIU J R, WANG Q. Effect of Xiakucao capsule on autoantibodies and Th17 cells in patients with Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 2012, 32(24): 5413-5415. | |
13 | 曹拥军, 蒋晟昰, 陈亚琴, 等. 穿山龙对桥本甲状腺炎患者Th1/Th2型细胞因子表达的影响[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2016, 31(3): 1103-1105. |
CAO Y J, JIANG S S, CHEN Y Q, et al. Effect of pangolin on the expression of Th1/Th2 type cytokines in patients with Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, 2016, 31(3):1103-1105. | |
14 | 胡妮娜, 张晓娟. 黄芪的化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中医药信息, 2021, 38(1): 76-82. |
HU N N, ZHANG X J. Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Astragalus membranaceus [J]. Chinese Medicine Information, 2021, 38(1): 76-82. | |
15 | 姜辉, 顾胜龙, 张玉婷, 等. 黄芪化学成分和药理作用研究进展[J]. 安徽中医药大学学报, 2020, 39(5): 93-96. |
JIANG H, GU S L, ZHANG Y T, et al. Advances in chemical components and pharmacological effects of Astragalus membranaceus [J].Journal of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020, 39(5): 93-96. | |
16 | 郑慧娟, 魏璠, 柏力萄, 等. 基于中医传承辅助系统治疗桥本甲状腺炎的组方规律[J]. 世界中医药, 2018, 13(9): 2346-2351. |
ZHENG H J, WEI F, BAI L L, et al. Prescription rules of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis treatment based on traditional Chinese medicine inheritance auxiliary system [J]. World Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2018, 13(9): 2346-2351. | |
17 | 周美云, 李双双. 桥本氏甲状腺炎发病中CD4+T细胞的研究进展[J]. 南通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(4): 365-368. |
ZHOU M Y, LI S S. Research progress of CD4+T cells in the pathogenesis of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Journal of Nantong University (Medical Edition), 2020, 40(4): 365-368. | |
18 | RALLI M, ANGELETTI D, FIORE M, et al. Hashimoto′s thyroiditis: an update on pathogenic mechanisms, diagnostic protocols, therapeutic strategies, and potential malignant transformation[J]. Autoimmun Rev, 2020, 19(10): 102649. |
19 | 杨敏, 张瑞, 吴跃跃, 等. 桥本甲状腺炎患者内脏脂肪M1型巨噬细胞与胰岛素抵抗的相关分析[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2022, 39(6): 413-414. |
YANG M, ZHANG R, WU Y Y, et al. Correlation analysis of M1 macrophages in visceral adipose tissue and insulin resistance in patients with Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine, 2022, 39(6): 413-414. | |
20 | 杨凤华, 康成, 李淑华, 等. 黄芪水溶性黄酮类对小鼠细胞免疫功能的影响[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2002, 13(12): 718-719. |
YANG F H, KANG C, LI S H, et al. The effect of Astragalus flavonoids on cellular immunity in mice [J]. Shizhen Chinese Medicine and Chinese Medicine, 2002, 13(12): 718-719. | |
21 | 刘慧, 赵俊云, 杨向竹, 等. 黄芪糖蛋白对胶原诱导性关节炎小鼠Th17/Treg细胞免疫平衡的影响[J]. 环球中医药, 2016, 9(12): 1454-1458. |
LIU H, ZHAO J Y, YANG X Z, et al. Influences of AmGP on Th17 / Treg immune balance in CIA mice [J]. Global Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2016, 9(12): 1454-1458. | |
22 | ZHOU X, SUN X, GONG X, et al. Astragaloside IV from Astragalus membranaceus ameliorates renal interstitial fibrosis by inhibiting inflammation via TLR4/NF-кB in vivo and in vitro[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2017, 42: 18-24. |
23 | SILVESTRINI A, MORDENTE A, MARTINO G, et al. The role of selenium in oxidative stress and in nonthyroidal illness syndrome (NTIS): an overview[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2020, 27(3): 423-449. |
24 | 景洁, 权金星, 姜盼盼. 硒在自身免疫性甲状腺病中作用机制的研究现状[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2022, 23(3): 236-240. |
JING J, QUAN J X, JIANG P P. Research status of the mechanism of selenium in autoimmune thyroid diseases [J]. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2022, 23(3): 236-240. | |
25 | 万会娜, 张国玉, 万红, 等. 营养因素对桥本甲状腺炎患者甲状腺自身抗体滴度的影响[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(17): 2152-2158. |
WAN H N, ZHANG G Y, WAN H, et al. Association of nutritional factors with thyroid autoantibody titer in Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 25(17): 2152-2158. | |
26 | 李自云, 刘波, 季业, 等. 2型糖尿病患者血尿酸水平与超敏C反应蛋白的关系[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(28): 2181-2185. |
LI Z Y, LIU B, JI Y, et al. Association between serum uric acid level and high sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2017, 97(28): 2181-2185. | |
27 | 周绍荣, 刘晓鸫, 张磊, 等. 消瘿合剂治疗桥本甲状腺炎临床研究[J]. 山东中医杂志, 2020, 2: 153-156. |
ZHOU S R, LIU X T, ZHANG L, et al. Clinical study on Xiaoying Mixture in treatment of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis [J]. Shandong Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020, 2: 153-156. | |
28 | 陈威妮, 段素静, 张婷, 等. 补气化痰方对桥本甲状腺炎临床疗效及调节性T细胞的影响[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2021, 37(2): 100-103. |
CHEN W N, DUAN S J, ZHANG T, et al. Clinical effects of Buqihuatan Decoction on Hashimoto thyroiditis and regulatory T cells [J]. Journal of Baotou Medical College, 2021, 37(2): 100-103. | |
29 | 陈晓雯, 范淑允, 李玲, 等. 芪夏消瘿合剂治疗桥本甲状腺炎临床研究[J]. 中医学报, 2013, 28(4): 573-576. |
CHEN X W, FAN S Y, LI L, et al. Clinical effects of Buqihuatan Decoction on Hashimoto thyroiditis and regulatory T cells [J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2013, 28(4): 573-576. | |
30 | 李晓玲, 王存丰, 翟亚萍, 等. 桥本甲状腺炎和格雷夫斯病甲状腺组织中淋巴细胞亚群分布及临床意义[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2013, 27(12): 1156-1158. |
LI X L, WANG C F, ZHAI Y P, et al. Distribution and clinical significance of lymphocyte subsets in thyroid tissue of Hashimoto′s thyroiditis and Graves′ disease [J]. Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy, 2013, 27(12): 1156-1158. |
[1] | 谢欣宜, 周薇, 邱澈, 沈慧, 宋忠臣. 伴阿尔茨海默病牙周炎患者血清Th17/Treg相关细胞因子水平变化研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(5): 600-605. |
[2] | 徐瀛濂, 田静, 张翔, 赵顺英. 气道上皮细胞在哮喘发病机制中的作用研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(5): 619-623. |
[3] | 吴瑞芳, 冯明, 孟健. 脂肪酸结合蛋白4在肥胖相关肿瘤中的作用综述[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(10): 1311-1316. |
[4] | 卫晓薇, 田福举, 刘晓瑞, 曾维宏, 陈彩莲, 林羿. 敲减TCF3抑制人子宫内膜基质细胞蜕膜化的研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(9): 1247-1257. |
[5] | 李昕雨, 左斌, 王文, 钮晓音, 翁震, 何杨. 脂联素在免疫性血小板减少症患者外周血中的水平及其对巨核细胞系分化的作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(7): 866-874. |
[6] | 雷海桃, 田雪梅, 金芳全. 细胞因子信号转导抑制因子与类风湿关节炎的相关性研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(7): 945-951. |
[7] | 董玉山, 张文杰. 细胞因子治疗骨关节炎的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(11): 1627-1632. |
[8] | 陈锐, 赵云, 赵晓霞, 马东, 韩一江, 赖登明, 顾伟忠, 钭金法. 沉默信息调节因子1在新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎肠组织中的表达特点[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(9): 1154-1161. |
[9] | 戴 飞,魏瑾瑾,汤欣玥,陈 峥,蔺 林. 舌下含服免疫治疗对效应性T细胞和调节性T细胞功能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(5): 626-632. |
[10] | 高 涵,张 萍. 子宫内膜异位症的免疫学相关研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(11): 1544-1549. |
[11] | 赵乙汜1,余应喜1,林时辉2,徐 昉1, 2. T细胞免疫在脓毒症继发侵袭性真菌感染中作用的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(11): 1325-. |
[12] | 刘阳春,叶海峰,李小燕,胡川,黄健,郑月慧. 卵巢生殖干细胞巢功能的影响因素和调控机制[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(6): 708-. |
[13] | 李文 1,谈珍 2,刘成博 1,王铮涛 3,张拥军 1. 黄芪多糖APS- Ⅱ- 2对脂多糖所致绒毛膜羊膜炎诱发的肺泡化阻滞的改善作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(4): 374-. |
[14] | 邢梦娟,彭代辉. NLRP3 炎症小体在抑郁症发病机制中的作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(2): 217-. |
[15] | 方新宇,张晨. 白介素 17 与精神分裂症的相关性研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2017, 37(9): 1266-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||