上海交通大学学报（医学版）

›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1047-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2011.07.039

• 短篇论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

牙周治疗对龈下菌斑中古细菌定植的影响

李超伦, 刘大力, 钱洁蕾, 周彦玢, 束 蓉   

  1. 上海交通大学 医学院附属第九人民医院牙周科 上海市口腔医学重点实验室, 上海 200011
  • 出版日期:2011-07-28 发布日期:2011-07-27
  • 作者简介:李超伦（1972—）, 男, 主治医师, 博士；电子信箱: lichaolun@21cn.com。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金（30700945）和上海市重点学科建设项目（S30206）

Effects of periodontal therapy on Archaea colonization in subgingival plaque

LI Chao-lun, LIU Da-li, QIAN Jie-lei, ZHOU Yan-bin, SHU Rong   

  1. Department of Periodontics, the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Online:2011-07-28 Published:2011-07-27
  • Supported by:

    National Natural Science Foundation of China, 30700945；Shanghai Key Discipline Construction Project, S30206

PDF (PC)

1794

摘要：

目的 研究牙周治疗对龈下菌斑中古细菌定植的影响。方法 对49例中重度牙周炎患者的牙周治疗进程进行跟踪，分别于龈上菌斑刮除后（基线）、牙周基础治疗后4周和牙周翻瓣术后12周，采集龈下菌斑标本抽提DNA，利用古细菌16S rRNA基因通用引物进行PCR，对各菌斑标本古细菌16S rRNA表达进行定性检测，确定阳性标本并计算古细菌检出率。采用Real-Time PCR技术对阳性标本中总细菌和古细菌16S rRNA基因进行定量检测，计算古细菌相对丰度。结果 牙周翻瓣术后12周时龈下菌斑标本中的古细菌检出率和古细菌相对丰度分别为17.6%和0.58%，显著低于基线时的69.4%和2.32%及牙周基础治疗后4周时的57.1%和2.30%，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 龈下菌斑中古细菌的定植情况伴随牙周治疗的进程而迅速降低，提示菌斑厌氧环境的改变是影响古细菌定植的关键因素。

关键词: 牙周炎, 古细菌, 定植, 龈下菌斑

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of periodontal therapy on Archaea colonization in subgingival plaque. Methods The periodontal treatment process of 49 patients with moderate to severe periodontitis were followed up, and subgingival plaque samples were collected after supragingival plaque scaling (baseline), 4 weeks after periodontal basic treatment and 12 weeks after periodontal flap surgery for DNA extraction. PCR was performed with 16S rRNA gene of Archaea, and the expression of 16S rRNA of Archaea in plaque samples was qualitatively detected. The positive samples were determined, and the detection rate of Archaea was calculated. Real-Time PCR was employed to quantitatively detect the 16S rRNA gene of total bacteria and Archaea in positive samples, and the relative abundance of Archaea was calculated. Results The detection rates of Archaea and relative abundance of Archaea in subgingival plaque samples 12 weeks after periodontal flap surgery were 17.6% and 0.58% respectively, which were significantly lower than those at baseline (69.4% and 2.32%) and 4 weeks after periodontal basic treatment (57.1% and 2.30%)（P<0.05）. Conclusion The Archaea colonization in subgingival plaque rapidly decreases with the periodontal treatment process, which indicates that the subgingival anaerobic environment is the key factor for Archaea colonization.

Key words: periodontitis, Archaea, colonization, subgingival plaque