上海交通大学学报（医学版）

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1188-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2019.10.015

• 论著·公共卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

青春期儿童生活质量量表在留守儿童中的应用考评

刁 华，王 宏，杨连建，李 婷，金 凤，蒲 杨   

  1. 重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院，医学与社会研究中心，健康领域社会风险预测治理协同创新中心，重庆 400016
  • 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-11-22
  • 通讯作者: 王 宏，电子信箱：wangh111111@aliyun.com。
  • 作者简介:刁 华（1994—），男，硕士生；电子信箱：diaohwlkq@aliyun.com。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金（17YJA840015）

Evaluation of Adolescents Quality of Life Scale on reliability and validity in left-behind children

DIAO Hua, WANG Hong, YANG Lian-jian, LI Ting, JIN Feng, PU Yang   

  1. School of Public Health and Management, Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Innovation Center for Social Risk Governance in Health, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-11-22
  • Supported by:
    Humanities and Social Sciences Research Planning Fund Ministry of Education, 17YJA840015

PDF (PC)

343

摘要： 目的·评价青春期儿童生活质量量表在留守儿童中的信效度，为留守儿童生活质量的研究提供可靠的测量工具。方法·采用目的抽样的方法，在重庆市綦江区抽取6所学校（中小学校各3所），共抽取4～9年级调查对象1 276名。1周后，抽取中小学校各1所进行重测。结果·青春期儿童生活质量量表删除第23个条目，38个条目的因子载荷均大于0.4，累计方差贡献率为61.713%，共得到4维度11因子。验证性因子分析得生理、心理、社会、青春期维度与总量表的χ2/df均小于5，拟合优度指数（GFI）、增量拟合指数（IFI）和比较拟合指数（CFI）均大于0.9；各维度的近似误差均方根（RMSEA）均小于0.08，总量表的RMSEA为0.083；生理维度和青春期维度规范拟合指数（NFI）均大于0.9，心理、社会维度和总量表的NFI分别为0.883、0.876和0.871。信度分析得各维度及总量表的α系数和重测信度分别为0.648～0.849和0.554～0.831。结论·修订后的青春期儿童生活质量量表具有良好的信效度，可作为我国留守儿童生活质量的测量工具。

关键词: 留守儿童, 生活质量, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective · To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Adolescents Quality of Life Scale in left-behind children to provide a reliable measurement tool for the study of the quality of life of left-behind children. Methods · Six schools (three primary schools and three secondary schools) were selected in the Qianjiang District of Chongqing Citythe purpose sampling method. A total of 1 276 students in the 4-9 grades were selected. One week later, one of the primary and secondary schools was retested respectively. Results · The 23rd item was deleted the Adolescents Quality of Life Scale. Every factor load of 38 items was greater than 0.4, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 61.713%. A total of 4 dimensions and 11 factors were obtained. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that, for physical, psychological, social, and pubertal dimensions and total scale, χ2/df values were less than 5, and goodness of fit index (GFI), incremental fit index (IFI) and comparative fit index (CFI) values were greater than 0.9; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) value of each dimension was less than 0.08, and RMSEA value of total scale was 0.083; normed fit index (NFI) values of physical and pubertal dimensions were greater than 0.9, and NFI values for the psychological and social dimensions and total scale were 0.883, 0.876, and 0.871, respectively. The coefficient and the test-retest reliability of each dimension and the total scale were 0.648-0.849 and 0.554-0.831, respectively. Conclusion · The revised Adolescent Childrens Quality of Life Scale has good reliability and validity, suggesting that it can be used for assessing the quality of life of left-behind children in China.

Key words: left-behind children, quality of life, reliability, validity

中图分类号: