巨噬细胞介导心肌纤维化的分子机制及靶向干预研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2026.03.009

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 348-357.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2026.03.009

• 综述 • 上一篇

巨噬细胞介导心肌纤维化的分子机制及靶向干预研究进展

钱亦乐¹^,², 姚赛¹^,², 陈思锋², 李全富³, 赵猛¹^,²()

^1.复旦大学基础医学院前沿创新中心，上海 200032
^2.复旦大学基础医学院生理与病理生理学系，上海 200032
^3.同济大学附属上海市肺科医院麻醉科，上海 200433

收稿日期:2025-08-06 接受日期:2025-11-27 出版日期:2026-03-28 发布日期:2026-03-30
通讯作者: 赵　猛，青年研究员，博士；电子信箱：zhaomeng@fudan.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2024ZD0526504);国家自然科学基金(82170238)

Research progress on the molecular mechanisms and targeted interventions of macrophage-mediated myocardial fibrosis

Qian Yile¹^,², Yao Sai¹^,², Chen Sifeng², Li Quanfu³, Zhao Meng¹^,²()

^1.Frontier Innovation Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
^2.Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
^3.Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2025-08-06 Accepted:2025-11-27 Online:2026-03-28 Published:2026-03-30
Contact: Zhao Meng, E-mail: zhaomeng@fudan.edu.cn.
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China(2024ZD0526504);National Natural Science Foundation of China(82170238)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

心肌纤维化是多种心血管疾病发展的关键病理基础，其特征是成纤维细胞活化为肌成纤维细胞并大量合成胶原蛋白，导致细胞外基质异常积聚，进而损害心脏结构与功能。巨噬细胞作为心血管系统中的关键免疫细胞，其功能受到细胞来源和微环境变化的双重调控。不同表型的巨噬细胞在心肌损伤过程中发挥不同作用。促炎型巨噬细胞在早期介导炎症反应，而促修复型巨噬细胞则通过旁分泌因子促进成纤维细胞活化和胶原沉积。近年来，单细胞转录组与空间转录组等高通量技术的发展，以更高分辨率揭示了心脏巨噬细胞的异质性、动态变化及其与其他细胞的通信网络。传统治疗方法对心肌纤维化的疗效有限，而纳米颗粒递送系统或工程化细胞疗法等精准手段，可实现对心脏巨噬细胞的特异性重编程。该文总结心脏巨噬细胞的异质性，重点讨论在病理状态下巨噬细胞调控心肌纤维化的分子机制及其治疗潜力，旨在为精准调控巨噬细胞功能、开发心肌纤维化新疗法提供理论参考。

关键词: 巨噬细胞, 心肌纤维化, 靶向治疗

Abstract:

Myocardial fibrosis is a critical pathological basis underlying the progression of various cardiovascular diseases. It is characterized by the activation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and excessive synthesis of collagen, leading to abnormal accumulation of the extracellular matrix, which ultimately impairs cardiac structure and function. Cardiac macrophages, as key immune cells in the cardiovascular system, exhibit diverse functions that are regulated by their origin and local microenvironment. Distinct macrophage phenotypes play different roles during myocardial injury. Pro-inflammatory macrophages mediate the early inflammatory response, whereas pro-reparative macrophages promote fibroblast activation and collagen deposition via paracrine signaling. Recent advances in high-throughput techniques, such as single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, have provided unprecedented resolution for understanding the heterogeneity, dynamic changes, and intercellular communication networks of cardiac macrophages. Conventional therapies have limited capacity in reversing established fibrosis, but emerging approaches such as nanoparticle-based delivery systems and engineered cell therapies hold promise for the precise reprogramming of cardiac macrophages. This review summarizes the heterogeneity of cardiac macrophages, highlights the molecular mechanisms by which they regulate myocardial fibrosis under pathological conditions, and discusses the therapeutic potential of macrophage-targeted strategies, aiming to provide theoretical guidance for precise modulation of macrophage function and the development of novel anti-fibrotic interventions.

Key words: macrophage, myocardial fibrosis, targeted therapy

中图分类号:

R363.2

钱亦乐, 姚赛, 陈思锋, 李全富, 赵猛. 巨噬细胞介导心肌纤维化的分子机制及靶向干预研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 46(3): 348-357.

Qian Yile, Yao Sai, Chen Sifeng, Li Quanfu, Zhao Meng. Research progress on the molecular mechanisms and targeted interventions of macrophage-mediated myocardial fibrosis[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2026, 46(3): 348-357.

参考文献 91

[1]	Kanisicak O, Khalil H, Ivey M J, et al. Genetic lineage tracing defines myofibroblast origin and function in the injured heart[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12260.
[2]	Zhang S H, Li Y, Huang X Z, et al. Seamless genetic recording of transiently activated mesenchymal gene expression in endothelial cells during cardiac fibrosis[J]. Circulation, 2021, 144(25): 2004-2020.
[3]	Liu K, Jin H W, Tang M X, et al. Lineage tracing clarifies the cellular origin of tissue-resident macrophages in the developing heart[J]. J Cell Biol, 2022, 221(6): e202108093.
[4]	Bajpai G, Bredemeyer A, Li W J, et al. Tissue resident CCR2- and CCR2+ cardiac macrophages differentially orchestrate monocyte recruitment and fate specification following myocardial injury[J]. Circ Res, 2019, 124(2): 263-278.
[5]	Bajpai G, Schneider C, Wong N, et al. The human heart contains distinct macrophage subsets with divergent origins and functions[J]. Nat Med, 2018, 24(8): 1234-1245.
[6]	Dick S A, Wong A, Hamidzada H, et al. Three tissue resident macrophage subsets coexist across organs with conserved origins and life cycles[J]. Sci Immunol, 2022, 7(67): eabf7777.
[7]	Rizzo G, Gropper J, Piollet M, et al. Dynamics of monocyte-derived macrophage diversity in experimental myocardial infarction[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2023, 119(3): 772-785.
[8]	Grune J, Lewis A J M, Yamazoe M, et al. Neutrophils incite and macrophages avert electrical storm after myocardial infarction[J]. Nat Cardiovasc Res, 2022, 1(7): 649-664.
[9]	Gong S Y, Zhai M, Shi J Y, et al. TREM2 macrophage promotes cardiac repair in myocardial infarction by reprogramming metabolism via SLC25A53[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2024, 31(2): 239-253.
[10]	Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, et al. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization[J]. Trends Immunol, 2004, 25(12): 677-686.
[11]	Wang Y, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. Hypoxia induces M2 macrophages to express VSIG4 and mediate cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction[J]. Theranostics, 2023, 13(7): 2192-2209.
[12]	Wang Y, Li C F, Zhao R Z, et al. CircUbe3a from M2 macrophage-derived small extracellular vesicles mediates myocardial fibrosis after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Theranostics, 2021, 11(13): 6315-6333.
[13]	Wu Y R, Zhan S Y, Chen L, et al. TNFSF14/LIGHT promotes cardiac fibrosis and atrial fibrillation vulnerability via PI3Kγ/SGK1 pathway-dependent M2 macrophage polarisation[J]. J Transl Med, 2023, 21(1): 544.
[14]	Guo W L, Yang C, Zou J W, et al. Interleukin-1β polarization in M1 macrophage mediates myocardial fibrosis in diabetes[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2024, 131: 111858.
[15]	Ramanujam D, Schön A P, Beck C, et al. microRNA-21-dependent macrophage-to-fibroblast signaling determines the cardiac response to pressure overload[J]. Circulation, 2021, 143(15): 1513-1525.
[16]	Dick S A, Macklin J A, Nejat S, et al. Self-renewing resident cardiac macrophages limit adverse remodeling following myocardial infarction[J]. Nat Immunol, 2019, 20(1): 29-39.
[17]	Revelo X S, Parthiban P, Chen C, et al. Cardiac resident macrophages prevent fibrosis and stimulate angiogenesis[J]. Circ Res, 2021, 129(12): 1086-1101.
[18]	Jin K Y, Gao S, Yang P H, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the temporal diversity and dynamics of cardiac immunity after myocardial infarction[J]. Small Methods, 2022, 6(3): e2100752.
[19]	Ren Z N, Yu P, Li D D, et al. Single-cell reconstruction of progression trajectory reveals intervention principles in pathological cardiac hypertrophy[J]. Circulation, 2020, 141(21): 1704-1719.
[20]	Amrute J M, Luo X, Penna V, et al. Targeting immune-fibroblast cell communication in heart failure[J]. Nature, 2024, 635(8038): 423-433.
[21]	Frangogiannis N G. The extracellular matrix in ischemic and nonischemic heart failure[J]. Circ Res, 2019, 125(1): 117-146.
[22]	Govindappa P K, Patil M, Garikipati V N S, et al. Targeting exosome-associated human antigen R attenuates fibrosis and inflammation in diabetic heart[J]. FASEB J, 2020, 34(2): 2238-2251.
[23]	Parthiban P, Barrow F, Wang H G, et al. Macrophage-derived CCL24 promotes cardiac fibrosis via fibroblast CCR3[J]. Circ Res, 2025, 137(9): 1140-1156.
[24]	Bossa A S, Salemi V M, Ribeiro S P, et al. Plasma cytokine profile in tropical endomyocardial fibrosis: predominance of TNF-α, IL-4 and IL-10[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e108984.
[25]	Tian Y, Wang Y B, Chen W J, et al. Role of serum TGF-β1 level in atrial fibrosis and outcome after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(51): e9210.
[26]	Kayvanpour E, Sedaghat-Hamedani F, Li D T, et al. Prognostic value of circulating fibrosis biomarkers in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM): insights into clinical outcomes[J]. Biomolecules, 2024, 14(9): 1137.
[27]	Alexanian M, Padmanabhan A, Nishino T, et al. Chromatin remodelling drives immune cell-fibroblast communication in heart failure[J]. Nature, 2024, 635(8038): 434-443.
[28]	Hoeft K, Schaefer G J L, Kim H, et al. Platelet-instructed SPP1⁺ macrophages drive myofibroblast activation in fibrosis in a CXCL4-dependent manner[J]. Cell Rep, 2023, 42(2): 112131.
[29]	Luo Y, Zhang H K, Yu J, et al. Stem cell factor/mast cell/CCL2/monocyte/macrophage axis promotes Coxsackievirus B3 myocarditis and cardiac fibrosis by increasing Ly6C^high monocyte influx and fibrogenic mediators production[J]. Immunology, 2022, 167(4): 590-605.
[30]	Alshoubaki Y K, Nayer B, Lu Y Z, et al. Tregs delivered post-myocardial infarction adopt an injury-specific phenotype promoting cardiac repair via macrophages in mice[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 6480.
[31]	Hulsmans M, Sager H B, Roh J D, et al. Cardiac macrophages promote diastolic dysfunction[J]. J Exp Med, 2018, 215(2): 423-440.
[32]	Shirakawa K, Endo J, Kataoka M, et al. IL (interleukin)-10-STAT3-galectin-3 axis is essential for osteopontin-producing reparative macrophage polarization after myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 2018, 138(18): 2021-2035.
[33]	Divakaran V, Adrogue J, Ishiyama M, et al. Adaptive and maladptive effects of SMAD3 signaling in the adult heart after hemodynamic pressure overloading[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2009, 2(6): 633-642.
[34]	Sawaki D, Czibik G, Pini M, et al. Visceral adipose tissue drives cardiac aging through modulation of fibroblast senescence by osteopontin production[J]. Circulation, 2018, 138(8): 809-822.
[35]	Hulsmans M, Schloss M J, Lee I H, et al. Recruited macrophages elicit atrial fibrillation[J]. Science, 2023, 381(6654): 231-239.
[36]	Duan X Y, Zhang L, Liu K Y, et al. Macrophage-derived SPP1 exacerbate myocardial injury by interacting with fibroblasts in viral myocarditis[J]. Biol Direct, 2025, 20(1): 30.
[37]	Alexanian M, Przytycki P F, Micheletti R, et al. A transcriptional switch governs fibroblast activation in heart disease[J]. Nature, 2021, 595(7867): 438-443.
[38]	Wang B, Wang Z M, Ji J L, et al. Macrophage-derived exosomal mir-155 regulating cardiomyocyte pyroptosis and hypertrophy in uremic cardiomyopathy[J]. JACC Basic Transl Sci, 2020, 5(2): 148-166.
[39]	Bevan L, Lim Z W, Venkatesh B, et al. Specific macrophage populations promote both cardiac scar deposition and subsequent resolution in adult zebrafish[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2020, 116(7): 1357-1371.
[40]	Liu Y, Shao Y H, Zhang J M, et al. Macrophage CARD9 mediates cardiac injury following myocardial infarction through regulation of lipocalin 2 expression[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2023, 8(1): 394.
[41]	Lim H Y, Lim S Y, Tan C K, et al. Hyaluronan receptor LYVE-1-expressing macrophages maintain arterial tone through hyaluronan-mediated regulation of smooth muscle cell collagen[J]. Immunity, 2018, 49(2): 326-341.e7.
[42]	Constanty F, Wu B L, Wei K H, et al. Border-zone cardiomyocytes and macrophages regulate extracellular matrix remodeling to promote cardiomyocyte protrusion during cardiac regeneration[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1): 3823.
[43]	Morita Y, Araki H, Sugimoto T, et al. Legumain/asparaginyl endopeptidase controls extracellular matrix remodeling through the degradation of fibronectin in mouse renal proximal tubular cells[J]. FEBS Lett, 2007, 581(7): 1417-1424.
[44]	Pan L H, Bai P Y, Weng X Y, et al. Legumain is an endogenous modulator of integrin αvβ3 triggering vascular degeneration, dissection, and rupture[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(9): 659-674.
[45]	Jia D L, Chen S Q, Bai P Y, et al. Cardiac resident macrophage-derived legumain improves cardiac repair by promoting clearance and degradation of apoptotic cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 2022, 145(20): 1542-1556.
[46]	Abe H, Takeda N, Isagawa T, et al. Macrophage hypoxia signaling regulates cardiac fibrosis via Oncostatin M[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 2824.
[47]	Xu Y, Jiang K, Su F H, et al. A transient wave of Bhlhe41⁺ resident macrophages enables remodeling of the developing infarcted myocardium[J]. Cell Rep, 2023, 42(10): 113174.
[48]	Madsen D H, Leonard D, Masedunskas A, et al. M2-like macrophages are responsible for collagen degradation through a mannose receptor-mediated pathway[J]. J Cell Biol, 2013, 202(6): 951-966.
[49]	Haider N, Boscá L, Zandbergen H R, et al. Transition of macrophages to fibroblast-like cells in healing myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 74(25): 3124-3135.
[50]	Wang Y Y, Jiang H, Pan J, et al. Macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition contributes to interstitial fibrosis in chronic renal allograft injury[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 28(7): 2053-2067.
[51]	Little K, Llorián-Salvador M, Tang M, et al. Macrophage to myofibroblast transition contributes to subretinal fibrosis secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2020, 17(1): 355.
[52]	Zeng J, Du X L, Lu Q Q, et al. Inhibition of GDNF-driven macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition protects against colitis-associated intestinal fibrosis[J]. Inflammation, 2025, 48(4): 2069-2077.
[53]	Simões F C, Cahill T J, Kenyon A, et al. Macrophages directly contribute collagen to scar formation during zebrafish heart regeneration and mouse heart repair[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 600.
[54]	Aloysius A, DasGupta R, Dhawan J. The transcription factor Lef1 switches partners from β-catenin to Smad3 during muscle stem cell quiescence[J]. Sci Signal, 2018, 11(540): eaan3000.
[55]	Shen S C, Zhang M, Wang X H, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals S100a9^hi macrophages promote the transition from acute inflammation to fibrotic remodeling after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion[J]. Theranostics, 2024, 14(3): 1241-1259.
[56]	Cho H H, Rhee S, Cho D I, et al. IKKε-deficient macrophages impede cardiac repair after myocardial infarction by enhancing the macrophage-myofibroblast transition[J]. Exp Mol Med, 2024, 56(9): 2052-2064.
[57]	Zhuang T, Chen M H, Wu R X, et al. ALKBH5-mediated m6A modification of IL-11 drives macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition and pathological cardiac fibrosis in mice[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 1995.
[58]	Han Y T, Xian Y Q, Gao X M, et al. Eplerenone inhibits the macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition in rats with UUO-induced type 4 cardiorenal syndrome through the MR/CTGF pathway[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2022, 113: 109396.
[59]	Wang Q Y, Wang Y, Lin Y J, et al. Thymic Bmi-1 hampers γδT17 generation and its derived RORγt-IL-17A signaling to delay cardiac aging[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2025, 122(20): e2414717122.
[60]	Rurik J G, Aghajanian H, Epstein J A. Immune cells and immunotherapy for cardiac injury and repair[J]. Circ Res, 2021, 128(11): 1766-1779.
[61]	Nagareddy P R, Sreejit G, Abo-Aly M, et al. NETosis is required for S100A8/A9-induced granulopoiesis after myocardial infarction[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2020, 40(11): 2805-2807.
[62]	Wei X Q, Zou S, Xie Z H, et al. EDIL3 deficiency ameliorates adverse cardiac remodelling by neutrophil extracellular traps (NET)-mediated macrophage polarization[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2022, 118(9): 2179-2195.
[63]	Horckmans M, Ring L, Duchene J, et al. Neutrophils orchestrate post-myocardial infarction healing by polarizing macrophages towards a reparative phenotype[J]. Eur Heart J, 2017, 38(3): 187-197.
[64]	Wang Y J, Singh K, Lokman A B, et al. Regulatory T cells attenuate chronic inflammation and cardiac fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2025, 17(806): eadq3516.
[65]	Alshoubaki Y K, Nayer B, Lu Y Z, et al. Tregs delivered post-myocardial infarction adopt an injury-specific phenotype promoting cardiac repair via macrophages in mice[J]. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 6480.
[66]	Zhang L L, Wang S, Ding Y, et al. Macrophage-TREM2 promotes cardiac repair by restricting the infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells via CXCL16-CXCR6 axis after myocardial infarction[J]. Theranostics, 2025, 15(18): 9580-9600.
[67]	Wu Y R, Meng L, Zhan S Y, et al. ITIH5-mediated fibroblast/macrophage crosstalk exacerbates cardiac remodelling after myocardial infarction[J]. J Transl Med, 2025, 23(1): 224.
[68]	Jung M, Ma Y G, Iyer R P, et al. IL-10 improves cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction by stimulating M2 macrophage polarization and fibroblast activation[J]. Basic Res Cardiol, 2017, 112(3): 33.
[69]	Shiraishi M, Shintani Y, Shintani Y, et al. Alternatively activated macrophages determine repair of the infarcted adult murine heart[J]. J Clin Invest, 2016, 126(6): 2151-2166.
[70]	Mia M M, Cibi D M, Abdul Ghani S A B, et al. YAP/TAZ deficiency reprograms macrophage phenotype and improves infarct healing and cardiac function after myocardial infarction[J]. PLoS Biol, 2020, 18(12): e3000941.
[71]	Broch K, Anstensrud A K, Woxholt S, et al. Randomized trial of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 77(15): 1845-1855.
[72]	Chen S Q, Wang K, Fan Z F, et al. Modulation of anti-cardiac fibrosis immune responses by changing M2 macrophages into M1 macrophages[J]. Mol Med, 2024, 30(1): 88.
[73]	Wu Q Q, Yao Q, Hu T T, et al. Dapagliflozin protects against chronic heart failure in mice by inhibiting macrophage-mediated inflammation, independent of SGLT2[J]. Cell Rep Med, 2023, 4(12): 101334.
[74]	Lee T M, Chang N C, Lin S Z. Dapagliflozin, a selective SGLT2 Inhibitor, attenuated cardiac fibrosis by regulating the macrophage polarization via STAT3 signaling in infarcted rat hearts[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 2017, 104: 298-310.
[75]	Machtakova M, Thérien-Aubin H, Landfester K. Polymer nano-systems for the encapsulation and delivery of active biomacromolecular therapeutic agents[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2022, 51(1): 128-152.
[76]	Zhao L, Ren T H, Wang D D. Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development[J]. Acta Pharmacol Sin, 2012, 33(11): 1339-1347.
[77]	Pei W Y, Zhang Y Y, Zhu X L, et al. Multitargeted immunomodulatory therapy for viral myocarditis by engineered extracellular vesicles[J]. ACS Nano, 2024, 18(4): 2782-2799.
[78]	Sun B, Wu W X, Narasipura E A, et al. Engineering nanoparticle toolkits for mRNA delivery[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2023, 200: 115042.
[79]	Kim M, Jeong M, Hur S, et al. Engineered ionizable lipid nanoparticles for targeted delivery of RNA therapeutics into different types of cells in the liver[J]. Sci Adv, 2021, 7(9): eabf4398.
[80]	Tan H P, Song Y N, Chen J, et al. Platelet-like fusogenic liposome-mediated targeting delivery of miR-21 improves myocardial remodeling by reprogramming macrophages post myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2021, 8(15): e2100787.
[81]	Guo T T, Chen L H, Li F, et al. Biomimetic nanoparticles loaded lutein functionalized by macrophage membrane for targeted amelioration pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 167: 115579.
[82]	Wang L L, Janes M E, Kumbhojkar N, et al. Cell therapies in the clinic[J]. Bioeng Transl Med, 2021, 6(2): e10214.
[83]	Poltavets A S, Vishnyakova P A, Elchaninov A V, et al. Macrophage modification strategies for efficient cell therapy[J]. Cells, 2020, 9(6): 1535.
[84]	Gao Z B, Yan L, Meng J F, et al. Targeting cardiac fibrosis with chimeric antigen receptor macrophages[J]. Cell Discov, 2024, 10(1): 86.
[85]	Wang J W, Du H, Xie W R, et al. CAR-macrophage therapy alleviates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. Circ Res, 2024, 135(12): 1161-1174.
[86]	Tan H P, Li W Y, Pang Z Q, et al. Genetically engineered macrophages co-loaded with CD47 inhibitors synergistically reconstruct efferocytosis and improve cardiac remodeling post myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury[J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2024, 13(16): 2303267.
[87]	Sansonetti M, Al Soodi B, Thum T, et al. Macrophage-based therapeutic approaches for cardiovascular diseases[J]. Basic Res Cardiol, 2024, 119(1): 1-33.
[88]	Takata K, Kozaki T, Lee C Z W, et al. Induced-pluripotent-stem-cell-derived primitive macrophages provide a platform for modeling tissue-resident macrophage differentiation and function[J]. Immunity, 2017, 47(1): 183-198.e6.
[89]	Xiao Y, Zhang H, Liu X, et al. Medium from human iPSC-derived primitive macrophages promotes adult cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac regeneration[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1): 3012.
[90]	Liu Z J, Chen C, Zhang Y L, et al. Legumain in situ engineering promotes efferocytosis of CAR macrophage to treat cardiac fibrosis[J]. Adv Mater, 2025, 37(27): e2417831.
[91]	Du H, You X T, Zhang J H, et al. CAR macrophages engineered in vivo for attenuating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. Circ Res, 2025, 137(6): 846-859.

巨噬细胞介导心肌纤维化的分子机制及靶向干预研究进展

Research progress on the molecular mechanisms and targeted interventions of macrophage-mediated myocardial fibrosis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 91

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	何苏荟, 赵银龙, 张家毓. 端粒酶基因治疗对压力超负荷心力衰竭小鼠的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(8): 949-956.
[2]	姜芊羽, 姚程程, 季萍, 王颖. HAMA水凝胶促进皮肤创面愈合的组织局部微环境特征[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(8): 969-980.
[3]	王琳, 徐萍, 张乔婷, 田军, 娄晓丽, 王静. 胱天蛋白酶募集域蛋白9在重症急性胰腺炎巨噬细胞M1极化中的作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(8): 981-989.
[4]	韩龙传, 李悦, 邹智慧, 罗静, 李若伊, 张颖婷, 唐欣欣, 田丽红, 陆宇恒, 黄莺, 贺明, 付寅坤. 磷脂酰乙醇胺引起内质网应激促进巨噬细胞衰老及肝损伤[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(6): 693-704.
[5]	黄英荷, 招冠钰, 孙阳, 侯鉴基, 左勇. 2型糖尿病创面愈合中巨噬细胞代谢调控的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(6): 792-799.
[6]	汤开然, 冯成领, 韩邦旻. 基于单细胞测序与转录组测序构建M2巨噬细胞基因相关的前列腺癌预后模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(5): 549-561.
[7]	禹恺, 帅哲玮, 黄洪军, 罗艳. 小胶质细胞在中枢神经系统炎症性疾病中的作用和机制研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(5): 630-638.
[8]	倪书奕, 姜钊, 汪中涛, 何树梅. 红景天苷对卡介苗感染的巨噬细胞免疫功能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(4): 426-433.
[9]	马秀珍, 周妮, 郭思琪, 王源媛, 麦平. 大麻素受体1通过Gα_i/o/RhoA信号通路促进急性肺损伤小鼠巨噬细胞M1极化[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(2): 161-168.
[10]	罗文, 吕明君, 张珍, 张雪, 姚志荣. 自噬在皮肤黑色素瘤中的双重效应及耐药中的作用研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(2): 233-240.
[11]	唐珺倩, 李本尚. 儿童高危细胞遗传学B系急性淋巴细胞白血病治疗新进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 45(10): 1390-1399.
[12]	张烨晟, 杨易静, 黄依雯, 施珑玙, 王曼媛, 陈思思. 肿瘤微环境免疫细胞调节肿瘤细胞耐药性的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(7): 830-838.
[13]	张勇, 李伟宏, 程志鹏, 王斌, 王思珩, 王毓斌. 受体相互作用蛋白激酶1调节癌症进展和免疫反应的研究现状[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(6): 788-794.
[14]	牛媛媛, 汪龙德, 胥文娟, 李正菊, 张瑞婷, 吴毓谦. 巨噬细胞M1/M2型极化在不同肝病中的作用研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(4): 509-517.
[15]	徐文晖, 杨畅, 李瑞卿, 卞京, 李夏伊, 郑磊贞. 干扰素调节因子3促结直肠癌细胞增殖与侵袭相关探索[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 44(3): 301-311.