上海交通大学学报(医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 1201-1210.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2023.09.015
• 临床护理专题 • 上一篇
罗晨1,2(), 沈玲1(), 王传伟3, 顾佳妮4, 王瑾5, 赵黎1, 黄帅1
收稿日期:
2023-01-29
接受日期:
2023-05-23
出版日期:
2023-09-28
发布日期:
2023-09-28
通讯作者:
沈玲
E-mail:Luo.CH@sjtu.edu.cn;shenling@xinhuamed.com.cn
作者简介:
罗 晨(1997—),女,护士,硕士生;电子信箱:Luo.CH@sjtu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
LUO Chen1,2(), SHEN Ling1(), WANG Chuanwei3, GU Jiani4, WANG Jin5, ZHAO Li1, HUANG Shuai1
Received:
2023-01-29
Accepted:
2023-05-23
Online:
2023-09-28
Published:
2023-09-28
Contact:
SHEN Ling
E-mail:Luo.CH@sjtu.edu.cn;shenling@xinhuamed.com.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
目的·了解腹腔镜结直肠癌(colorectal cancer,CRC)根治术后患者早期下床活动现状及其影响因素。方法·采用方便抽样法,选取2022年1月—12月入住上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院肛肠外科和普外科的腹腔镜CRC根治术后患者作为研究对象,于术后24 h、48 h、72 h采用床旁询问患者和查看电子病历系统的方式收集患者的一般资料,疾病、手术、术后相关资料以及术后下床活动情况。采用单因素分析和二元Logistic回归进行影响因素分析。结果·共纳入277例患者,术后24 h内有47例患者下床活动,早期下床活动率仅为16.97%;这47例患者术后24 h内的步行距离为55.46(18.28,145.60)m,最小距离2.60 m,最大距离803.68 m。术后24 h内、>24~48 h、>48~72 h的Brown平均下床活动评分分别为2(0,4)分、8(0,10)分、8(8,10)分,分别属于低活动水平、中等活动水平、中等活动水平。早期下床组与未早期下床组患者的年龄、术前血红蛋白水平、麻醉时长、留置导管数目的差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。与未早期下床组相比,早期下床组患者首次排气时间、首次排便时间、术后住院时间均较短,差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。早期下床组术后未发生并发症,未早期下床组术后有11例患者发生并发症,并发症发生率为4.78%。二元Logistic回归分析显示,年龄≥70岁、术前血红蛋白水平低、麻醉时长长是患者术后早期下床活动的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。结论·腹腔镜CRC根治术后患者早期下床活动可显著加快术后康复,但患者早期下床活动现况有待改善。年龄、术前血红蛋白水平、麻醉时长是患者术后早期下床活动的影响因素。
中图分类号:
罗晨, 沈玲, 王传伟, 顾佳妮, 王瑾, 赵黎, 黄帅. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后患者早期下床活动现状及影响因素[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(9): 1201-1210.
LUO Chen, SHEN Ling, WANG Chuanwei, GU Jiani, WANG Jin, ZHAO Li, HUANG Shuai. Current status and influencing factors of early mobilization of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2023, 43(9): 1201-1210.
Item | Within 24 h after surgery | Within >24‒48 h after surgery | Within >48‒72 h after surgery |
---|---|---|---|
Mobility/n(%) | 47 (16.97) | 167 (60.29) | 216 (77.98) |
Walking distance/m | 55.46 (18.28, 145.60) | 138.48 (37.20, 307.88) | 169.62 (61.81, 395.57) |
Minimum walking distance/m | 2.60 | 2.24 | 1.12 |
Maximum walking distance/m | 803.68 | 2 040.92 | 5 302.80 |
Brown rating of mobility/point | 2 (0, 4) | 8 (0, 10) | 8 (8, 10) |
Brown level of mobility | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
表1 术后72 h内下床活动情况
Tab 1 Situation of mobilization within 72 h after surgery
Item | Within 24 h after surgery | Within >24‒48 h after surgery | Within >48‒72 h after surgery |
---|---|---|---|
Mobility/n(%) | 47 (16.97) | 167 (60.29) | 216 (77.98) |
Walking distance/m | 55.46 (18.28, 145.60) | 138.48 (37.20, 307.88) | 169.62 (61.81, 395.57) |
Minimum walking distance/m | 2.60 | 2.24 | 1.12 |
Maximum walking distance/m | 803.68 | 2 040.92 | 5 302.80 |
Brown rating of mobility/point | 2 (0, 4) | 8 (0, 10) | 8 (8, 10) |
Brown level of mobility | Low | Moderate | Moderate |
Item | Non-early mobilization group (n=230) | Early mobilization group (n=47) | χ2/t value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender/n(%) | 2.015 | 0.156 | ||
Male | 136 (59.13) | 33 (70.21) | ||
Female | 94 (40.87) | 14 (29.79) | ||
Age/n(%) | 6.000 | 0.049 | ||
<60 years old | 63 (27.39) | 21 (44.68) | ||
60‒69 years old | 96 (41.74) | 17 (36.17) | ||
≥70 years old | 71 (30.87) | 9 (19.15) | ||
Education level/n(%) | 0.778 | 0.378 | ||
Junior high school and below | 119 (51.74) | 21 (44.68) | ||
Senior high school and above | 111 (48.26) | 26 (55.32) | ||
Medical insurance payment method/n(%) | 1.595 | 0.451 | ||
Urban medical insurance | 185 (80.43) | 34 (72.34) | ||
Rural medical insurance | 37 (16.09) | 11 (23.40) | ||
Self-payment | 8 (3.48) | 2 (4.26) | ||
Marital status/n(%) | 2.120 | 0.548 | ||
Married | 220 (95.65) | 47 (100.00) | ||
Unmarried | 6 (2.61) | 0 (0) | ||
Divorced | 2 (0.87) | 0 (0) | ||
Widowed | 2 (0.87) | 0 (0) | ||
Place of abode/n(%) | 0.398 | 0.528 | ||
Town | 190 (82.61) | 37 (78.72) | ||
Village | 40 (17.39) | 10 (21.28) | ||
Underlying disease/n(%) | 0.049 | 0.825 | ||
No | 89 (38.70) | 19 (40.43) | ||
Yes | 141 (61.30) | 28 (59.57) | ||
Preoperative NRS 2002 score/n (%) | 0.662 | 0.416 | ||
<3 points | 209 (90.87) | 45 (95.74) | ||
≥3 points | 21 (9.13) | 2 (4.26) | ||
Preoperative BMI/n(%) | 0.602 | 0.740 | ||
<18.5 kg·m-2 | 17 (7.39) | 2 (4.26) | ||
18.5‒24.0 kg·m-2 | 132 (57.39) | 28 (59.57) | ||
>24.0 kg·m-2 | 81 (35.22) | 17 (36.17) | ||
Preoperative Hb level/n(%) | 4.594 | 0.032 | ||
Low | 81 (35.22) | 9 (19.15) | ||
Normal | 149 (64.78) | 38 (80.85) | ||
Preoperative albumin level/n(%) | 0.854 | 0.355 | ||
Low | 130 (56.52) | 30 (63.83) | ||
Normal | 100 (43.48) | 17 (36.17) | ||
Preoperative platelet level/(×109 L-1) | 217.61±76.89 | 215.47±60.11 | 0.180 | 0.857 |
Cardiac function/n(%) | 0.116 | 0.943 | ||
Ⅰ | 13 (5.65) | 3 (6.38) | ||
Ⅱ | 189 (82.17) | 39 (82.98) | ||
Ⅲ | 28 (12.17) | 5 (10.64) | ||
ASA/n(%) | 0.620 | 0.734 | ||
Ⅰ | 3 (1.30) | 0 (0) | ||
Ⅱ | 87 (37.83) | 18 (38.30) | ||
Ⅲ | 140 (60.87) | 29 (61.70) | ||
Anesthesia duration/h | 3.73±0.95 | 3.36±0.92 | 2.601 | 0.010 |
Number of indwelling catheters/n | 3.04±0.80 | 2.75±0.87 | 2.236 | 0.026 |
Stopping ECG monitor within 24 h after surgery/n(%) | 1.557 | 0.212 | ||
No | 20 (8.70) | 1 (2.13) | ||
Yes | 210 (91.30) | 46 (97.87) | ||
Stopping venous PCA within 24 h after surgery/n(%) | 2.404 | 0.121 | ||
No | 189 (82.17) | 34 (72.34) | ||
Yes | 41 (17.83) | 13 (27.66) | ||
Nausea and vomiting within 24 h after surgery/n(%) | 1.123 | 0.289 | ||
No | 169 (73.48) | 38 (80.85) | ||
Yes | 61 (26.52) | 9 (19.15) | ||
VAS within 24 h after surgery/point | 0.95±1.65 | 0.75±1.53 | 0.781 | 0.436 |
表2 未早期下床组与早期下床组相关资料比较
Tab 2 Comparison of relevant factors between the non-early mobilization group and the early mobilization group
Item | Non-early mobilization group (n=230) | Early mobilization group (n=47) | χ2/t value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender/n(%) | 2.015 | 0.156 | ||
Male | 136 (59.13) | 33 (70.21) | ||
Female | 94 (40.87) | 14 (29.79) | ||
Age/n(%) | 6.000 | 0.049 | ||
<60 years old | 63 (27.39) | 21 (44.68) | ||
60‒69 years old | 96 (41.74) | 17 (36.17) | ||
≥70 years old | 71 (30.87) | 9 (19.15) | ||
Education level/n(%) | 0.778 | 0.378 | ||
Junior high school and below | 119 (51.74) | 21 (44.68) | ||
Senior high school and above | 111 (48.26) | 26 (55.32) | ||
Medical insurance payment method/n(%) | 1.595 | 0.451 | ||
Urban medical insurance | 185 (80.43) | 34 (72.34) | ||
Rural medical insurance | 37 (16.09) | 11 (23.40) | ||
Self-payment | 8 (3.48) | 2 (4.26) | ||
Marital status/n(%) | 2.120 | 0.548 | ||
Married | 220 (95.65) | 47 (100.00) | ||
Unmarried | 6 (2.61) | 0 (0) | ||
Divorced | 2 (0.87) | 0 (0) | ||
Widowed | 2 (0.87) | 0 (0) | ||
Place of abode/n(%) | 0.398 | 0.528 | ||
Town | 190 (82.61) | 37 (78.72) | ||
Village | 40 (17.39) | 10 (21.28) | ||
Underlying disease/n(%) | 0.049 | 0.825 | ||
No | 89 (38.70) | 19 (40.43) | ||
Yes | 141 (61.30) | 28 (59.57) | ||
Preoperative NRS 2002 score/n (%) | 0.662 | 0.416 | ||
<3 points | 209 (90.87) | 45 (95.74) | ||
≥3 points | 21 (9.13) | 2 (4.26) | ||
Preoperative BMI/n(%) | 0.602 | 0.740 | ||
<18.5 kg·m-2 | 17 (7.39) | 2 (4.26) | ||
18.5‒24.0 kg·m-2 | 132 (57.39) | 28 (59.57) | ||
>24.0 kg·m-2 | 81 (35.22) | 17 (36.17) | ||
Preoperative Hb level/n(%) | 4.594 | 0.032 | ||
Low | 81 (35.22) | 9 (19.15) | ||
Normal | 149 (64.78) | 38 (80.85) | ||
Preoperative albumin level/n(%) | 0.854 | 0.355 | ||
Low | 130 (56.52) | 30 (63.83) | ||
Normal | 100 (43.48) | 17 (36.17) | ||
Preoperative platelet level/(×109 L-1) | 217.61±76.89 | 215.47±60.11 | 0.180 | 0.857 |
Cardiac function/n(%) | 0.116 | 0.943 | ||
Ⅰ | 13 (5.65) | 3 (6.38) | ||
Ⅱ | 189 (82.17) | 39 (82.98) | ||
Ⅲ | 28 (12.17) | 5 (10.64) | ||
ASA/n(%) | 0.620 | 0.734 | ||
Ⅰ | 3 (1.30) | 0 (0) | ||
Ⅱ | 87 (37.83) | 18 (38.30) | ||
Ⅲ | 140 (60.87) | 29 (61.70) | ||
Anesthesia duration/h | 3.73±0.95 | 3.36±0.92 | 2.601 | 0.010 |
Number of indwelling catheters/n | 3.04±0.80 | 2.75±0.87 | 2.236 | 0.026 |
Stopping ECG monitor within 24 h after surgery/n(%) | 1.557 | 0.212 | ||
No | 20 (8.70) | 1 (2.13) | ||
Yes | 210 (91.30) | 46 (97.87) | ||
Stopping venous PCA within 24 h after surgery/n(%) | 2.404 | 0.121 | ||
No | 189 (82.17) | 34 (72.34) | ||
Yes | 41 (17.83) | 13 (27.66) | ||
Nausea and vomiting within 24 h after surgery/n(%) | 1.123 | 0.289 | ||
No | 169 (73.48) | 38 (80.85) | ||
Yes | 61 (26.52) | 9 (19.15) | ||
VAS within 24 h after surgery/point | 0.95±1.65 | 0.75±1.53 | 0.781 | 0.436 |
Postoperative recovery indicator | Non-early mobilization group (n=230) | Early mobilization group (n=47) | χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial exhaust time/n(%) | 4.752 | 0.029 | ||
<24 h | 49 (21.30) | 17 (36.17) | ||
≥24 h | 181 (78.70) | 30 (63.83) | ||
Initial defecation time/n(%) | 3.809 | 0.049 | ||
<72 h | 106 (46.09) | 29 (61.70) | ||
≥72 h | 124 (53.91) | 18 (38.30) | ||
Postoperative length of stay/n(%) | 5.650 | 0.017 | ||
≤7 d | 15 (6.52) | 8 (17.02) | ||
>7 d | 215 (93.48) | 39 (82.98) |
表3 未早期下床组与早期下床组术后恢复指标比较
Tab 3 Comparison of postoperative recovery indicators between the non-early mobilization group and the early mobilization group
Postoperative recovery indicator | Non-early mobilization group (n=230) | Early mobilization group (n=47) | χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Initial exhaust time/n(%) | 4.752 | 0.029 | ||
<24 h | 49 (21.30) | 17 (36.17) | ||
≥24 h | 181 (78.70) | 30 (63.83) | ||
Initial defecation time/n(%) | 3.809 | 0.049 | ||
<72 h | 106 (46.09) | 29 (61.70) | ||
≥72 h | 124 (53.91) | 18 (38.30) | ||
Postoperative length of stay/n(%) | 5.650 | 0.017 | ||
≤7 d | 15 (6.52) | 8 (17.02) | ||
>7 d | 215 (93.48) | 39 (82.98) |
Variable | Assignment instruction |
---|---|
Anesthesia duration | Original value |
Number of indwelling catheters | Original value |
Age | <60 years old=0; 60‒69 years old=1; ≥70 years old=2 |
Preoperative Hb level | Low=0; Normal=1 |
表4 二元Logistic回归分析自变量赋值
Tab 4 Assignment of independent variables in binary Logistic regression analysis
Variable | Assignment instruction |
---|---|
Anesthesia duration | Original value |
Number of indwelling catheters | Original value |
Age | <60 years old=0; 60‒69 years old=1; ≥70 years old=2 |
Preoperative Hb level | Low=0; Normal=1 |
Item | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P value | OR | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (<60 years old) | - | - | 4.799 | 0.091 | - | - |
Age (60‒69 years old) | -0.620 | 0.377 | 2.707 | 0.100 | 0.538 | 0.257‒1.126 |
Age (≥70 years old) | -0.890 | 0.447 | 3.962 | 0.047 | 0.411 | 0.171‒0.986 |
Preoperative Hb level (normal) | 0.871 | 0.412 | 4.462 | 0.035 | 2.389 | 1.065‒5.362 |
Number of indwelling catheters | -0.371 | 0.216 | 2.960 | 0.085 | 0.690 | 0.452‒1.053 |
Anesthesia duration | -0.394 | 0.192 | 4.221 | 0.040 | 0.674 | 0.463‒0.982 |
Constant | 0.706 | 0.854 | 0.684 | 0.408 | 2.027 | - |
表5 术后早期下床活动影响因素的二元Logistic回归分析
Tab 5 Binary Logistic regression analysis of factors influencing getting out of bed within 24 h after surgery
Item | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P value | OR | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (<60 years old) | - | - | 4.799 | 0.091 | - | - |
Age (60‒69 years old) | -0.620 | 0.377 | 2.707 | 0.100 | 0.538 | 0.257‒1.126 |
Age (≥70 years old) | -0.890 | 0.447 | 3.962 | 0.047 | 0.411 | 0.171‒0.986 |
Preoperative Hb level (normal) | 0.871 | 0.412 | 4.462 | 0.035 | 2.389 | 1.065‒5.362 |
Number of indwelling catheters | -0.371 | 0.216 | 2.960 | 0.085 | 0.690 | 0.452‒1.053 |
Anesthesia duration | -0.394 | 0.192 | 4.221 | 0.040 | 0.674 | 0.463‒0.982 |
Constant | 0.706 | 0.854 | 0.684 | 0.408 | 2.027 | - |
1 | SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. |
2 | CAO W, CHEN H D, YU Y W, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(7): 783-791. |
3 | ROSOWICZ A, BRODY J S, LAZAR D J, et al. Early ambulation is associated with improved outcomes following colorectal surgery[J]. Am Surg, 2022: 31348221142590. |
4 | 中华医学会外科学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会. 中国加速康复外科临床实践指南(2021)(五)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2021, 12(5): 658-665. |
Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Society of Anesthesiology. Clinical practice guidelines for ERAS in China (2021)(Ⅴ)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(5): 658-665. | |
5 | VAN ZELM R, COECKELBERGHS E, SERMEUS W, et al. Variation in care for surgical patients with colorectal cancer: protocol adherence in 12 European hospitals[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017, 32(10): 1471-1478. |
6 | 倪平, 陈京立, 刘娜. 护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2010, 45(4): 378-380. |
NI P, CHEN J L, LIU N. Sample size estimation for quantitative research in nursing research[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2010, 45(4): 378-380. | |
7 | 梅阳阳. 加速康复外科理念下结直肠癌根治术后患者早期活动方案的构建与应用研究[D]. 新乡: 新乡医学院, 2021. |
MEI Y Y. Construction and application of early mobilization protocol for colorectal surgery in enhanced recovery after surgery[D]. Xinxiang: Xinxiang Medical University, 2021. | |
8 | KORANNE A, BYAKODI K G, TEGGIMANI V, et al. A comparative study between peptic ulcer perforation score, Mannheim peritonitis index, ASA score, and Jabalpur score in predicting the mortality in perforated peptic ulcers[J]. Surg J (N Y), 2022, 8(3): e162-e168. |
9 | CARABALLO C, DESAI N R, MULDER H, et al. Clinical implications of the New York Heart Association classification[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2019, 8(23): e014240. |
10 | KONDRUP J, ALLISON S P, ELIA M, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002[J]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(4): 415-421. |
11 | 万学红, 卢雪峰. 诊断学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 237, 352. |
WAN X H, LU X F. Diagnostics[M]. 9th ed. Beijing: People′s Medical Publishing House, 2018: 237, 352. | |
12 | KARCIOGLU O, TOPACOGLU H, DIKME O, et al. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use?[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2018, 36(4): 707-714. |
13 | BROWN C J, FRIEDKIN R J, INOUYE S K. Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2004, 52(8): 1263-1270. |
14 | 王明芽, 庄珊珊. 早期活动护理在腹腔镜下结直肠癌术后的应用[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2019, 10(23): 147-149. |
WANG M Y, ZHUANG S S. Application of early active nursing intervention in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery[J]. China Health Standard Management, 2019, 10(23): 147-149. | |
15 | 刘樱, 吴红学, 胡保红. 快速康复外科理念下的优质护理在结直肠癌手术患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(3): 332-336. |
LIU Y, WU H X, HU B H. Applied effects of fast track surgery-based high quality nursing during surgery of colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Disease (Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(3): 332-336. | |
16 | 朱世琴, 邓波, 宋美璇, 等. 结直肠癌患者术后早期活动方案的构建与应用研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2021, 21(7): 1025-1030. |
ZHU S Q, DENG B, SONG M X, et al. Construction and effects of early mobilization program for postoperative patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2021, 21(7): 1025-1030. | |
17 | LJUNGQVIST O, SCOTT M, FEARON K C. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(3): 292-298. |
18 | VAN ROOIJEN S, CARLI F, DALTON S, et al. Multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity and reduce postoperative complications: the first international randomized controlled trial for multimodal prehabilitation[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1): 98. |
19 | FICARI F, BORGHI F, CATARCI M, et al. Enhanced recovery pathways in colorectal surgery: a consensus paper by the Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI) and the PeriOperative Italian Society (POIS)[J]. G Chir, 2019, 40(4 Supp): 1-40. |
20 | CURTIS N J, NOBLE E, SALIB E, et al. Does hospital readmission following colorectal cancer resection and enhanced recovery after surgery affect long term survival?[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2017, 19(8): 723-730. |
21 | 陈静文, 徐林霞, 吴秀丽, 等. 基于Logistic回归与决策树模型的结直肠癌术后患者非计划性再入院影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(2): 1-6 |
CHEN J W, XU L X, WU X L, et al. Risk factors of unplanned readmission in postoperative patients with colorectal cancer: an analysis based on Logistic regression and decision tree[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(2): 1-6. | |
22 | LIU X Y, WANG Z J, YAO H, et al. Effects of acupuncture treatment on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in colorectal cancer: study protocol for randomized controlled trials[J]. Trials, 2022, 23(1): 100. |
23 | 吴茜, 汪夏云, 顾一帆, 等. 胃肠道肿瘤患者术后早期下床活动现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2021, 36(15): 27-29. |
WU Q, WANG X Y, GU Y F, et al. Status quo and influencing factors of early mobilization of patients after gastrointestinal tumors surgery[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2021, 36(15): 27-29. | |
24 | 李智, 龚姝. 加速康复外科理念下促进腹部手术患者术后早期下床活动的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2019, 19(1): 142-145. |
LI Z, GONG S. Research progress on strategies to promote early mobilization among patients after abdominal surgery based on the concept to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery[J]. Chinese Nursing Management, 2019, 19(1): 142-145. | |
25 | 熊方丽, 贺育华, 蒋晓莲. 加速康复外科模式下胃癌患者术后早期下床活动现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2022, 29(12): 1618-1622. |
XIONG F L, HE Y H, JIANG X L. Analyses of status and influencing factors of early ambulation in patients with gastric cancer under enhanced recovery surgery mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics in General Surgery, 2022, 29(12): 1618-1622. | |
26 | 张晓蕾, 王军. 神经外科手术患者术后早期下床活动的影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2021, 27(2): 227-231. |
ZHANG X L, WANG J. Influencing factors of early ambulation after surgery in neurosurgery patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing, 2021, 27(2): 227-231. | |
27 | GUSTAFSSON U O, SCOTT M J, HUBNER M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations: 2018[J]. World J Surg, 2019, 43(3): 659-695. |
28 | 郑立君, 胡臻, 常涛, 等. 腹腔镜下“无管化”结直肠手术的临床研究[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2018, 7(5): 447-452. |
ZHENG L J, HU Z, CHANG T, et al. Clinical study of laparoscopic “tube-free” colorectal surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Colorectal Disease (Electronic Edition), 2018, 7(5): 447-452. | |
29 | ZHAO S, ZHANG L Y, GAO F, et al. Transanal drainage tube use for preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2021, 156(12): 1151-1158. |
30 | SEGELMAN J, NYGREN J. Best practice in major elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)[J]. Updates Surg, 2017, 69(4): 435-439. |
31 | GRASS F, PACHE B, MARTIN D, et al. Feasibility of early postoperative mobilisation after colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 56: 161-166. |
32 | 沈波, 王建荣, 程艳爽. 上腹部术后患者早期活动现状及影响因素分析[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2021, 42(10): 1053-1057. |
SHEN B, WANG J R, CHENG Y S. Investigation on status and influencing factors of early mobilization in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery[J]. Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School, 2021, 42(10): 1053-1057. | |
33 | ZENG W G, LIU M J, ZHOU Z X, et al. Enhanced recovery programme following laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2018, 88(6): 582-586. |
34 | 汪夏云, 顾一帆, 陈红, 等. 术前三联预康复对老年结直肠肿瘤病人康复的影响[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(18): 3233-3238. |
WANG X Y, GU Y F, CHEN H, et al. Effect of preoperative trimodal prehabilitation on rehabilitation of elderly patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2022, 36(18): 3233-3238. | |
35 | GILLIS C, LI C, LEE L, et al. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014, 121(5): 937-947. |
36 | NGUYEN Q, MENG E, BERUBE J, et al. Preoperative anemia and transfusion in cardiac surgery: a single-centre retrospective study[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2021, 16(1): 109. |
37 | MUÑOZ M, GÓMEZ-RAMÍREZ S, MARTÍN-MONTAÑEZ E, et al. Perioperative anemia management in colorectal cancer patients: a pragmatic approach[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(8): 1972-1985. |
38 | 秦芳, 李秋萍, 陈曦, 等. 外科术后患者早期下床活动评估与应对的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(5): 101-105. |
QIN F, LI Q P, CHEN X, et al. Assessment and coping with early out-of-bed mobilization of patients after surgery: a review[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2020, 35(5): 101-105. | |
39 | American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management. Practice guidelines for perioperative blood management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 122(2): 241-275. |
40 | 中华医学会外科学分会, 中华医学会麻醉学分会. 中国加速康复外科临床实践指南(2021)(一)[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2021, 41(9): 1028-1034. |
Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Society of Anesthesiology. Clinical practice guidelines for ERAS in China(2021)(Ⅰ)[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology, 2021, 41(9): 1028-1034. | |
41 | XU C S, QU X D, QU Z J, et al. Effect of subarachnoid anesthesia combined with propofol target-controlled infusion on blood loss and transfusion for posterior total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2020(6): 650-656. |
[1] | 王晓玉, 彭银辉, 马文琳, 姚博爽, 李一凡, 赵莉, 杨春霞. 新冠疫情大流行期间儿童及青少年新发焦虑症状的纵向研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(8): 963-970. |
[2] | 彭恬, 徐雷鸣. 表观遗传修饰与环状RNA在结直肠癌中相互作用的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(2): 237-243. |
[3] | 涂娟娟, 金志明. 免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性结直肠癌的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2023, 43(2): 250-255. |
[4] | 孙惠华, 田秋菊, 吴蓓雯. 不同气腹模式下腹腔镜手术患者下肢深静脉血流速度的比较[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(9): 1329-1335. |
[5] | 胡慕妮, 季林华, 张昕雨, 沈超琴, 洪洁, 陈豪燕. 结直肠癌组织T细胞受体组库多样性与患者临床特征和具核梭形杆菌丰度的关联分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(8): 1045-1052. |
[6] | 邱佳辉, 蔡谦谦, 杨彦, 程非池, 裘正军, 黄陈. 神经脉管浸润联合肿瘤间质比对结直肠癌预后的预测价值[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(8): 1070-1080. |
[7] | 崔培荣, 倪雪萍, 宗明灿, 忻笑, 江雨露, 李贤华. 老年慢性病患者健康信息寻求行为现状及影响因素路径分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(6): 805-812. |
[8] | 许莉, 杨艳, 陈菡芬, 姜萌, 卜军. 急性心肌梗死患者于心脏康复中心就诊的影响因素及效果评价[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(5): 646-652. |
[9] | 赵敏, 褚以忞, 彭海霞. 结直肠癌和结直肠腺瘤筛查方式的研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(5): 673-679. |
[10] | 龚其雨, 陈磊. 多组学数据解析循环及浸润性B细胞在结直肠癌免疫微环境中的作用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(4): 472-481. |
[11] | 何烨, 方芳. 非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥患者术前糖化血红蛋白水平与术后谵妄的关系[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42(1): 21-27. |
[12] | 徐莹, 褚以忞, 杨大明, 李吉, 张海芹, 彭海霞. 基于差异表达基因组合构建高度微卫星不稳定结直肠癌转移预测模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(9): 1197-1206. |
[13] | 蔡羽莹, 刘焰. 生活质量评估量表及心理评估工具在干眼症人群中的应用[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(9): 1252-1255. |
[14] | 程盛, 赵益, 王永琛, 黄平. BRAF基因突变对肝切除后的结直肠癌肝转移患者预后影响的meta分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(6): 786-792. |
[15] | 包汝娟, 陈慧芳, 董宇, 叶幼琼, 苏冰. 基于转录组异常表达构建结直肠癌特征基因预后风险评分模型[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(3): 285-296. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||