上海交通大学学报（医学版）

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1448-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2015.10.004

• 论著（临床研究） • 上一篇    下一篇

应激感受量表中文版的信度与效度

王振，王渊，吴志国，陈丹丹，陈珏，肖泽萍   

  1. 上海交通大学 医学院附属精神卫生中心， 上海200030
  • 出版日期:2015-10-20 发布日期:2015-12-22
  • 通讯作者: 肖泽萍, 电子信箱: xiaozeping88@163.com
  • 作者简介:王振（1978—）， 男， 副主任医师， 博士; 电子信箱: wangzhen@smhc.org.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(81371486)；上海市科委医学引导类项目(124119a8601)；上海市 “青年科技启明星”计划（13QA1403200）；上海交通大学 “医工交叉研究基金” （YG2013MS65）

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale

WANG Zhen, WANG Yuan, WU Zhi-guo, CHEN Dan-dan, CHEN Jue, XIAO Ze-ping   

  1. Shanghai Mental Health Center， Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine， Shanghai200030， China
  • Online:2015-10-20 Published:2015-12-22
  • Supported by:

    National Natural Science Foundation of China， 81371486； Medicine Guidance Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, 124119a8601; Shanghai Rising-Star Program， 13QA1403200； Biomedical Engineering Cross Research Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University， YG2013MS65

PDF (PC)

3031

摘要：

目的评估应激感受量表(PSS-10) 中文版的信度和效度。方法方便选取抑郁症、强迫症及健康志愿者共272名进行PSS-10及贝克抑郁量表（BDI-Ⅱ）、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)的测试，随机抽取30 名患者2周后进行PSS-10的重测。结果PSS-10中文版的Cronbach α系数为0.91，重测相关系数为0.69(P<0.05)；探索性因子分析显示PSS-10可提取“负性感受”（6个条目）和“正性情感”（4个条目）共2个因子，验证性因子分析显示两因子模型拟合度良好（χ2=44.52，P<0.107）。PSS-10总分与BDI-Ⅱ、BAI评分呈显著正相关(P<0.01)，3组样本PSS-10评分存在显著差异（F=107.6，P<0.01）。结论应激感受量表中文版具有良好的信度与效度，能够作为自评工具用来评估个体的应激感受水平。

关键词: 应激感受, 信度, 效度, 心理测量学研究

Abstract:

ObjectiveTo assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10).MethodsA total of 272 participants, including patients with depression and obsession and healthy volunteers, were selected and tested by the Chinese version of PSS-10, Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Thirty patients were randomly selected and retested by PSS-10 after 2 weeks.ResultsThe overall Cronbachs alpha of the Chinese version of PSS-10 was 0.91 and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.69 (P<0.05). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) yielded two factors, i.e. the negative feelings (6 items) and positive feelings (4items). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the fitting of the two factor model was perfect (χ2=44.52，P<0.107). The total score of PSS-10 significantly and positively correlated with scores of both BDI-II and BAI (P<0.01). The differences of scores of PSS-10 of three groups were significant (F=107.6，P<0.01). ConclusionThe reliability and validity of the Chinese version of PSS-10 are good and can be used as a self rating tool to assess the level of perceived stress.

Key words: perceived stress, reliability, validity, psychometric studies