中文版挫败感量表在男男性行为人群中的信度和效度评估

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.06.015

上海交通大学学报(医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 793-798.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2021.06.015

中文版挫败感量表在男男性行为人群中的信度和效度评估

刘尚滨¹(), 杨皓¹, 徐晨¹, 董婧雯¹, 喻晓月¹, 蔡泳¹, 袁东²(), 王英¹()

^1.上海交通大学公共卫生学院，上海 200025
^2.上海市疾病预防控制中心，上海 200336

出版日期:2021-06-28 发布日期:2021-06-29
通讯作者: 袁东,王英 E-mail:liushangbin12139@163.com;yuandong@scdc.sh.cn;yingwangxun@163.com
作者简介:刘尚滨（1997—），男，硕士生；电子信箱：liushangbin12139@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71673187);上海市公共卫生学科带头人(GWV-10.2-XD13);第五轮上海市公共卫生三年行动计划重点学科建设(GWV-10.1-XK15);上海交通大学公共卫生学院卓越人才培养成果为导向本科生拔尖培育项目(17ZYGW23)

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Defeat Scale in men who have sex with men

Shang-bin LIU¹(), Hao YANG¹, Chen XU¹, Jing-wen DONG¹, Xiao-yue YU¹, Yong CAI¹, Dong YUAN²(), Ying WANG¹()

^1.Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Public Health, Shanghai 200025, China
^2.Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control, Shanghai 200336, China

Online:2021-06-28 Published:2021-06-29
Contact: Dong YUAN,Ying WANG E-mail:liushangbin12139@163.com;yuandong@scdc.sh.cn;yingwangxun@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(71673187);Leader of Public Health Discipline in Shanghai(GWV-10.2-XD13);Construction of Key Disciplines in the Fifth Round of Shanghai Public Health Three-year Action Plan(GWV-10.1-XK15);The Top Training Program for Undergraduates Guided by the Achievements in the Training of Outstanding Talents in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Public Health(17ZYGW23)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的·检验中文版挫败感量表（Defeat Scale，DS）在上海市和沈阳市男男性行为人群（men who have sex with men，MSM）中的信度、效度，探索其对该群体抑郁状态的判断价值。方法·使用DS和患者健康问卷抑郁量表（Patient Health Questionnaire-9，PHQ-9），在上海市和沈阳市选择年龄18周岁以上且在过去的6个月曾经发生过男男性行为的530名男性展开横断面调查。使用Excel 2010建立数据库，采用SPSS 23.0和AMOS 25.0软件对数据进行信度和效度分析。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验方法判断数据是否服从正态分布。采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析验证其结构效度。用Spearman相关系数评价DS的内容效度。采用Cronbach's α系数和Spearman-Brown系数评价其信度。采用二元Logistic回归判断挫败感是否能影响抑郁状态，在此结果基础上进一步使用受试者操作特征曲线（receiver operator characteristic curve，ROC curve）判断其诊断价值。结果·DS与PHQ-9数据均不服从正态分布。探索性因子分析共提取出2个公因子，分别为颓败感（13个条目）和低成就感（3个条目），累计方差贡献率为69.35%。验证性因子分析显示，修正后的两因子模型中的各个条目因子载荷均大于0.50，最小值为0.52。两因子模型拟合优良［卡方自由度比（χ²/df）=3.430，<5；近似误差均方根（root mean square error of approximation，RMSEA）=0.068，标准化均方根残差（standardized root mean square residual，SRMR）=0.043，均<0.080；标准适配指数（normed fit index，NFI）=0.944，增值适配指数（incremental fit index，IFI）=0.959，比较适配指数（comparative fit index，CFI）=0.959，拟合优度指数（goodness of fit index，GFI）=0.909，塔克·刘易斯指数（Tucker-Lewis Index，TLI）=0.958，均＞0.900］。16个条目的DS内部一致性Cronbach's α系数为0.934，2个维度即颓败感和低成就感的Cronbach's α分别为0.962和0.758。以抑郁状态作为因变量，DS得分为协变量，进行二元Logistic回归，结果显示：β值为0.178，P=0.000；比值比（odds ratio，OR）为1.195，95%置信区间（confidence interval，CI）为1.147~1.245。ROC曲线下面积（area under the curve，AUC）为0.891，P=0.000；最大约登指数值为0.667，其所对应的DS得分为21.5，其灵敏度和特异度分别为87.0%和80.7%。结论·中文版DS在MSM中有良好的信度和效度，并且对该人群的抑郁状态具有判断价值。

关键词: 挫败感量表, 男男性行为人群, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective·To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Defeat Scale (DS) in the men who have sex with men (MSM) in Shanghai and Shenyang, China, and explore its value in judging the depressive state of the population.

Methods·A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 530 men over the age of 18 who had made sex with men in the past 6 months in Shanghai and Shenyang. DS and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used. Excel 2010 was used to establish the database, and SPSS 23.0 and Amos 25.0 software were used to analyze the reliability and validity of the data. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether the data obeyed normal distribution. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to verify its structural validity of DS. Spearman correlation coefficient was conducted to evaluate the content validity. Cronbach's α coefficient and Spearman-Brown coefficient were used to evaluate the reliability of DS. Binary Logistic regression was used to determine whether defeat can affect depression, and then, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine its diagnostic value.

Results·The data of DS and PHQ-9 did not obey the normal distribution. The exploratory factor analysis showed that two factors including decadence (13 items) and low sense of achievement (3 items) could be extracted. Explained variance of the scale was 69.35%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that each item of the revised two-factor model was greater than 0.50, and the minimum value was 0.52. The model fitted well [ χ²/df =3.430<5; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)= 0.068, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.043, all<0.080; normed fit index (NFI)=0.944, incremental fit index (IFI)=0.959, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.959, goodness of fit index (GFI)=0.909, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)=0.958, all＞0.900]. The Cronbach's α coefficient of DS of the 16 items was 0.934, and the Cronbach's α of two dimensions, namely "decadence" and "low achievement" were 0.962 and 0.758, respectively. With depression as the dependent variable and DS score as the covariant, binary Logistic regression was carried out. The results showed that β value was 0.178, P=0.000. Odds ratio (OR) value was 1.195 and 95% confidence interval (CI) was 1.147－1.245. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.891, P=0.000. The maximum Youden index value was 0.667, its corresponding DS score was 21.5, and its sensitivity and specificity were 87.0% and 80.7%, respectively.

Conclusion·The Chinese version of DS has good reliability and validity in MSM, and also has the value in judging the state of depression in this population.

Key words: defeat scale (DS), men who have sex with men (MSM), reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R395.4

刘尚滨, 杨皓, 徐晨, 董婧雯, 喻晓月, 蔡泳, 袁东, 王英. 中文版挫败感量表在男男性行为人群中的信度和效度评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(6): 793-798.

Shang-bin LIU, Hao YANG, Chen XU, Jing-wen DONG, Xiao-yue YU, Yong CAI, Dong YUAN, Ying WANG. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Defeat Scale in men who have sex with men[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE), 2021, 41(6): 793-798.

图/表 4

参考文献 21

1	Taylor PJ, Gooding P, Wood AM, et al. The role of defeat and entrapment in depression, anxiety, and suicide[J]. Psychol Bull, 2011, 137(3): 391-420.
2	Akın A, Uysal R, Çitemel N, et al.The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the defeat scale[J]. IOJES, 2013, 5(3): 660-666.
3	Siddaway AP, Taylor PJ, Wood AM, et al. A meta-analysis of perceptions of defeat and entrapment in depression, anxiety problems, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicidality[J]. J Affect Disord, 2015, 184: 149-159.
4	Kerridge BT, Pickering RP, Saha TD, et al. Prevalence, sociodemographic correlates and DSM-5 substance use disorders and other psychiatric disorders among sexual minorities in the United States[J]. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2017, 170: 82-92.
5	Luo ZZ, Feng TJ, Fu HL, et al. Lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation among men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2017, 17(1): 406.
6	Sivasubramanian M, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH, et al. Suicidality, clinical depression, and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in men who have sex with men in Mumbai, India: findings from a community-recruited sample[J]. Psychol Health Med, 2011, 16(4): 450-462.
7	Tomori C, McFall AM, Srikrishnan AK, et al. Diverse rates of depression among men who have sex with men (MSM) across India: insights from a multi-site mixed method study[J]. AIDS Behav, 2016, 20(2): 304-316.
8	刘珺, 郜艳晖, 杨翌. 男男性行为者抑郁症状流行病学研究现状[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2012, 16(6): 527-530.
9	Wetherall K, Robb KA, O'Connor RC. Social rank theory of depression: a systematic review of self-perceptions of social rank and their relationship with depressive symptoms and suicide risk[J]. J Affect Disord, 2019, 246: 300-319.
10	Liu J, Yi Z, Zhao Y, et al. The psychological health and associated factors of men who have sex with men in China: a cross-sectional survey[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(5): e0197481.
11	Galynker I, Yaseen ZS, Cohen A, et al. Prediction of suicidal behavior in high risk psychiatric patients using an assessment of acute suicidal state: the suicide crisis inventory[J]. Depress Anxiety, 2017, 34(2): 147-158.
12	Forkmann T, Stenzel JS, Rath D, et al. "Defeated by life" - validation of a German version of the defeat scale (DS-d)[J]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol, 2018, 68(7): 300-308.
13	Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression[J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2015, 37(1): 67-75.
14	李振华, 肖亚洲, 谢知, 等. 病人健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)在农村社区老年人群中的应用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(2): 171-174.
15	杨海洪. 9条目病人健康问卷抑郁量表在卒中后抑郁筛查中的应用价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(8): 28-30.
16	周春兰, 刘颖, 罗祥蓉. 病人健康问卷抑郁自评量表在住院糖尿病足溃疡患者中应用的信效度研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2016, 19(28): 3461-3466.
17	方鸿志, 崔汶, 范会勇. 挫折事件、抗挫折能力与大学生抑郁的关系[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2017, 25(7): 1089-1092.
18	Bobov G, Capik C. The reliability and validity of the religious health fatalism scale in Turkish language[J]. J Relig Health, 2020, 59(2): 1080-1095.
19	Joo H, Kang HH, Moon HS, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2021, 36(1): 135-144.
20	唐华, 王甦平, 龚睿婕, 等. 挫败感量表对医学生焦虑抑郁态的信效度评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(1): 84-88.
21	李灿, 辛玲. 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2008, 25(5): 541-544.

Item	Factor load
Item	Decadence	Low sense of achievement
Item 1	0.770	?
Item 2	?	0.883
Item 3	0.832	?
Item 4	－	0.882
Item 5	0.791	?
Item 6	0.777	?
Item 7	0.848	?
Item 8	0.786	?
Item 9	?	0.695
Item 10	0.810	?
Item 11	0.855	?
Item 12	0.880	?
Item 13	0.858	?
Item 14	0.869	?
Item 15	0.864	?
Item 16	0.838	?

Item	Factor load
Item	Decadence	Low sense of achievement
Item 1	0.770	?
Item 2	?	0.883
Item 3	0.832	?
Item 4	－	0.882
Item 5	0.791	?
Item 6	0.777	?
Item 7	0.848	?
Item 8	0.786	?
Item 9	?	0.695
Item 10	0.810	?
Item 11	0.855	?
Item 12	0.880	?
Item 13	0.858	?
Item 14	0.869	?
Item 15	0.864	?
Item 16	0.838	?

Item	r (P) value
Item	Decadence	Low sense of achievement
Item 1	0.794 (0.000)	?
Item 2	?	0.844 (0.000)
Item 3	0.830 (0.000)	?
Item 4	?	0.847 (0.000)
Item 5	0.771 (0.000)	?
Item 6	0.779 (0.000)	?
Item 7	0.855 (0.000)	?
Item 8	0.804 (0.000)	?
Item 9	?	0.752 (0.000)
Item 10	0.805 (0.000)	?
Item 11	0.835 (0.000)	?
Item 12	0.881 (0.000)	?
Item 13	0.836 (0.000)	?
Item 14	0.867 (0.000)	?
Item 15	0.848 (0.000)	?
Item 16	0.836 (0.000)	?

Item	r (P) value
Item	Decadence	Low sense of achievement
Item 1	0.794 (0.000)	?
Item 2	?	0.844 (0.000)
Item 3	0.830 (0.000)	?
Item 4	?	0.847 (0.000)
Item 5	0.771 (0.000)	?
Item 6	0.779 (0.000)	?
Item 7	0.855 (0.000)	?
Item 8	0.804 (0.000)	?
Item 9	?	0.752 (0.000)
Item 10	0.805 (0.000)	?
Item 11	0.835 (0.000)	?
Item 12	0.881 (0.000)	?
Item 13	0.836 (0.000)	?
Item 14	0.867 (0.000)	?
Item 15	0.848 (0.000)	?
Item 16	0.836 (0.000)	?

[1]	黄泽慧, 胡春, 李璞, 张春丽, 方均燕, 宋阿会, 魏珊, 纪鸥洋, 佟琰, 邓海, 刘英莉. 居家腹膜透析患者自我管理量表的编制及信度、效度分析研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2021, 41(7): 942-948.
[2]	王甦平1, 2，王亦晨1, 3，龚睿婕1, 4#，葛赟5，蔡泳1#. 自杀能力评估量表在某医学院校学生中的信度和效度检验[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(12): 1646-1651.
[3]	冯永辉，李慧，谌梦桂，蔡幸华. 青少年戒烟动机量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(11): 1509-1514.
[4]	李皎宇，钱丽萍，吴金金，李挺，叶霜. 系统性红斑狼疮抑郁评估量表信度和效度比较及抑郁危险因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(3): 304-.
[5]	刁华，王宏，杨连建，李婷，金凤，蒲杨. 青春期儿童生活质量量表在留守儿童中的应用考评[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(10): 1188-.
[6]	唐华 1，王甦平 1, 2，龚睿婕 3，王泽洲 2，蔡泳 2. 挫败感量表对医学生焦虑抑郁态的信效度评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 39(1): 84-.
[7]	施悦 1，王泽洲 1，沈秋明 1，拉巴仓拉 1，万和平 2，杨颖华 3，沈恬 1，蔡泳 1. 社区医护人员骨质疏松症防控行为量表的效度和信度分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(4): 439-.
[8]	陈如梦，陈剑华，徐一峰. 中文版工作同盟量表简版修订版在住院精神分裂症患者中的信度和效度研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(12): 1494-.
[9]	杨芝祐，李毓，汪超，马骏，吴斌，王育. 子宫内膜异位症患者生存质量量表（EHP-5）中文版的信度及效度分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 38(11): 1360-.
[10]	陈琪,王泽洲,陈宇红,周莹霞,陆骆,陈旻洁,李钟仁,费健,蔡泳. 上海市三级医院门诊患者糖尿病管理自我效能量表的信度与效度评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(05): 724-.
[11]	肖清平，喻秀丽，童立纺，凡芸，蔡泽中，邓德金，曹苏娟，王月清，赵庆华，肖明朝. 中文版护理院患者安全文化测评量表的信度与效度分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2016, 36(04): 555-.
[12]	顾伟敏，蒋丽娟，高阳，等. 医护人员工作价值观量表的制定及其信效度测评[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(9): 1374-.
[13]	梁彤彤，张薇薇，岳玲，等. 德国护养院居住者主观生活质量量表中文译本的可行性、信度、效度评价[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(7): 1062-.
[14]	张芳，程文红，肖泽萍，等. 渥太华自我伤害调查表中文版信效度研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(3): 460-.
[15]	王振，王渊，吴志国，陈丹丹，陈珏，肖泽萍. 应激感受量表中文版的信度与效度[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 35(10): 1448-.

中文版挫败感量表在男男性行为人群中的信度和效度评估

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Defeat Scale in men who have sex with men

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics