上海交通大学学报（医学版）

上海交通大学学报（医学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 439-.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2018.04.016

• 论著·公共卫生 • 上一篇    下一篇

社区医护人员骨质疏松症防控行为量表的效度和信度分析

施悦 1，王泽洲 1，沈秋明 1，拉巴仓拉 1，万和平 2，杨颖华 3，沈恬 1，蔡泳 1   

  1. 1.上海交通大学公共卫生学院，上海 200025；2.上海市健康促进中心，上海 200040；3.上海市疾病预防控制中心，上海 200336
  • 出版日期:2018-04-28 发布日期:2018-05-03
  • 通讯作者: 沈恬，电子信箱：pedyshen@126.com。蔡泳，电子信箱：caiyong202028@hotmail.com。为共同通信作者。
  • 作者简介:施悦（1991—），女，硕士生；电子信箱：sy1206joy@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金 (71603167)

Validity and reliability of osteoporosis prevention and control behavior scale for health care workers in community

SHI Yue1, WANG Ze-zhou1, SHEN Qiu-ming1, Lhakpa Tsamlag1, WAN He-ping2, YANG Ying-hua3, SHEN Tian1, CAI Yong1   

  1. 1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Public Health, Shanghai 200025, China; 2. Shanghai Center for Health Promotion, Shanghai 200040, China; 3. Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China
  • Online:2018-04-28 Published:2018-05-03
  • Supported by:
    Young Scientists Project of National Natural Science Foundation, 71603167

PDF (PC)

1078

摘要： 目的·编制社区医护人员骨质疏松症防控行为量表，并对量表的效度和信度进行评价。方法·在上海20家骨质疏松症规范化诊疗试点社区卫生服务中心，采用方便抽样的方式抽取400名医护人员进行调查，并在初次调查后的2周再从中随机抽取20名医护人员进行量表测定。采用内容效度、结构效度检测量表的效度。采用内部一致性克隆巴赫系数（Cronbachs α）、重测信度及分半信度3个指标检测量表的信度。结果·通过项目分析筛选，保留19条条目。在删除1条内容效度指数（item-level content validityindex，I-CVI）低于0.78的条目后，量表的全体一致量表内容效度指数（scale-level CVI/universal agreement，S-CVI/UA）和平均量表内容效度指数（scale-level CVI/average，S-CVI/Ave）分别为0.944和0.992。经探索性因子分析法提取了4个公因子，累积方差贡献率为85.94%；验证性因子分析结果与原假设一致，χ2/df3.323，CFI＝0.971，GFI0.902，RMSEA0.076。该量表的总Cronbachs α系数为0.978，各维度的Cronbachs α系数也均大于0.9。各条目的重测信度大于0.7，总量表的重测信度为0.654；分半信度为0.932。结论·社区医护人员骨质疏松防控行为量表具有良好的信度和效度，可用于社区医护人员骨质疏松防控行为实施情况的测量。

关键词: 社区医护人员, 骨质疏松症, 防控, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective · To compile the osteoporosis prevention and control behavior scale for health care workers in community and evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods · In 20 standardized diagnosis and treatment pilot community health service centers for osteoporosis in Shanghai，400 healthcare workers were conveniently sampled to conduct the survey and 20 of them who were randomly sampled underwent retest 2 weeks later. The validity of the scale was evaluatedcontent validity and structural validity. The reliability of the scale was testedCronbachs α coefficient, retest reliability and split-half reliability. Results · A total of 19 items were retained after project analysis. Scale-level content validity index/universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) and scale-level CVI/average (S-CVI/Ave) were 0.944 and 0.992, respectively, after an entry with item-level CVI (I-CVI) less than 0.78 was deleted. Four common factors were extractedexploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 85.94%. Results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model was consistent with the theoretical assumption, and the fitness indexes χ2/df, CFI, GFI, and RMSEA were 3.323, 0.971,0.902, and 0.076, respectively. The overall Cronbachs α coefficient of this scale was 0.978 and the Cronbachs α coefficients of the four dimensions were all over 0.9. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of each item was greater than 0.7, and the ICC of the total scale was 0.654. The split-half reliability coefficient was 0.932. Conclusion · The osteoporosis prevention and control behavior scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate the implementation of osteoporosis prevention and control behavior of health care workers in community.

Key words: health care workers in community, osteoporosis, prevention and control, scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: