子宫内膜癌的免疫微环境及免疫治疗研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2026.05.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

子宫内膜癌（endometrial carcinoma，EC）是严重威胁女性健康的常见恶性肿瘤。随着人口老龄化加剧及代谢性疾病高发，EC的发病率呈持续上升趋势。针对晚期或复发性EC，传统治疗方案疗效有限且易产生耐药性，患者总体预后较差。为突破这一临床瓶颈，以靶向性强、疗效持久为特点的免疫治疗策略，为EC开辟了全新的临床治疗方向。该文系统梳理了EC免疫微环境的细胞组成及分子分型特征，详细阐述了免疫检查点抑制剂单药及联合治疗的研究进展，同时剖析了当前面临的疗效异质性及耐药等挑战，以期为EC精准免疫治疗的临床实践与理论研究提供参考。

关键词: 免疫微环境, 免疫检查点抑制剂, 子宫内膜癌, 免疫治疗

Abstract:

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is a common malignant tumor that poses a severe threat to women's health. Driven by an aging population and the high prevalence of metabolic diseases, the incidence of EC continues to rise. For advanced or recurrent EC, traditional therapeutic regimens exhibit limited efficacy and are prone to drug resistance, leading to a generally poor overall prognosis. To overcome this clinical bottleneck, immunotherapeutic strategies, characterized by high targeting specificity and durable efficacy, have opened up a novel direction for clinical treatment. This review systematically summarizes the cellular composition and molecular subtyping characteristics of the EC immune microenvironment, and elaborates on the research progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in monotherapy and combination regimens. Furthermore, it provides an in-depth analysis of current challenges, including efficacy heterogeneity and drug resistance, to provide a reference for the clinical practice and theoretical research of precision immunotherapy for EC.

Key words: immune microenvironment, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), endometrial carcinoma (EC), immunotherapy

中图分类号:

R737.33

陈毓涵, 艾志宏. 子宫内膜癌的免疫微环境及免疫治疗研究进展[J]. 上海交通大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 46(5): 656-664.

Chen Yuhan, Ai Zhihong. Research progress on immune microenvironment and immunotherapy of endometrial cancer[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Medical Science), 2026, 46(5): 656-664.

图/表 3

参考文献 62

[1]	Siegel R L, Giaquinto A N, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(1): 12-49.
[2]	Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3): 229-263.
[3]	Tan N, Wu Y, Li B, et al. Burden of female breast and five gynecological cancers in China and worldwide[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2024, 137(18): 2190-2201.
[4]	Farajimakin O. The role of immunotherapy in the treatment of gynecologic cancers: a systematic review[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(7): e65638.
[5]	查皓然, 朱波. 实体瘤免疫治疗现状与未来发展方向[J]. 中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志, 2024, 31(11): 1061-1072.
	Zha H R, Zhu B. Current status and future directions of immunotherapy for solid tumors[J]. Chinese Journal of Cancer Biotherapy, 2024, 31(11): 1061-1072.
[6]	Zhan L, Liu X J, Zhang J, et al. Immune disorder in endometrial cancer: immunosuppressive microenvironment, mechanisms of immune evasion and immunotherapy[J]. Oncol Lett, 2020, 20(3): 2075-2090.
[7]	Patel M V, Shen Z, Rodriguez-Garcia M, et al. Endometrial cancer suppresses CD8⁺ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in postmenopausal women[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 657326.
[8]	Palomero J, Panisello C, Lozano-Rabella M, et al. Biomarkers of tumor-reactive CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ TILs associate with improved prognosis in endometrial cancer[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2022, 10(12): e005443.
[9]	Zou X Y, Shen J L, Zhang H D, et al. Association between immune cells and endometrial cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study[J]. Medicine, 2024, 103(19): e38129.
[10]	Le Bras A. Tracking tumor-associated macrophages[J]. Lab Anim, 2025, 54(2): 38.
[11]	Dey D K, Krause D, Rai R, et al. The role and participation of immune cells in the endometrial tumor microenvironment[J]. Pharmacol Ther, 2023, 251: 108526.
[12]	Sun Y H, Jiang G Y, Wu Q H, et al. The role of tumor-associated macrophages in the progression, prognosis and treatment of endometrial cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1213347.
[13]	Versluis M A C, Marchal S, Plat A, et al. The prognostic benefit of tumour-infiltrating natural killer cells in endometrial cancer is dependent on concurrent overexpression of human leucocyte antigen-E in the tumour microenvironment[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2017, 86: 285-295.
[14]	闫巧辉, 邢国臣, 潘琼. 恶性肿瘤特异生长因子和肿瘤浸润性树突状细胞在子宫内膜癌患者中的表达及临床意义[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2019, 27(5): 845-848.
	Yan Q H, Xing G C, Pan Q. Expression and significance of tumor specific growth factor and tumor infiltrating dendritic cells in patients with endometrial carcinoma[J]. Journal of Modern Oncology, 2019, 27(5): 845-848.
[15]	Vanderstraeten A, Luyten C, Verbist G, et al. Mapping the immunosuppressive environment in uterine tumors: implications for immunotherapy[J]. Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2014, 63(6): 545-557.
[16]	Mabuchi S, Sasano T. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as therapeutic targets in uterine cervical and endometrial cancers[J]. Cells, 2021, 10(5): 1073.
[17]	Mamat Yusof M N, Chew K T, Kampan N C, et al. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in endometrial cancer: molecular and clinical significance[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(20): 15233.
[18]	Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Kandoth C, Schultz N, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Nature, 2013, 497(7447): 67-73.
[19]	Cree I A, White V A, Indave B I, et al. Revising the WHO classification: female genital tract tumours[J]. Histopathology, 2020, 76(1): 151-156.
[20]	谢玲玲, 林仲秋. 《2025 NCCN子宫肿瘤临床实践指南(第1版)》解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(1): 103-109.
	Xie L L, Lin Z Q. Interpretation of NCCN guidelines version 1. 2025 uterine neoplasms[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2025, 41(1): 103-109.
[21]	Di Tucci C, Capone C, Galati G, et al. Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: new scenarios on the horizon[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 30(3): e46.
[22]	Raffone A, Travaglino A, Mascolo M, et al. TCGA molecular groups of endometrial cancer: pooled data about prognosis[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 155(2): 374-383.
[23]	Momeni-Boroujeni A, Dahoud W, Vanderbilt C M, et al. Clinicopathologic and genomic analysis of TP53-mutated endometrial carcinomas[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2021, 27(9): 2613-2623.
[24]	Zhang B H, Zhang H Z, Qin Y R. A primer on the role of TP53 mutation and targeted therapy in endometrial cancer[J]. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed), 2025, 30(1): 25447.
[25]	Lin Q, Chen Z, Shi W, et al. JAK1 inactivation promotes proliferation and migration of endometrial cancer cells via upregulating the hypoxia-inducible factor signaling pathway[J]. Cell Commun Signal, 2022, 20(1): 177.
[26]	Yang Q L, Lv Z H, Wang M F, et al. LATS1/2 loss promote tumor immune evasion in endometrial cancer through downregulating MHC-Ⅰ expression[J]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2024, 43(1): 54.
[27]	Jiang X J, Wang J, Deng X Y, et al. Role of the tumor microenvironment in PD-L1/PD-1-mediated tumor immune escape[J]. Mol Cancer, 2019, 18(1): 10.
[28]	Yao H, Xu J. Regulation of cancer immune checkpoint: mono- and poly-ubiquitination: tags for fate[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2020, 1248: 295-324.
[29]	O'Malley D M, Bariani G M, Cassier P A, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability-high advanced endometrial cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-158 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(7): 752-761.
[30]	Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(10): 1353-1365.
[31]	Konstantinopoulos P A, Luo W X, Liu J F, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of avelumab in patients with mismatch repair deficient and mismatch repair proficient recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(30): 2786-2794.
[32]	Antill Y, Kok P S, Robledo K, et al. Clinical activity of durvalumab for patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient and repair-proficient endometrial cancer. A nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2021, 9(6): e002255.
[33]	André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2023, 6(11): e2341165.
[34]	Berton D, Pautier P, Lorusso D, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor retifanlimab in patients with recurrent microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair endometrial cancer: final safety and efficacy results from cohort H of the POD1UM-101 phase Ⅰ study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2024, 186: 191-198.
[35]	Ott P A, Bang Y J, Berton-Rigaud D, et al. Safety and antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in advanced programmed death ligand 1-positive endometrial cancer: results from the KEYNOTE-028 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(22): 2535-2541.
[36]	Chambers C A, Kuhns M S, Egen J G, et al. CTLA-4-mediated inhibition in regulation of T cell responses: mechanisms and manipulation in tumor immunotherapy[J]. Annu Rev Immunol, 2001, 19: 565-594.
[37]	Bruno V, Corrado G, Baci D, et al. Endometrial cancer immune escape mechanisms: let us learn from the fetal-maternal interface[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 156.
[38]	Khalifa R, Elsese N, El-Desouky K, et al. Immune checkpoint proteins (PD-L1 and CTLA-4) in endometrial carcinoma: prognostic role and correlation with CD4⁺/CD8⁺ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) ratio[J]. J Immunoassay Immunochem, 2022, 43(2): 192-212.
[39]	FDA. FDA grants accelerated approval to ipilimumab for MSI-H or dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer[EB/OL]. (2018-07-11) [2026-04-20]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-ipilimumab-msi-h-or-dmmr-metastatic-colorectal-cancer.
[40]	Hause R J, Pritchard C C, Shendure J, et al. Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types[J]. Nat Med, 2016, 22(11): 1342-1350.
[41]	Eskander R N, Sill M W, Beffa L, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(23): 2159-2170.
[42]	Van Gorp T, Cibula D, Lv W, et al. ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: a randomised, double-blind, phase Ⅲ study of pembrolizumab or placebo plus adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer[J]. Ann Oncol, 2024, 35(11): 968-980.
[43]	Mirza M R, Chase D M, Slomovitz B M, et al. Dostarlimab for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(23): 2145-2158.
[44]	Westin S N, Moore K, Chon H S, et al. Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for advanced endometrial cancer: the phase Ⅲ DUO-E trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2024, 42(3): 283-299.
[45]	Colombo N, Biagioli E, Harano K, et al. Atezolizumab and chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (AtTEnd): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2024, 25(9): 1135-1146.
[46]	Makker V, Aghajanian C, Cohn A L, et al. A phase Ⅰb /Ⅱ study of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in advanced endometrial carcinoma (study 111/KEYNOTE-146): long-term efficacy and safety update[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(5): 974-979.
[47]	Makker V, Rasco D, Vogelzang N J, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(5): 711-718.
[48]	Makker V, Taylor M H, Aghajanian C, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(26): 2981-2992.
[49]	Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herráez A, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(5): 437-448.
[50]	Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herráez A, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced endometrial cancer: updated efficacy and safety from the randomized phase Ⅲ study 309/KEYNOTE-775[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(16): 2904-2910.
[51]	Tian W J, Ren Y L, Lu J, et al. Camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer after failure of at least one prior systemic therapy (CAP 04): a single-arm phase Ⅱ trial[J]. BMC Med, 2024, 22(1): 344.
[52]	Galluzzi L, Buqué A, Kepp O, et al. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2017, 17(2): 97-111.
[53]	National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: uterine neoplasms (version 3.2025)[EB/OL]. (2025-11-19)[2026-04-20]. https://www.nccnchina.org.cn/guide/detail/997.
[54]	Zhang Y Q, Brekken R A. Direct and indirect regulation of the tumor immune microenvironment by VEGF[J]. J Leukoc Biol, 2022, 111(6): 1269-1286.
[55]	Fukumura D, Kloepper J, Amoozgar Z, et al. Enhancing cancer immunotherapy using antiangiogenics: opportunities and challenges[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2018, 15(5): 325-340.
[56]	Ott P A, Bang Y J, Piha-Paul S A, et al. T-cell-inflamed gene-expression profile, programmed death ligand 1 expression, and tumor mutational burden predict efficacy in patients treated with pembrolizumab across 20 cancers: keynote-028[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(4): 318-327.
[57]	Marabelle A, Le D T, Ascierto P A, et al. Efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with noncolorectal high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient cancer: results from the phase Ⅱ KEYNOTE-158 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(1): 1-10.
[58]	Nadelmann E R, Yeh J E, Chen S T. Management of cutaneous immune-related adverse events in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2022, 8(1): 130-138.
[59]	Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2017, 5(1): 95.
[60]	Pang K, Shi Z D, Wei L Y, et al. Research progress of therapeutic effects and drug resistance of immunotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade[J]. Drug Resist Updat, 2023, 66: 100907.
[61]	焦云姝, 李琛, 向阳. 靶向EZH2在妇科恶性肿瘤中的研究进展[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2025, 60(3): 236-240.
	Jiao Y S, Li C, Xiang Y. Advances of targeting EZH2 in gynecological malignancies[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025, 60(3): 236-240.
[62]	Keller P J, Adams E J, Wu R T, et al. Comprehensive target engagement by the EZH2 inhibitor tulmimetostat allows for targeting of ARID1A mutant cancers[J]. Cancer Res, 2024, 84(15): 2501-2517.

Drug	Study	Phase	Sample size/n	Biomarker	Primary endpoint	Secondary endpoint	ORR (95% CI)	mDOR(95% CI)	mPFS (95% CI)	mOS (95% CI)
Pembrolizumab	KEYNOTE-028^[35](NCT02054806)	Phase Ⅰb	75	PD-L1, MSI	ORR	Safety, DOR, PFS, OS	13.0 (2.8‒33.6)	NR	1.8 (1.6‒2.7)	NR
Pembrolizumab	KEYNOTE-158^[29-30](NCT02628067)	Phase Ⅱ	90 (Cohort D for EC: 11; Cohort K for non-colorectal MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors: 79)	MMR/MSI, PD-L1	ORR	DOR, PFS, OS, Safety	48 (37‒60)	NR	13.1 (4.3‒34.4)	NR
Avelumab	NCT02912572^[31]	Phase Ⅱ	33	MMR, POLE ultramutated, TMB	OR, PFS6	PFS, OS, Safety	dMMR: 26.7 (7.8‒55.1); pMMR/non-POLE: 6.25 (0.16‒30.2)	NA	dMMR: 4.4 (1.7‒NR); pMMR/non-POLE: 1.9 (1.6‒2.8)	dMMR: NR pMMR/non-POLE: 6.6 (2.0‒10.2)
Durvalumab	ANZGOG1601, ACTRN12617000106336^[32] (NCT03015129)	Phase Ⅱ	dMMR: 36; pMMR: 35	MMR	OTR	OTR, PFS, OS, AEs, HRQL, etc.	dMMR: 47 (32‒63); pMMR: 3 (1‒5)	NA	dMMR: 8.3 (2.4‒NR); pMMR: 1.8 (1.8‒2.0)	dMMR: NR pMMR: 12.1
Dostarlimab	GARNET^[33](NCT02715284)	Phase Ⅰ	327 (dMMR EC:141)	MMR/MSI, POLE ultramutated	ORR and DOR in patients with dMMR solid tumors	ORR and DOR in dMMR solid tumors in Cohorts A1 and F; individual PFS and OS for each cohort, etc.	45.5 (37.1‒54.0)	NR	6.0 (4.1‒18.0)	NR
Retifanlimab	POD1UM-101^[34](NCT03059823)	Phase Ⅰ	76	MMR/MSI, PD-L1	Safety, tolerability	ORR, DOR, PFS, OS	51.3 (39.6‒63.0)	NR	12.2 (6.0‒33.4)	30.2 (19.3‒NR)

Drug	Study	Phase	Sample size/n	Biomarker	Primary endpoint	Secondary endpoint	ORR (95% CI)	mDOR(95% CI)	mPFS (95% CI)	mOS (95% CI)
Pembrolizumab	KEYNOTE-028^[35](NCT02054806)	Phase Ⅰb	75	PD-L1, MSI	ORR	Safety, DOR, PFS, OS	13.0 (2.8‒33.6)	NR	1.8 (1.6‒2.7)	NR
Pembrolizumab	KEYNOTE-158^[29-30](NCT02628067)	Phase Ⅱ	90 (Cohort D for EC: 11; Cohort K for non-colorectal MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors: 79)	MMR/MSI, PD-L1	ORR	DOR, PFS, OS, Safety	48 (37‒60)	NR	13.1 (4.3‒34.4)	NR
Avelumab	NCT02912572^[31]	Phase Ⅱ	33	MMR, POLE ultramutated, TMB	OR, PFS6	PFS, OS, Safety	dMMR: 26.7 (7.8‒55.1); pMMR/non-POLE: 6.25 (0.16‒30.2)	NA	dMMR: 4.4 (1.7‒NR); pMMR/non-POLE: 1.9 (1.6‒2.8)	dMMR: NR pMMR/non-POLE: 6.6 (2.0‒10.2)
Durvalumab	ANZGOG1601, ACTRN12617000106336^[32] (NCT03015129)	Phase Ⅱ	dMMR: 36; pMMR: 35	MMR	OTR	OTR, PFS, OS, AEs, HRQL, etc.	dMMR: 47 (32‒63); pMMR: 3 (1‒5)	NA	dMMR: 8.3 (2.4‒NR); pMMR: 1.8 (1.8‒2.0)	dMMR: NR pMMR: 12.1
Dostarlimab	GARNET^[33](NCT02715284)	Phase Ⅰ	327 (dMMR EC:141)	MMR/MSI, POLE ultramutated	ORR and DOR in patients with dMMR solid tumors	ORR and DOR in dMMR solid tumors in Cohorts A1 and F; individual PFS and OS for each cohort, etc.	45.5 (37.1‒54.0)	NR	6.0 (4.1‒18.0)	NR
Retifanlimab	POD1UM-101^[34](NCT03059823)	Phase Ⅰ	76	MMR/MSI, PD-L1	Safety, tolerability	ORR, DOR, PFS, OS	51.3 (39.6‒63.0)	NR	12.2 (6.0‒33.4)	30.2 (19.3‒NR)

Study	Drug	Phase	Sample size/n	Biomarker	Primary endpoint	Secondary endpoint
NRG-GY018(KEYNOTE-868)^[41]	Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR: 225; pMMR: 591	MMR	PFS in patients with dMMR and pMMR	Safety, OS, and health-related quality of life
ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053(KEYNOTE-B21)^[42]	Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR: 281; pMMR: 814	MMR	DFS, OS	DFS, AEs, PROs
ENGOT-EN-6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY^[43]	Dostarlimab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR/MSI-H: 118; pMMR-MSS: 376	MSI/MMR	PFS in dMMR/MSI-H patients, overall PFS, and OS	PFS, ORR. DOR, etc.
DUO-E^[44]	Durvalumab/olaparib plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	718	MMR, PD-L1, HRRm	PFS	OS, safety, etc.
AtTEnd^[45]	Atezolizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel	Phase Ⅲ	551	MMR, PD-L1	PFS in dMMR patients and overall PFS and OS	ORR, DoR, PFS2, safety, etc.
KEYNOTE-146^[46-48]	Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib	Phase Ⅰb /Ⅱ	108	MMR/MSI	ORR	ORR, DOR, PFS, OS, safety, etc.
KEYNOTE-775^[49-50]	Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR: 130; pMMR: 697	MMR	PFS and OS in patients with dMMR/pMMR	ORR
CAP 04^[51]	Camrelizumab plus apatinib	Phase Ⅰ	36	MMR/MSI, PD-L1	ORR	DCR, TTR, DOR, TTF, PFS, OS, safety, etc.
Study	mPFS and HR		PFS and HR			mOS and HR
NRG-GY018(KEYNOTE-868)^[41]	dMMR: NR vs 7.6 (HR: 0.30); pMMR: 13.1 vs 8.7 (HR: 0.54)		(12 months) dMMR: 74 vs 38 (HR: 0.30); pMMR: 13.1 vs 8.7 (HR: 0.54)			NA
ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053(KEYNOTE-B21)^[42]	NA		NA			NA
ENGOT-EN-6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY^[43]	NA		(24 months) dMMR: 61.4 vs 15.7 (HR: 0.28); pMMR: 28.4 vs 18.8 (HR: 0.76); Overall: 36.1 vs 18.1 (HR: 0.64)			NA
DUO-E^[44]	CP+D+D, CP+D, and CP ITT: 15.1 vs 10.2 vs 9.6; dMMR: 31.8 vs NR vs 7.0; pMMR: 15.0 vs 9.9 vs 9.7		NA			CP+D+D, CP+D, and CP ITT: NR vs NR vs 25.9
AtTEnd^[45]	dMMR: NR vs 6.9 (HR: 0.36); Overall: 10.1 vs 8.9 (HR: 0.74)		NA			Overall: 38.7 vs 30.2 (HR: 0.82)
KEYNOTE-146^[46-48]	dMMR: 26.4; pMMR: 7.4; Overall: 7.4		NA			dMMR: NR; pMMR: 17.2; Overall: 17.7
KEYNOTE-775^[49-50]	pMMR: 6.6 vs 3.8 (HR: 0.60); Overall: 7.2 vs 3.8 (HR: 0.56)		NA			pMMR: 17.4 vs 12.0 (HR: 0.68);Overall: 18.3 vs 11.4 (HR: 0.62)
CAP 04^[51]	pMMR-MSS: 8.1; Overall: 6.2		NA			Overall: 21.0

Study	Drug	Phase	Sample size/n	Biomarker	Primary endpoint	Secondary endpoint
NRG-GY018(KEYNOTE-868)^[41]	Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR: 225; pMMR: 591	MMR	PFS in patients with dMMR and pMMR	Safety, OS, and health-related quality of life
ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053(KEYNOTE-B21)^[42]	Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR: 281; pMMR: 814	MMR	DFS, OS	DFS, AEs, PROs
ENGOT-EN-6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY^[43]	Dostarlimab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR/MSI-H: 118; pMMR-MSS: 376	MSI/MMR	PFS in dMMR/MSI-H patients, overall PFS, and OS	PFS, ORR. DOR, etc.
DUO-E^[44]	Durvalumab/olaparib plus paclitaxel/carboplatin	Phase Ⅲ	718	MMR, PD-L1, HRRm	PFS	OS, safety, etc.
AtTEnd^[45]	Atezolizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel	Phase Ⅲ	551	MMR, PD-L1	PFS in dMMR patients and overall PFS and OS	ORR, DoR, PFS2, safety, etc.
KEYNOTE-146^[46-48]	Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib	Phase Ⅰb /Ⅱ	108	MMR/MSI	ORR	ORR, DOR, PFS, OS, safety, etc.
KEYNOTE-775^[49-50]	Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib	Phase Ⅲ	dMMR: 130; pMMR: 697	MMR	PFS and OS in patients with dMMR/pMMR	ORR
CAP 04^[51]	Camrelizumab plus apatinib	Phase Ⅰ	36	MMR/MSI, PD-L1	ORR	DCR, TTR, DOR, TTF, PFS, OS, safety, etc.
Study	mPFS and HR		PFS and HR			mOS and HR
NRG-GY018(KEYNOTE-868)^[41]	dMMR: NR vs 7.6 (HR: 0.30); pMMR: 13.1 vs 8.7 (HR: 0.54)		(12 months) dMMR: 74 vs 38 (HR: 0.30); pMMR: 13.1 vs 8.7 (HR: 0.54)			NA
ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053(KEYNOTE-B21)^[42]	NA		NA			NA
ENGOT-EN-6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY^[43]	NA		(24 months) dMMR: 61.4 vs 15.7 (HR: 0.28); pMMR: 28.4 vs 18.8 (HR: 0.76); Overall: 36.1 vs 18.1 (HR: 0.64)			NA
DUO-E^[44]	CP+D+D, CP+D, and CP ITT: 15.1 vs 10.2 vs 9.6; dMMR: 31.8 vs NR vs 7.0; pMMR: 15.0 vs 9.9 vs 9.7		NA			CP+D+D, CP+D, and CP ITT: NR vs NR vs 25.9
AtTEnd^[45]	dMMR: NR vs 6.9 (HR: 0.36); Overall: 10.1 vs 8.9 (HR: 0.74)		NA			Overall: 38.7 vs 30.2 (HR: 0.82)
KEYNOTE-146^[46-48]	dMMR: 26.4; pMMR: 7.4; Overall: 7.4		NA			dMMR: NR; pMMR: 17.2; Overall: 17.7
KEYNOTE-775^[49-50]	pMMR: 6.6 vs 3.8 (HR: 0.60); Overall: 7.2 vs 3.8 (HR: 0.56)		NA			pMMR: 17.4 vs 12.0 (HR: 0.68);Overall: 18.3 vs 11.4 (HR: 0.62)
CAP 04^[51]	pMMR-MSS: 8.1; Overall: 6.2		NA			Overall: 21.0